Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Is Entanglement Monogamous?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv quant-ph/0307120 v1 pith:ZEUCG5HT submitted 2003-07-17 quant-ph

Is Entanglement Monogamous?

Barbara M. Terhal This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords entanglementmonogamousquantumanswersarticlebennettcharliediscuss
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this article I discuss Charlie's Bennett's influence in quantum information theory and our answers to the question whether quantum entanglement is `monogamous'.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dynamical Casimir Effect and Vacuum Friction in the Near-Horizon Geometry of a Black Hole

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A quantum Maxwell demon near a black hole horizon loses some work extraction ability for external observers due to information inaccessibility but obeys local thermodynamics and preserves the equivalence principle for...

  2. Dynamical Casimir Effect and Vacuum Friction in the Near-Horizon Geometry of a Black Hole

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In the near-horizon geometry of a black hole, the dynamical Casimir effect is suppressed by a conformal geometric factor and vanishing effective Mach number, causing the transition probability to vanish at the event horizon.