GWTC-5.0: Observations from the Second Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run and Updates to the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog
Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 15:44 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
The LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA network reports 161 new gravitational-wave candidates, all consistent with binary black hole mergers.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We find 161 compact binary coalescence candidates that are identified by at least one of our search algorithms with a probability of astrophysical origin p_astro >= 0.5 and that are not vetoed during event validation. Based on the inferred component masses, all these candidates are consistent with signals from binary black holes. We also provide detailed source property measurements for 104 candidates that have a false-alarm rate < 1yr^{-1}. This brings the total number of transients in the cumulative GWTC having p_astro >= 0.5 to 390.
What carries the argument
The p_astro threshold of at least 0.5 applied to outputs from multiple search algorithms, followed by vetoes and false-alarm rate cuts for source property inference.
If this is right
- All 161 new candidates match binary black hole signals with median component masses between 5.14 and 70 solar masses.
- Five signals exceed network signal-to-noise ratio of 30, reaching a maximum of 76.9, which supports more precise source studies.
- The expanded catalog of 390 events enables updated statistical analyses of compact binary populations.
- Louder signals allow tighter tests of general relativity on individual events.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Continued sensitivity gains in future runs are likely to increase the fraction of high-SNR events available for detailed follow-up.
- The current sample size may permit tighter population-level constraints on black hole spin and mass distributions once combined with earlier catalogs.
- Events near the lower mass edge could be checked for consistency with the expected black hole mass gap in independent analyses.
Load-bearing premise
The background model and search pipelines correctly quantify how often detector noise produces false candidates that pass the p_astro threshold.
What would settle it
An independent reanalysis of the O4b dataset that recovers substantially fewer than 161 candidates above the p_astro = 0.5 threshold after the same validation steps.
Figures
read the original abstract
Version 5.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog (GWTC-5.0) adds new candidates detected by the LIGO Virgo KAGRA network of observatories through the second part of the fourth observing run (O4b: 2024 April 10 15:00:00 to 2025 January 28 17:00:00 UTC) and four days of the preceding engineering run (2024 April 6 to 2024 April 10). We find 161 compact binary coalescence candidates that are identified by at least one of our search algorithms with a probability of astrophysical origin $p_\mathrm{astro} \geq 0.5$ and that are not vetoed during event validation. We also provide detailed source property measurements for 104 candidates that have a false-alarm rate < 1yr$^{-1}$. Based on the inferred component masses, all these candidates are consistent with signals from binary black holes. Median inferred component masses in the new candidates range from 5.14$M_\odot$ (GW241109_115924) to 70$M_\odot$ (GW241116_151753). Improvements in detector sensitivity allow us to observe compact binary coalescences with increasing clarity: 5 binary-black-hole signals have network signal-to-noise ratio exceeding 30, with a maximum to date of 76.9 for GW250114_082203. Such loud signals enable more precise studies of properties of their astrophysical sources and tests of general relativity. We also present updated results up to the first part of the fourth observing run, identifying 229 candidates. This brings the total number of transients in the cumulative GWTC having $p_\mathrm{astro} \geq 0.5$ to 390, further expanding the size of the catalog and our view of the gravitational-wave universe.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript presents GWTC-5.0, the updated Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog incorporating candidates from the second half of the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing run (O4b, April 2024–January 2025) plus four days of engineering run. It reports 161 new compact binary coalescence candidates identified by at least one search pipeline with p_astro ≥ 0.5 and not vetoed, all consistent with binary black hole signals on the basis of inferred component masses. Detailed source properties are given for the 104 events with false-alarm rate < 1 yr^{-1}. Median component masses for the new events range from 5.14 M_⊙ to 70 M_⊙; five events exceed network SNR = 30, with a maximum of 76.9. The cumulative catalog now contains 390 transients with p_astro ≥ 0.5.
Significance. If the reported selection and parameter-estimation results hold, the work materially enlarges the sample of confirmed binary black hole mergers, improving statistical power for population inference, rate measurements, and tests of general relativity with high-SNR events. The release follows the established LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA analysis framework used in prior GWTC versions and supplies the community with a larger, uniformly processed catalog for downstream astrophysical studies.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] §Abstract: the phrase 'all these candidates' in the sentence on mass consistency could be clarified to specify whether it refers to the full set of 161 or only the 104 with FAR < 1 yr^{-1}.
