Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.08883 v1 pith:IHAAFO4P submitted 2018-11-21 cs.CV

Rethinking ImageNet Pre-training

classification cs.CV
keywords pre-trainingimagenetmodelsresultstrainingcocodetectioneven
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We report competitive results on object detection and instance segmentation on the COCO dataset using standard models trained from random initialization. The results are no worse than their ImageNet pre-training counterparts even when using the hyper-parameters of the baseline system (Mask R-CNN) that were optimized for fine-tuning pre-trained models, with the sole exception of increasing the number of training iterations so the randomly initialized models may converge. Training from random initialization is surprisingly robust; our results hold even when: (i) using only 10% of the training data, (ii) for deeper and wider models, and (iii) for multiple tasks and metrics. Experiments show that ImageNet pre-training speeds up convergence early in training, but does not necessarily provide regularization or improve final target task accuracy. To push the envelope we demonstrate 50.9 AP on COCO object detection without using any external data---a result on par with the top COCO 2017 competition results that used ImageNet pre-training. These observations challenge the conventional wisdom of ImageNet pre-training for dependent tasks and we expect these discoveries will encourage people to rethink the current de facto paradigm of `pre-training and fine-tuning' in computer vision.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer

    cs.LG 2019-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    T5 casts all NLP tasks as text-to-text generation, systematically explores pre-training choices, and reaches strong performance on summarization, QA, classification and other tasks via large-scale training on the Colo...

  2. Cascade R-CNN: High Quality Object Detection and Instance Segmentation

    cs.CV 2019-06 accept novelty 7.0

    Cascade R-CNN uses a cascade of detectors trained with progressively higher IoU thresholds to resolve overfitting and quality mismatch, achieving state-of-the-art high-quality object detection and instance segmentatio...

  3. A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmark

    cs.CV 2019-10 accept novelty 6.0

    VTAB is a 19-task benchmark that measures representation quality by few-shot adaptation performance across diverse vision domains, with a controlled large-scale comparison of popular pretraining methods.

  4. Towards Adversarially Robust Object Detection

    cs.CV 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Develops a multi-task learning based adversarial training approach to improve robustness of object detectors to adversarial attacks, with experiments on PASCAL-VOC and MS-COCO.