Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Value Based Argumentation Frameworks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv cs/0207059 v1 pith:EZOZNVET submitted 2002-07-15 cs.AI

Value Based Argumentation Frameworks

classification cs.AI
keywords argumentationframeworksableacceptanceargumentscasesdecisionderive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper introduces the notion of value-based argumentation frameworks, an extension of the standard argumentation frameworks proposed by Dung, which are able toshow how rational decision is possible in cases where arguments derive their force from the social values their acceptance would promote.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. What if Pinocchio Were a Reinforcement Learning Agent: A Normative End-to-End Pipeline

    cs.AI 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The thesis presents Pino, an end-to-end pipeline that supervises reinforcement learning agents with argumentation-based normative advisors, introduces an algorithm for automatic argument extraction, and defines a miti...