- [Abstract] The manuscript would benefit from an explicit statement of the total number of candidates that received full parameter estimation versus those retained only on the basis of p_astro.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their positive review of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. No major comments were provided in the report.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity in observational catalog release
full rationale
This paper is a standard observational catalog release (GWTC-5.0) that applies pre-established LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA search pipelines, background models, and event validation procedures to new O4b data. The reported counts (161 candidates with p_astro >= 0.5) and properties follow directly from fixed statistical thresholds and parameter estimation on independent detector data, without any self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claims to the paper's own inputs by construction. The mass consistency statements are outputs of standard inference, not circular derivations.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (2)
- p_astro threshold
- FAR threshold
axioms (2)
- domain assumption Detector noise is sufficiently well modeled by the search pipelines to compute reliable p_astro and FAR values.
- domain assumption General relativity and standard binary black hole waveform models are adequate for parameter estimation.
Forward citations
Cited by 27 Pith papers
-
AI-enabled gravitational-waves searches for binary neutron stars at optimal sensitivity
Aframe neural network achieves matched-filter sensitivity for binary neutron star GW searches at lower computational cost using heterodyning and a single GPU.
-
Joint inference of line-of-sight acceleration and orbital eccentricity in neutron-star--black-hole binaries
All five NSBH events are consistent with zero line-of-sight acceleration; the joint posterior for GW200105_162426 disfavors both zero LOSA and zero eccentricity at 90% credibility.
-
Tests of general relativity at the fourth post-Newtonian order with GW230627 and GW250114
Bayesian analysis of GW230627 and GW250114 finds no deviation from GR at 4PN and 4.5PN orders, setting the first empirical baseline with 90% intervals of order O(1)-O(10).
-
Horizon absorption in eccentric precessing binary black hole inspirals and its importance for gravitational wave data analysis
First leading-PN derivation of horizon absorption in eccentric precessing BBH inspirals, incorporated into pyEFPEHM, with estimates showing parameter biases in eccentric systems at moderate SNR.
-
Distinct spin properties and astrophysical origin of low mass binary black holes in gravitational wave data
Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of GWTC-5.0 data identifies a mass transition at 15.2 solar masses separating distinct effective-spin distributions, pointing to different formation channels for low-mass binary black holes.
-
Efficient Eccentric Effective-One-Body Dynamics via Near-Identity Averaging Transformations
Near-identity averaging transformations applied to osculating orbital elements reduce the computational cost of eccentric EOB inspirals by up to two orders of magnitude while maintaining accuracy for moderate to large...
-
Joint population and strong-lensing inference for resolved gravitational-wave events probes the black-hole merger rate beyond the peak of star formation
Joint strong-lensing and population inference on resolved gravitational-wave events finds no lensed events and tightens constraints on the black-hole merger rate peak redshift and high-redshift tail.
-
Getting Tilted: Random Walk of Binary Black Hole Spin-Orbit Alignment in Dense Star Clusters
Models BBH spin-orbit alignment as random walk on sphere, deriving exact distribution after n encounters and showing alignment survives several strong encounters before isotropy.
-
Improving low-latency multi-messenger follow-up of neutron star-black hole mergers with mode-by-mode filtering
Mode-by-mode filtering of higher-order modes enables low-latency marginalization over mode information in NSBH gravitational-wave signals, tightening constraints on distance, inclination, and secondary mass.
-
Quasinormal modes and tidal responses of black holes in generic anisotropic matter environments
A perturbative framework for black holes in anisotropic matter shows quasinormal modes dominated by gravitational redshift while tidal Love numbers exhibit order-unity deviations including vanishing and negative values.
-
No Evidence for Superradiant Axions in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA GWTC-5 Binary Black Hole Spins
Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of GWTC-5 binary black hole spins finds no evidence for superradiant axions and excludes masses 1.7e-14 to 3.3e-12 eV at 95% CL.
-
Smoking-gun evidence for hierarchical black-hole mergers
GWTC-5 population analysis finds high-spin black hole mass function traces low-spin remnant distribution with Bhattacharyya coefficient ~0.95, supporting hierarchical mergers and yielding a nuclear S-factor constraint.
-
A parametric signal plus noise inference framework for short duration non-Gaussian noise transients
Bilby-antiglitch jointly models astrophysical signals and quasi-physical glitches to recover true source properties from simulated gravitational wave data contaminated by loud non-Gaussian transients.
-
Twin Peaks: Resolving Features in the Binary Black Hole Mass Function with COSMIC-METISSE
New MESA stellar tracks with varied winds and convective mixing produce a primary black hole mass function with twin peaks near 8 and 13 solar masses in most variations, the higher peak dominated by mass-ratio-reversa...
