Cognitive Warfare, Hybrid Pressure, and Sovereign Resilience: An Operations Research Framework Applied to the Iranian Case (2017--2026)

Nelson Maculan; Rahimeh Neamatian Monemi; Shahin Gelareh

arxiv: 2607.01894 · v1 · pith:GPX7WZGKnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · 🧮 math.OC

Cognitive Warfare, Hybrid Pressure, and Sovereign Resilience: An Operations Research Framework Applied to the Iranian Case (2017--2026)

Rahimeh Neamatian Monemi , Shahin Gelareh , Nelson Maculan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 08:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC

keywords cognitive warfarehybrid pressuredynamical systemsMarkov decision processinstitutional resilienceequilibrium stabilityoperations researchcollapse boundary

0 comments

The pith

A coupled system of continuous grievance and resilience dynamics with pressure chosen by an optimizing Markov decision process admits a locally stable equilibrium and computable collapse boundary.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out a framework for defender states under sustained hybrid pressure by treating grievance and institutional resilience as continuous slow-moving processes whose rates are calibrated from history. Pressure intensity at each step is selected by an optimizing Markov decision process rather than treated as fixed or exogenous. Existence and local stability of an equilibrium are proved, along with a formal distinction from ordinary feedback stability and from an isolated stationary Markov chain. The same boundary computation is applied to the Iranian case from 2017 to 2026, placing the calibrated state roughly twenty-five times above collapse. Validation on thirty randomised networks shows a greedy seeding policy reaching eighty-seven percent average penetration.

Core claim

The authors formulate a coupled dynamical system in which grievance and institutional resilience evolve continuously while pressure intensity is chosen by an optimising Markov decision process, prove existence and local stability of the resulting equilibrium, and prove a formal result distinguishing it from standard feedback-stability analysis and from a stationary Markov chain treated in isolation. They validate the framework computationally using thirty randomised network instances, full value iteration, and a documented case study of cognitive warfare directed at Iran (2017--2026). The historically calibrated case sits approximately twenty-five times above the computed operational collaps

What carries the argument

The coupled dynamical system of grievance and resilience processes driven by an optimizing Markov decision process for pressure intensity, which produces a locally stable equilibrium together with an independent collapse boundary.

If this is right

The equilibrium and boundary computation allows a practitioner to assess where any given case sits relative to collapse rather than relying on an unverified comparison of opposing pressure intensities.
A greedy seeding policy reaches eighty-seven percent average network penetration across the thirty randomised instances, significantly above a degree-centrality baseline.
The Iranian case from 2017 to 2026 sits approximately twenty-five times above the computed operational collapse boundary under the calibrated rates.
The equilibrium is formally distinct from both standard feedback-stability analysis and a stationary Markov chain considered in isolation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same boundary computation could be applied to other states facing hybrid pressure campaigns once their grievance and resilience rates are calibrated from local data.
Varying the reward structure inside the Markov decision process might identify pressure schedules that move the collapse boundary farther from observed states.
The network penetration results suggest that defensive resource allocation could be guided by the same greedy rule rather than centrality heuristics.

Load-bearing premise

The defender's institutional state can be represented as continuous slow-moving processes whose evolution rates can be calibrated to historical observations in a manner that yields an independent collapse boundary.

What would settle it

Re-running the value iteration on the Iranian calibration and finding that the equilibrium distance falls at or below the computed collapse boundary, or that small changes in the historical rate parameters destroy local stability of the equilibrium.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.01894 by Nelson Maculan, Rahimeh Neamatian Monemi, Shahin Gelareh.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Decision flow of the influence-maximisation study (§ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Minimum resilience ρmin as a function of the ARE ratio η = gB2/gR1, computed by direct integration of equations (9)–(10) at 35 grid points. The dashed horizontal line marks the critical threshold ρc = 0.60; the dotted vertical line marks η = 1 for reference. The marked point is the historical baseline calibration η = 1.571, well inside the stable region. Generated by run_sysdyn() in the companion script. 6… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Proxy-weighted Shapley decomposition of attacker instrument value (Table [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

A defending state facing sustained economic, media, and psychological pressure from an adversary that continuously re-optimises its campaign poses a problem that existing attacker-defender models in operations research do not directly resolve, because they treat the defender's state as a discrete allocation rather than a continuous, slow-moving institutional process. We formulate a coupled dynamical system in which grievance and institutional resilience evolve continuously while pressure intensity is chosen by an optimising Markov decision process, prove existence and local stability of the resulting equilibrium, and prove a formal result distinguishing it from standard feedback-stability analysis and from a stationary Markov chain treated in isolation. We validate the framework computationally using thirty randomised network instances, full value iteration, and a documented case study of cognitive warfare directed at Iran (2017--2026). The historically calibrated case sits approximately twenty-five times above the computed operational collapse boundary, and a greedy seeding policy reaches eighty-seven percent average network penetration across the randomised instances, significantly above a degree-centrality baseline. A practitioner can use the equilibrium and boundary computation to assess where a specific case sits relative to collapse, rather than relying on an unverified comparison between opposing pressure intensities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Coupled ODE-MDP model for state resilience under hybrid pressure with Iran case study, but calibration independence and proof details remain uncheckable from the abstract.

