Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

MOTChallenge 2015: Towards a Benchmark for Multi-Target Tracking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1504.01942 v1 pith:T464DNEG submitted 2015-04-08 cs.CV

MOTChallenge 2015: Towards a Benchmark for Multi-Target Tracking

classification cs.CV
keywords trackingevaluationbenchmarksbenchmarkcreatingdatadespitedifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the recent past, the computer vision community has developed centralized benchmarks for the performance evaluation of a variety of tasks, including generic object and pedestrian detection, 3D reconstruction, optical flow, single-object short-term tracking, and stereo estimation. Despite potential pitfalls of such benchmarks, they have proved to be extremely helpful to advance the state of the art in the respective area. Interestingly, there has been rather limited work on the standardization of quantitative benchmarks for multiple target tracking. One of the few exceptions is the well-known PETS dataset, targeted primarily at surveillance applications. Despite being widely used, it is often applied inconsistently, for example involving using different subsets of the available data, different ways of training the models, or differing evaluation scripts. This paper describes our work toward a novel multiple object tracking benchmark aimed to address such issues. We discuss the challenges of creating such a framework, collecting existing and new data, gathering state-of-the-art methods to be tested on the datasets, and finally creating a unified evaluation system. With MOTChallenge we aim to pave the way toward a unified evaluation framework for a more meaningful quantification of multi-target tracking.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. STORM: End-to-End Referring Multi-Object Tracking in Videos

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    STORM is an end-to-end MLLM for referring multi-object tracking that uses task-composition learning to leverage sub-task data and introduces the STORM-Bench dataset, achieving SOTA results.

  2. Graph Neural Based End-to-end Data Association Framework for Online Multiple-Object Tracking

    cs.CV 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A graph neural network framework learns affinities from appearance and motion then solves bipartite matching for online multiple-object tracking.