-
Extended parameterized spin expansion formalism for ringdown analysis with GW250114
Extension of parameterized spin expansion formalism samples tilde ell and tilde p for GW250114 ringdown, showing prior-dominated tilde p posteriors and gamma-controlled weak upper bounds on tilde ell of about 83 km.
-
Population-level correlations in Bayesian statistics: an illustrative model for gravitational-wave astronomy
An idealized Gaussian model demonstrates that single-event correlations inflate uncertainties in population correlations and that catalog-wide correlated biases can be misread as population correlations.
-
Impact of the Einstein Telescope's duty cycle on the estimation of binary black holes parameters
ET-Δ outperforms ET-2L on luminosity distance and source-frame masses for BBH events because its redundancy produces higher multi-detector uptime under realistic duty-cycle modeling.
-
The Chirp-Mass Ladder: A New Rung Emerges
The chirp-mass distribution of GW-detected binary black holes shows a ladder of peaks doubling in mass, with a new intermediate peak at 19 solar masses confirming a prior prediction from the hierarchical merger model.
-
Intrinsic handedness in O1-O4a black-hole mergers: probing orbital precession, remnant retention in dense environments and cosmological mirror asymmetry
92% of 91 LIGO black hole mergers favor non-zero V_GW, constraining bound remnants to at most 8% and finding no cosmological handedness preference with average near zero.
-
Line-of-sight acceleration in compact binaries with higher harmonics and eccentricity
Implements consistent line-of-sight acceleration corrections in quasi-circular and eccentric GW waveform models, applies them to GWTC-3 events, and reports no substantial evidence for acceleration while warning of bia...
-
Modern tidal interaction models for rapid binary population synthesis: II. Binary black hole formation, mergers, and spins
Simulations with a new tidal model in COMPAS predict that merging binary black holes from isolated evolution are strongly biased to low effective spins, with one third below 0.05 and only 3% above 0.5, but the high-sp...
-
When the black holes align: a subpopulation of aligned massive binary black holes observed via gravitational waves
Non-parametric analysis of GWTC-5.0 data supports multiple subpopulations of binary black holes distinguished by effective spin, with one aligned subpopulation suggesting dynamical formation.
-
Fast targeted gravitational-wave followup search for compact binary mergers using GSTLAL pipeline
A targeted gravitational-wave search modifies the GstLAL likelihood ratio with a sky localization prior from EM triggers, showing improved detection efficiency in injection studies while controlling false alarms.
-
Evidence for additional structure in the effective spin distribution hints at multiple formation pathways in GWTC-5.0
GWTC-5.0 analysis finds evidence for structure beyond a non-skewed Gaussian bulk in χ_eff, with suggestive mass-dependent excess of positive over negative spins outside the bulk at 13:1 odds in one mass bin.
-
Statistical Estimation and Correction of Model-Measurement Bias in Time-Dependent Correction Factors of KAGRA
A rolling random-effects REML model estimates bias correction factors for TDCFs from calibration-line data, reducing deviations from SSCM references by up to 7% in KAGRA O4c data.
-
PyCBC Live Search for Compact Binary Mergers in Advanced LIGO and Virgo's Fourth Observing Run
PyCBC Live for O4 adds time-dependent background modeling, early warning search, and improved autogating, delivering sensitivity gains of 1.7-2.3x for coincident searches in mock data challenges.
-
The first decade of gravitational-wave measurements of black hole spins
A review summarizing formation-channel predictions, waveform effects, and population-level constraints on stellar-mass black hole spins from the first decade of gravitational-wave observations.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Aasi, J., Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., et al. 2015, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32, 074001, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001
-
[2]
GW230814: investigation of a loud gravitational-wave signal observed with a single detector
Abac, A. G., Abouelfettouh, I., Acernese, F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.07348, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.07348
work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.07348 2025
-
[3]
G., Abbott, R., Abe, H., et al
Abac, A. G., Abbott, R., Abe, H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 132, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad65ce
-
[4]
Abac, A. G., Abouelfettouh, I., Acernese, F., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.18082, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.18082 39 —. 2025b, PhRvL, 135, 111403, doi: 10.1103/kw5g-d732 —. 2025c, ApJL, 993, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae0d54 —. 2025d, PhRvD, 112, 102005, doi: 10.1103/wjdz-jdby —. 2025e, ApJL, 993, L25, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae0c9c
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.18082 2041
-
[5]
GWTC-4.0: Methods for Identifying and Characterizing Gravitational-wave Transients
Abac, A. G., Abouelfettouh, I., Acernese, F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.18081, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.18081 —. 2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.11703. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11703 —. 2026b, PhRvL, 136, 041403, doi: 10.1103/6c61-fm1n
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.18081 2025
-
[6]
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2016a, PhRvL, 116, 061102, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 —. 2016b, PhRvL, 116, 241102, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.241102 —. 2016c, Physical Review X, 6, 041015, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041015 —. 2016d, Physical Review X, 6, 041014, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041014 —. 2017a, PhRvL, 119, 161101, doi: 10...
