Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Evidence for Two Hot Jupiter Formation Paths

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1703.09711 v1 pith:M6AGE6LN submitted 2017-03-28 astro-ph.EP

Evidence for Two Hot Jupiter Formation Paths

classification astro-ph.EP
keywords formationgammamigrationrochefindjupiterjupitersmixture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Disk migration and high-eccentricity migration are two well-studied theories to explain the formation of hot Jupiters. The former predicts that these planets can migrate up until the planet-star Roche separation ($a_{Roche}$) and the latter predicts they will tidally circularize at a minimum distance of 2$a_{Roche}$. Considering long-running radial velocity and transit surveys have identified a couple hundred hot Jupiters to date, we can revisit the classic question of hot Jupiter formation in a data-driven manner. We approach this problem using data from several exoplanet surveys (radial velocity, Kepler, HAT, and WASP) allowing for either a single population or a mixture of populations associated with these formation channels, and applying a hierarchical Bayesian mixture model of truncated power laws of the form $x^{\gamma-1}$ to constrain the population-level parameters of interest (e.g., location of inner edges, $\gamma$, mixture fractions). Within the limitations of our chosen models, we find the current radial velocity and Kepler sample of hot Jupiters can be well explained with a single truncated power law distribution with a lower cutoff near 2$a_{Roche}$, a result that still holds after a decade, and $\gamma=-0.51\pm^{0.19}_{0.20}$. However, the HAT and WASP data show evidence for multiple populations (Bayes factor $\approx 10^{21}$). We find that $15\pm^{9}_{6}\%$ reside in a component consistent with disk migration ($\gamma=-0.04\pm^{0.53}_{1.27}$) and $85\pm^{6}_{9}\%$ in one consistent with high-eccentricity migration ($\gamma=-1.38\pm^{0.32}_{0.47}$). We find no immediately strong connections with some observed host star properties and speculate on how future exoplanet surveys could improve upon hot Jupiter population inference.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.