Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Experience Report: Deep Learning-based System Log Analysis for Anomaly Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.05908 v2 pith:VDEPWCCQ submitted 2021-07-13 cs.SE cs.LG

Experience Report: Deep Learning-based System Log Analysis for Anomaly Detection

classification cs.SE cs.LG
keywords anomalymethodslearning-basedsystemsdeepdetectiondetectorslog-based
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Logs have been an imperative resource to ensure the reliability and continuity of many software systems, especially large-scale distributed systems. They faithfully record runtime information to facilitate system troubleshooting and behavior understanding. Due to the large scale and complexity of modern software systems, the volume of logs has reached an unprecedented level. Consequently, for log-based anomaly detection, conventional manual inspection methods or even traditional machine learning-based methods become impractical, which serve as a catalyst for the rapid development of deep learning-based solutions. However, there is currently a lack of rigorous comparison among the representative log-based anomaly detectors that resort to neural networks. Moreover, the re-implementation process demands non-trivial efforts, and bias can be easily introduced. To better understand the characteristics of different anomaly detectors, in this paper, we provide a comprehensive review and evaluation of five popular neural networks used by six state-of-the-art methods. Particularly, four of the selected methods are unsupervised, and the remaining two are supervised. These methods are evaluated with two publicly available log datasets, which contain nearly 16 million log messages and 0.4 million anomaly instances in total. We believe our work can serve as a basis in this field and contribute to future academic research and industrial applications.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CelerLog: Fast Log Parsing via Dynamic Routing

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CelerLog dynamically routes logs to statistical or LLM processors based on pattern density, delivering leading accuracy on 14 datasets while being 7.9-18.6x faster than pure LLM parsers and cutting token use by 80-94%.

  2. AnomalyGen: Enhancing Log-Based Anomaly Detection with Code-Guided Data Augmentation

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AnomalyGen synthesizes realistic labeled log sequences from source code via Log-Oriented Control Flow Graphs and LLM CoT verification to boost F1 scores of 12 anomaly detection models on HDFS and Zookeeper.