-
[7]
P., et al., 2020, @doi [Living Reviews in Relativity] 10.1007/s41114-020-00026-9 , 23, 3
Abbott, B. P., et al. 2020, Living Rev. Rel., 23, 3, doi: 10.1007/s41114-020-00026-9
-
[8]
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2020, ApJL, 892, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f5
-
[9]
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., et al. 2021a, ApJL, 915, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac082e —. 2021b, Physical Review X, 11, 021053, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021053
-
[10]
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., et al. 2021c, PhRvD, 104, 122004, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.122004
-
[11]
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., et al. 2021d, ApJ, 921, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac17ea —. 2021e, PhRvL, 126, 241102, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.241102 —. 2021f, PhRvD, 104, 022004, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.022004 —. 2021g, PhRvD, 104, 022005, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.022005
-
[12]
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., et al. 2022a, PhRvL, 129, 061104, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.061104 —. 2022b, ApJ, 932, 133, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6ad0 —. 2023a, Physical Review X, 13, 041039, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039 —. 2023b, Physical Review X, 13, 011048, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048
-
[13]
2023c, MNRAS, 524, 5984, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad588
Abbott, R., Abe, H., Acernese, F., et al. 2023c, MNRAS, 524, 5984, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad588
-
[14]
2024, , 109, 022001, 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.022001
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., et al. 2024, PhRvD, 109, 022001, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.022001
-
[15]
2015, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32, 024001, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001
Acernese, F., Agathos, M., Agatsuma, K., et al. 2015, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32, 024001, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001
-
[16]
2023, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 40, 185005, 10.1088/1361-6382/acdf36
Acernese, F., Agathos, M., Ain, A., et al. 2023, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 40, 185005, doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/acdf36
-
[17]
2016, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 33, 175012, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/33/17/175012
Adams, T., Buskulic, D., Germain, V ., et al. 2016, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 33, 175012, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/33/17/175012
-
[18]
Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830
-
[19]
Ajith, P., Hannam, M., Husa, S., et al. 2011, PhRvL, 106, 241101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.241101
-
[20]
Akutsu, T., Ando, M., Arai, K., et al. 2021, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2021, 05A101, doi: 10.1093/ptep/ptaa125 Alléné, C., Aubin, F., Bentara, I., et al. 2025, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 42, 105009, doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/add234
-
[21]
doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1065 , adsurl =
Alsing, J., Silva, H. O., & Berti, E. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 1377, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1065 Álvarez-López, S., Liyanage, A., Ding, J., Ng, R., & McIver, J. 2024, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 41, 085007, doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/ad2194
-
[22]
Andres, N., Assiduo, M., Aubin, F., et al. 2022, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 39, 055002, doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/ac482a
-
[23]
Antoniadis, J., Tauris, T. M., Ozel, F., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1605.01665, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1605.01665
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.01665 2016
-
[24]
and Cutler, Curt and Sussman, Gerald J
Apostolatos, T. A., Cutler, C., Sussman, G. J., & Thorne, K. S. 1994, PhRvD, 49, 6274, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.6274
-
[25]
Areeda, J. S., Smith, J. R., Lundgren, A. P., et al. 2017, Astronomy and Computing, 18, 27, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2017.01.003
-
[26]
Ashton, G., & Talbot, C. 2021, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 507, 2037, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2236
-
[27]
Ashton, G., Thiele, S., Lecoeuche, Y ., McIver, J., & Nuttall, L. K. 2022, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 39, 175004, doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/ac8094 40
-
[28]
Ashton, G., Hübner, M., Lasky, P. D., et al. 2019, ApJS, 241, 27, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab06fc
-
[29]
2021, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 38, 095004, doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/abe913