read the letter

The paper sets up a coupled system where grievance and institutional resilience evolve as continuous processes while an MDP chooses the attacker's pressure intensity over time. It claims proofs of existence and local stability for the equilibrium plus a formal distinction from ordinary feedback models or isolated Markov chains, then runs value iteration on thirty random networks and calibrates the whole thing to Iranian data from 2017-2026, reporting the case sits roughly twenty-five times above the computed collapse boundary and that a greedy policy hits 87 percent average penetration.

The integration of slow continuous defender dynamics with a re-optimizing attacker is the clearest addition beyond standard attacker-defender setups. The network validation and the concrete boundary comparison give readers something specific to evaluate rather than pure theory.

The soft spot is the calibration step. The 25-times claim and the equilibrium analysis both require that the collapse boundary emerge independently from the fitted ODE parameters and not depend on the MDP's optimal policy or value function. If the functional forms or fitting procedure tie the boundary to the optimized trajectory, the separation breaks and the result turns circular. The abstract supplies no equations, no proof sketches, and no calibration procedure, so none of this can be checked. The formal distinction result faces the same problem.

This is aimed at operations researchers working on security applications and at analysts who need quantitative ways to locate a state relative to institutional thresholds under sustained pressure. A reader who wants to see whether the math actually supports the separation would get value from the full derivations. It deserves peer review so the proofs and the independence of the boundary can be examined directly.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper formulates a coupled system of continuous-time ODEs for grievance and institutional resilience driven by an optimizing MDP that selects pressure intensity. It claims to prove existence and local stability of an equilibrium, a formal result separating the model from standard feedback stability and isolated Markov chains, and validates via 30 randomized network instances plus a historically calibrated Iranian case study (2017-2026) in which the case lies 25 times above the computed collapse boundary while a greedy policy achieves 87% average penetration.

Significance. If the equilibrium proofs are rigorous and the collapse boundary can be shown to be independent of the fitted MDP parameters, the framework supplies a concrete operations-research tool for positioning real cases relative to an operational threshold rather than relying on uncalibrated intensity comparisons. The computational validation on synthetic instances and the explicit calibration procedure are positive features that would support reproducibility if the parameter-fitting details and independence argument are fully documented.

major comments (3)

[Case study and calibration procedure] The central claim that the operational collapse boundary is independent of the MDP value function and optimal policy (required for the 25-times-above-boundary statement) is load-bearing for both the equilibrium analysis and the case-study conclusion, yet the abstract and calibration description supply no explicit verification that the fitted grievance/resilience rates produce a threshold unaffected by the reward function or transition parameters.
[Equilibrium existence and stability proofs] The formal result distinguishing the coupled system from standard feedback-stability analysis and from a stationary Markov chain treated in isolation must be stated as a numbered theorem with the precise assumption (e.g., slow time-scale separation or continuity of the defender state) that enables the separation; without this, the claimed novelty cannot be assessed.
[Computational validation] Table or figure reporting the 30-instance results: the 87% penetration figure for the greedy policy is compared to a degree-centrality baseline, but the variance, statistical significance, and exact definition of 'network penetration' are not supplied, weakening the computational validation claim.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states 'prove existence and local stability' but does not indicate whether the proofs are analytic or rely on numerical verification; a brief statement of the proof technique would improve clarity.
[Methods] Notation for the collapse boundary (denoted 'operational collapse boundary') should be introduced with an equation reference in the methods section rather than only in the case-study narrative.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for these constructive comments, which identify areas where additional formalization and documentation will strengthen the manuscript. We address each major point below and commit to the indicated revisions.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central claim that the operational collapse boundary is independent of the MDP value function and optimal policy (required for the 25-times-above-boundary statement) is load-bearing for both the equilibrium analysis and the case-study conclusion, yet the abstract and calibration description supply no explicit verification that the fitted grievance/resilience rates produce a threshold unaffected by the reward function or transition parameters.

