Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Hallucinations in Large Multilingual Translation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.16104 v1 pith:INCAQ76L submitted 2023-03-28 cs.CL

Hallucinations in Large Multilingual Translation Models

classification cs.CL
keywords translationmodelshallucinationsmachinemultilingualacrosslanguagelanguages
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large-scale multilingual machine translation systems have demonstrated remarkable ability to translate directly between numerous languages, making them increasingly appealing for real-world applications. However, when deployed in the wild, these models may generate hallucinated translations which have the potential to severely undermine user trust and raise safety concerns. Existing research on hallucinations has primarily focused on small bilingual models trained on high-resource languages, leaving a gap in our understanding of hallucinations in massively multilingual models across diverse translation scenarios. In this work, we fill this gap by conducting a comprehensive analysis on both the M2M family of conventional neural machine translation models and ChatGPT, a general-purpose large language model~(LLM) that can be prompted for translation. Our investigation covers a broad spectrum of conditions, spanning over 100 translation directions across various resource levels and going beyond English-centric language pairs. We provide key insights regarding the prevalence, properties, and mitigation of hallucinations, paving the way towards more responsible and reliable machine translation systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Multi-Source Framework for Relational Validation of Large Language Models Using Expert-Curated Encyclopedic Sources

    cs.SI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The multi-source framework identifies a consistent relational deficit in LLMs, where they recognize domain concepts but fail to reproduce their relational structures when compared to expert encyclopedias across fields...

  2. A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions

    cs.CL 2023-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The paper surveys hallucination in LLMs with an innovative taxonomy, factors, detection methods, benchmarks, mitigation strategies, and open research directions.