Aubin, F., Brighenti, F., Chierici, R., et al. 2021, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 38, 095004, doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/abe913
-
[30]
2013, PhRvD, 87, 024035, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.024035
Baird, E., Fairhurst, S., Hannam, M., & Murphy, P. 2013, PhRvD, 87, 024035, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.024035
-
[31]
Berry, C. P. L., Mandel, I., Middleton, H., et al. 2015, ApJ, 804, 114, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/114
-
[32]
title Gravitational radiation from post-newtonian sources and inspiralling compact binaries
Blanchet, L. 2014, Living Reviews in Relativity, 17, 2, doi: 10.12942/lrr-2014-2
-
[33]
2012, ApJ, 748, 136, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/748/2/136
Cannon, K., Cariou, R., Chapman, A., et al. 2012, ApJ, 748, 136, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/748/2/136
-
[34]
2021, SoftwareX, 14, 100680, doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2021.100680
Cannon, K., Caudill, S., Chan, C., et al. 2021, SoftwareX, 14, 100680, doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2021.100680
-
[35]
2015, ApJL, 798, L17, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/798/1/L17
Chatziioannou, K., Cornish, N., Klein, A., & Yunes, N. 2015, ApJL, 798, L17, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/798/1/L17
-
[36]
Chatziioannou, K., Cornish, N., Wijngaarden, M., & Littenberg, T. B. 2021, PhRvD, 103, 044013, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.044013
-
[37]
S., Olsen, S., Roulet, J., et al
Chia, H. S., Olsen, S., Roulet, J., et al. 2022, PhRvD, 106, 024009, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.024009
-
[38]
2022, Reviews of Modern Physics, 94, 025001, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.94.025001
Christensen, N., & Meyer, R. 2022, Reviews of Modern Physics, 94, 025001, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.94.025001
-
[39]
2022, PhRvD, 105, 024023, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.024023
Chu, Q., Kovalam, M., Wen, L., et al. 2022, PhRvD, 105, 024023, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.024023
-
[40]
Ramis and Garc \' a-Quir \'o s, Cecilio and Ak c ay, Sarp and Bera, Sayantani
Bera, S. 2025, PhRvD, 111, 104019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.104019
-
[41]
Cornish, N. J., & Littenberg, T. B. 2015, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32, 135012, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/32/13/135012
-
[42]
Cornish, N. J., Littenberg, T. B., Bécsy, B., et al. 2021, PhRvD, 103, 044006, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.044006
-
[43]
Cutler, C., & Flanagan, É. E. 1994, PhRvD, 49, 2658, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.2658
-
[44]
Cutler, C., Apostolatos, T. A., Bildsten, L., et al. 1993, PhRvL, 70, 2984, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2984 Dal Canton, T., Nitz, A. H., Gadre, B., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 254, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2f9a Dal Canton, T., Nitz, A. H., Lundgren, A. P., et al. 2014, PhRvD, 90, 082004, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.082004
-
[45]
2001, PhRvD, 64, 124013, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.124013
Damour, T. 2001, PhRvD, 64, 124013, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.124013
-
[46]
S., Dent, T., Tápai, M., et al
Davies, G. S., Dent, T., Tápai, M., et al. 2020, PhRvD, 102, 022004, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.022004
-
[47]
Davis, D., Yarbrough, Z., Areeda, J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.16183. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16183
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
-
[48]
and Gair, Jonathan and Macke, Jakob H
Dax, M., Green, S. R., Gair, J., et al. 2021, Phys. Rev. Lett., 127, 241103, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.241103 Del Pozzo, W., Berry, C. P. L., Ghosh, A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 601, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1485 Di Renzo, F., Fidecaro, F., Razzano, M., & Sorrentino, N. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.15392, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2401.15392
-
[49]
2021, SoftwareX, 14, 100678, doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2021.100678
Drago, M., Klimenko, S., Lazzaro, C., et al. 2021, SoftwareX, 14, 100678, doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2021.100678
-
[50]
2020, Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 2, 015004, 10.1088/2632-2153/abab5f
Essick, R., Godwin, P., Hanna, C., Blackburn, L., & Katsavounidis, E. 2020, Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 2, 015004, doi: 10.1088/2632-2153/abab5f
-
[51]
Essick, R., Coughlin, M. W., Zevin, M., et al. 2025, PhRvD, 112, 102001, doi: 10.1103/44x3-hv3y Estellés, H., Buonanno, A., Enficiaud, R., Foo, C., & Pompili, L. 2026, PhRvD, 113, 044049, doi: 10.1103/pjbd-pjxn Estellés, H., Husa, S., Colleoni, M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 924, 79, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac33a0
-
[52]
2009, New Journal of Physics, 11, 123006, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/11/12/123006 —
