Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Systematic analysis of the peripherality of the ¹⁰Be(d,p)¹¹Be transfer reaction and extraction of the asymptotic normalization coefficient of ¹¹Be bound states

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.12074 v2 pith:JVGSNW6A submitted 2018-05-30 nucl-th

Systematic analysis of the peripherality of the ¹⁰Be(d,p)¹¹Be transfer reaction and extraction of the asymptotic normalization coefficient of ¹¹Be bound states

classification nucl-th
keywords textitreactioncalculationsinitioasymptoticboundcoefficientdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We reanalyze the experiment of Schmitt $\textit{et al.}$ on the $^{10}$Be$(d,p)^{11}$Be transfer reaction [Phys. Rev. Lett. $\textbf{108}$, 192701 (2012)] by exploring the beam-energy and angular ranges at which the reaction is strictly peripheral. We consider the adiabatic distorted wave approximation (ADWA) to model the reaction and use a Halo-EFT description of $^{11}$Be to systematically explore the sensitivity of our calculations to the short-range physics of the $^{10}$Be-$n$ wave function. We find that by selecting the data at low beam energy and forward scattering angle the calculated cross sections scale nearly perfectly with the asymptotic normalization coefficient (ANC) of the $^{11}$Be bound states. Following these results, a comparison of our calculations with the experimental data gives a value of $C_{1s1/2}=0.785\pm0.03$ fm$^{-1/2}$ for the $\frac{1}{2}^+$ ground-state ANC and $C_{0p1/2}=0.135\pm0.005$ fm$^{-1/2}$ for the $\frac{1}{2}^-$ excited-state, which are in perfect agreement with the $\textit{ab initio}$ calculations of Calci $\textit{et al.}$, who obtain $C^{\textit{ab initio}}_{1/2^+}=0.786$ fm$^{-1/2}$ and $C^{\textit{ab initio}}_{1/2^-}=0.129$ fm$^{-1/2}$ [Phys. Rev. Lett. $\textbf{117}$, 242501 (2016)].

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.