Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Stellar Mass to Halo Mass Scaling Relation for X-ray Selected Low Mass Galaxy Clusters and Groups out to Redshift zapprox1

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1512.01244 v2 pith:GTTGDANG submitted 2015-12-03 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

Stellar Mass to Halo Mass Scaling Relation for X-ray Selected Low Mass Galaxy Clusters and Groups out to Redshift zapprox1

classification astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO
keywords massstarclustersredshiftrelationstellarscalingodot
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the stellar mass-halo mass scaling relation for 46 X-ray selected low-mass clusters or groups detected in the XMM-BCS survey with masses $2\times10^{13}M_{\odot}\lesssim M_{500}\lesssim2.5\times10^{14}M_{\odot}$ at redshift $0.1\le z \le1.02$. The cluster binding masses $M_{500}$ are inferred from the measured X-ray luminosities \Lx, while the stellar masses $M_{\star}$ of the galaxy populations are estimated using near-infrared imaging from the SSDF survey and optical imaging from the BCS survey. With the measured \Lx\ and stellar mass $M_{\star}$, we determine the best fit stellar mass-halo mass relation, accounting for selection effects, measurement uncertainties and the intrinsic scatter in the scaling relation. The resulting mass trend is $M_{\star}\propto M_{500}^{0.69\pm0.15}$, the intrinsic (log-normal) scatter is $\sigma_{\ln M_{\star}|M_{500}}=0.36^{+0.07}_{-0.06}$, and there is no significant redshift trend $M_{\star}\propto (1+z)^{-0.04\pm0.47}$, although the uncertainties are still large. We also examine $M_{\star}$ within a fixed projected radius of $0.5$~Mpc, showing that it provides a cluster binding mass proxy with intrinsic scatter of $\approx93\%$ (1$\sigma$ in $M_{500}$). We compare our $M_{\star}=M_{\star}(M_{500}, z)$ scaling relation from the XMM-BCS clusters with samples of massive, SZE-selected clusters ($M_{500}\approx6\times10^{14}M_{\odot}$) and low mass NIR-selected clusters ($M_{500}\approx10^{14}M_{\odot}$) at redshift $0.6\lesssim z \lesssim1.3$. After correcting for the known mass measurement systematics in the compared samples, we find that the scaling relation is in good agreement with the high redshift samples, suggesting that for both groups and clusters the stellar content of the galaxy populations within $R_{500}$ depends strongly on mass but only weakly on redshift out to $z\approx1$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.