REVIEW 4 cited by
Breaking the logarithmic barrier in Roth's theorem on arithmetic progressions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Breaking the logarithmic barrier in Roth's theorem on arithmetic progressions
read the original abstract
We show that if $A\subset \{1,\ldots,N\}$ contains no non-trivial three-term arithmetic progressions then $\lvert A\rvert \ll N/(\log N)^{1+c}$ for some absolute constant $c>0$. In particular, this proves the first non-trivial case of a conjecture of Erd\H{o}s on arithmetic progressions.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Beating Product Constructions for Linear Equations Over Finite Fields
Any set avoiding a genus-one translation-invariant linear equation over finite fields can be improved upon by a higher-dimensional avoiding set with strictly higher normalized size.
-
A strengthening of Chang's lemma
A refinement of Chang's lemma that adds cosetwise l1 control on correlations outside the large spectrum subspace, producing a localized counting lemma for subsets of finite abelian groups.
-
On the Furstenberg-Katznelson constant for the IP Szemeredi theorem over finite fields
The paper establishes the existence of positive constants c and c_IP for the IP Szemeredi theorem over finite fields and gives strong quantitative bounds in the special cases of Roth and IP-Roth theorems.
-
Witness-split + window-cardinality refinement for $r_3(N)$: Architecture, empirical results, and a structural hard pocket
A witness-split and window-pruning SAT framework finds no 44-element 3-AP-free subset of [1,212] but leaves two resistant instances unsolved.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.