Authors: The collapse boundary is obtained from the fixed-point and eigenvalue analysis of the continuous-time ODE subsystem for grievance and resilience; these rates are calibrated from historical data independently of the MDP reward function and transition kernel. The MDP selects pressure intensity but does not enter the boundary computation. We will insert a dedicated paragraph in Section 4.2 (Calibration) that (i) states this separation explicitly, (ii) shows the boundary formula depends only on the ODE parameters, and (iii) verifies numerically that altering the reward function leaves the boundary unchanged while the equilibrium trajectory does change. This addresses the load-bearing claim directly. revision: yes
Referee: The formal result distinguishing the coupled system from standard feedback-stability analysis and from a stationary Markov chain treated in isolation must be stated as a numbered theorem with the precise assumption (e.g., slow time-scale separation or continuity of the defender state) that enables the separation; without this, the claimed novelty cannot be assessed.

Authors: We agree that the separation result should be presented as a numbered theorem. The key enabling assumption is a two-time-scale separation: the defender's continuous-time state evolves on a slower scale than the MDP decision epochs, together with Lipschitz continuity of the resilience map. We will add Theorem 3.2 (Existence, Local Stability, and Separation) that states the coupled equilibrium exists and is locally asymptotically stable under these conditions, and that the equilibrium cannot be recovered from either the isolated ODE feedback loop or the stationary MDP alone. The proof sketch will be expanded in the appendix to make the time-scale assumption explicit. revision: yes
Referee: Table or figure reporting the 30-instance results: the 87% penetration figure for the greedy policy is compared to a degree-centrality baseline, but the variance, statistical significance, and exact definition of 'network penetration' are not supplied, weakening the computational validation claim.

Authors: We will add Table 5 reporting, for each of the 30 instances, the mean and standard deviation of network penetration (defined as the fraction of nodes whose grievance exceeds the activation threshold within the 50-step horizon) under the greedy policy and the degree-centrality baseline. We will also report paired t-test p-values and 95% confidence intervals. The definition of network penetration will be moved from the text into the table caption and the methods subsection for clarity. These additions directly address the missing statistical detail. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: mathematical formulation and proofs are independent of case calibration

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain begins with formulation of a coupled dynamical system (grievance/resilience as continuous ODEs, pressure via MDP), followed by claimed proofs of existence, local stability, and formal distinction from feedback stability or isolated Markov chains. These are presented as first-principles results. The Iranian case study applies historical calibration to report the 25-times-above-boundary positioning and 87% penetration, but this is an empirical application after the proofs, not a reduction of the equilibrium or stability claims to the fitted values. No equations or text in the abstract demonstrate that the collapse boundary depends on the optimal policy by construction, nor any self-citation load-bearing the central theorems. The framework remains self-contained against the external benchmarks of the stated proofs and randomized network validation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on several free parameters calibrated to the Iranian case study and on standard mathematical assumptions for dynamical systems and MDPs; the collapse boundary is a model-derived quantity without external falsifiable evidence.

free parameters (2)

grievance and resilience evolution rates
Rates governing the continuous dynamical system, calibrated to historical observations in the case study
MDP reward function and transition parameters
Parameters defining the optimizing pressure choices, tuned to match the calibrated case

axioms (2)

standard math Existence and local stability of equilibrium in the coupled dynamical system can be established via standard fixed-point or Lyapunov arguments
Invoked directly in the claimed proofs of existence and local stability
standard math The Markov decision process admits an optimal policy computable by value iteration on the network instances
Required for the computational validation step

invented entities (1)

operational collapse boundary no independent evidence
purpose: Threshold separating stable and collapsing regimes under sustained pressure
Defined from the equilibrium analysis of the coupled system

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5751 in / 1613 out tokens · 42585 ms · 2026-07-03T08:40:02.910932+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

[1]

https://acleddata.com/update/middle-east-special-issue-march-2026 Anonymous,

Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project. https://acleddata.com/update/middle-east-special-issue-march-2026 Anonymous,

2026
[2]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.05222

Cognitive warfare: Definition, framework, and case study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.05222. Axios,

work page arXiv
[3]

com/2026/04/08/exclusive-how-irans-supreme-leader-reached-a-truce-with-trump Bellman, R., 1957.Dynamic Programming

Exclusive: How Iran’s supreme leader reached a truce with Trump.https://www.axios. com/2026/04/08/exclusive-how-irans-supreme-leader-reached-a-truce-with-trump Bellman, R., 1957.Dynamic Programming. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Claverie, B., du Cluzel, F.,

2026
[4]

Clingendael Institute (Netherlands In- stitute of International Relations)

The invisible side of manipulation: How the Iranian regime sup- pressed #MahsaAmini on Persian Twitter. Clingendael Institute (Netherlands In- stitute of International Relations). https://www.clingendael.org/publication/ invisible-side-manipulation-how-iranian-regime-suppressed-mahsaamini-persian-twitter 25 Colbourn, C.J., 1987.The Combinatorics of Networ...

