pith. sign in

arxiv: 1012.3381 · v2 · pith:OEW6DSRMnew · submitted 2010-12-15 · ⚛️ nucl-th

Improved nuclear matter calculations from chiral low-momentum interactions

classification ⚛️ nucl-th
keywords calculationsmatternuclearchiralimprovedinteractionslow-momentumprevious
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We present new nuclear matter calculations based on low-momentum interactions derived from chiral effective field theory potentials. The current calculations use an improved treatment of the three-nucleon force contribution that includes a corrected combinatorial factor beyond Hartree-Fock that was omitted in previous nuclear matter calculations. We find realistic saturation properties using parameters fit only to few-body data, but with larger uncertainty estimates from cutoff dependence and the 3NF parametrization than in previous calculations.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Ab initio calculations of parity-violating electron scattering off $^{48}$Ca and $^{208}$Pb

    nucl-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Ab initio chiral EFT calculations of parity-violating asymmetries for 48Ca and 208Pb show mild tension with data and infer a neutron skin of 0.187(25)(18) fm for 208Pb.

  2. From binding and saturation to criticality in nuclear matter with lattice effective field theory

    nucl-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Improved leading-order lattice Hamiltonians lower the liquid-gas critical temperature of symmetric nuclear matter to 13.50(17)-13.71(19) MeV while improving zero-temperature binding energies and saturation point.

  3. $l$-forbidden $\mathbf{M1}$ strengths near $^{100}$Sn from knockout reactions in Cd and Sn

    nucl-ex 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    New B(M1) measurements for l-forbidden transitions near 100Sn reveal that VS-IMSRG calculations systematically underpredict the strengths, consistent with discrepancies near 40Ca and 208Pb.