Fairhurst, S. 2009, New Journal of Physics, 11, 123006, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/11/12/123006 —. 2011, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 28, 105021, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/28/10/105021
-
[53]
Farr, B., Berry, C. P. L., Farr, W. M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 825, 116, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/116
-
[54]
doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab12e3 , adsurl =
Farrow, N., Zhu, X.-J., & Thrane, E. 2019, ApJ, 876, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab12e3
-
[55]
Finn, L. S., & Chernoff, D. F. 1993, PhRvD, 47, 2198, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.47.2198
-
[56]
Fishbach, M., Holz, D. E., & Farr, B. 2017, ApJL, 840, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa7045
-
[57]
P., Hemming, G., Bizouard, M.-A., et al
Fisher, R. P., Hemming, G., Bizouard, M.-A., et al. 2021, SoftwareX, 14, 100677, doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2021.100677 García-Bellido, J., Nuño Siles, J. F., & Ruiz Morales, E. 2021, Physics of the Dark Universe, 31, 100791, doi: 10.1016/j.dark.2021.100791
-
[58]
Ghonge, S., Chatziioannou, K., Clark, J. A., et al. 2020, PhRvD, 102, 064056, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.064056
-
[59]
Glanzer, J., Banagiri, S., Coughlin, S. B., et al. 2023, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 40, 065004, doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/acb633
-
[60]
Green, R., Hoy, C., Fairhurst, S., et al. 2021, Phys. Rev. D, 103, 124023, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.124023
-
[61]
Grover, K., Fairhurst, S., Farr, B. F., et al. 2014, PhRvD, 89, 042004, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.042004
-
[62]
Gupta, T., & Cornish, N. J. 2024, PhRvD, 109, 064040, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.064040
-
[63]
Hamilton, E., Colleoni, M., Thompson, J. E., et al. 2026, PhRvD, 113, 084055, doi: 10.1103/kxsf-23rr
-
[64]
2020, PhRvD, 101, 022003, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.022003
Hanna, C., Caudill, S., Messick, C., et al. 2020, PhRvD, 101, 022003, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.022003
-
[65]
Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
-
[66]
Helmling-Cornell, A. F., Nguyen, P., Schofield, R. M. S., & Frey, R. 2024, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 41, 145003, doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/ad5139 41
-
[67]
Accurate modeling and mitigation of overlapping signals and glitches in gravitational-wave data
Hourihane, S., Chatziioannou, K., Wijngaarden, M., et al. 2022, PhRvD, 106, 042006, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.042006
-
[68]
Hoy, C., Fairhurst, S., & Mandel, I. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 111, 023037, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.023037
-
[69]
2021, SoftwareX, 15, 100765, doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2021.100765
Hoy, C., & Raymond, V . 2021, SoftwareX, 15, 100765, doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2021.100765
-
[70]
Huang, Y ., Middleton, H., Ng, K. K. Y ., Vitale, S., & Veitch, J. 2018, PhRvD, 98, 123021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.123021
-
[71]
Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
-
[72]
2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.04638, 10.48550/arXiv.2412.04638
Huxford, R., George, R., Trevor, M., Yarbrough, Z., & Godwin, P. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.04638, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.04638
-
[73]
K., Ghosh, A., Ghonge, S., et al
Johnson-McDaniel, N. K., Ghosh, A., Ghonge, S., et al. 2022, PhRvD, 105, 044020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.044020
-
[74]
New Methods for Offline GstLAL Analyses
Joshi, P., Tsukada, L., Hanna, C., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.06497, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.06497
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.06497 2025
-
[75]
1988, in ESA Special Publication, V ol
Kafka, P. 1988, in ESA Special Publication, V ol. 283, ESA Special Publication, ed. W. R. Burke, 121–130
1988
-
[76]
Kasliwal, M. M., & Nissanke, S. 2014, ApJL, 789, L5, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/789/1/L5
-
[77]
Kidder, L. E. 1995, PhRvD, 52, 821, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.821
-
[78]
2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2201.01096, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2201.01096
Klimenko, S. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2201.01096, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2201.01096
-
[79]
2004, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 21, S1819, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/21/20/025
Klimenko, S., & Mitselmakher, G. 2004, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 21, S1819, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/21/20/025
-
[80]
2005, PhRvD, 72, 122002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.122002
Klimenko, S., Mohanty, S., Rakhmanov, M., & Mitselmakher, G. 2005, PhRvD, 72, 122002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.122002
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.