1987
[5]

Coser, L.A., 1956.The Functions of Social Conflict

Stochastic network interdiction.Operations Research 46 (2), 184–197. Coser, L.A., 1956.The Functions of Social Conflict. Free Press, Glencoe, IL. Center for Strategic and International Studies,

1956
[6]

Kepios / DataReportal.https://datareportal.com/reports/ digital-2022-iran Dempe, S., 2002.Foundations of Bilevel Programming

Digital 2022: Iran. Kepios / DataReportal.https://datareportal.com/reports/ digital-2022-iran Dempe, S., 2002.Foundations of Bilevel Programming. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. du Cluzel, F., 2021.Cognitive Warfare. NATO ACT Innovation Hub Working Paper. NATO Allied Com- mand Transformation.https://innovationhub-act.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/...

2022
[7]

Cognitive warfare: A conceptual analysis of the NATO ACT cognitive war- fare exploratory concept.Frontiers in Big Data7.https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2024.1452129 Farzanegan, M.R., Habibi, N.,

work page doi:10.3389/fdata.2024.1452129 2024
[8]

Alicante, A

The effect of international sanctions on the size of the middle class in Iran.European Journal of Political Economy90 (PB), 102749.https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ejpoleco.2025.102749 Farzanegan, M.R., Gutmann, J.,

work page doi:10.1016/j 2025
[9]

MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics No

International sanctions and internal conflict: the case of Iran. MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics No. 20-2024, Philipps-Universität Marburg.Working paper; not yet peer-reviewed. Gurr, T.R., 1970.Why Men Rebel. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Hunt, K., Zhuang, J.,

2024
[10]

European Journal of Operational Research313 (2), 401–417.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023

A review of attacker-defender games: Current state and paths forward. European Journal of Operational Research313 (2), 401–417.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023. 04.009 Bustamante-Faúndez, P., Bucarey, V., Labbé, M., Marianov, V., Ordóñez, F.,

work page doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2023 2023
[11]

The value of randomized strategies in distributionally robust risk-averse network interdiction problems.INFORMS Journal on Computing35 (1), 216–232.https://doi.org/ 10.1287/ijoc.2022.1257 Mahmoudzadeh Vaziri, S., Kuzgunkaya, O., Vidyarthi, N.,

work page doi:10.1287/ijoc.2022.1257 2022
[12]

https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0286 Anderson, E.G., Keith, D.R., Lopez, J.,

An exact algorithm for multicommodity network design under stochastic interdictions.INFORMS Journal on Computing37 (6), 1518–1541. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0286 Anderson, E.G., Keith, D.R., Lopez, J.,

work page doi:10.1287/ijoc.2023.0286 2023
[13]

House of Commons Library, 2026a

Opportunities for system dynamics research in operations management for public policy.Production and Operations Management32 (6), 1895–1920. House of Commons Library, 2026a. Israel/US-Iran conflict 2026: Background and UK response (CBP- 10521).https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10521/ House of Commons Library, 2026b. US-Iran cease...

1920
[14]

IMF Working Paper WP/2022/181, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC

Determinants of inflation in Iran and policies to curb it. IMF Working Paper WP/2022/181, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC. IMF via Worldometers,

2022
[15]

worldometers.info/gdp/iran-gdp/ bne IntelliNews,

Iran GDP 2026: World Economic Outlook, April 2026.https://www. worldometers.info/gdp/iran-gdp/ bne IntelliNews,

2026
[16]

iranintl.com/en/202411309637 Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H., 1976.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs

Q&A: All you need to know about Iran’s state broadcaster.https://www. iranintl.com/en/202411309637 Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H., 1976.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. Wiley, New York. Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, É.,

work page arXiv 1976
[17]

In:Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In:Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, New York, pp. 137–146.https://doi.org/10.1145/956750.956769 Lanchester, F.W., 1916.Aircraft in Warfare: The Dawn of the Fourth Arm. Constable, London. Laudati, D., Pesaran, M.H.,

work page doi:10.1145/956750.956769 1916
[18]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.09400

Identifying the effects of sanctions on the Iranian economy using newspaper coverage.Journal of Applied Econometrics38 (3), 271–294. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.09400. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.09400 Levy, J.S.,

work page arXiv
[19]

edu/publication/mahsa-amini-and-future-internet-repression-iran/ Miettinen, K., 1999.Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization

Mahsa Amini and the future of internet repression in Iran.https://mei. edu/publication/mahsa-amini-and-future-internet-repression-iran/ Miettinen, K., 1999.Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. Shapley, L.S.,

1999
[20]

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/oct/31/ uk-based-persian-language-tv-station-linked-to-saudi-funding Moaveni, A.,

2018
[21]

(Ed.), 2007.The Science of Social Influence: Advances and Future Progress

https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/24/middleeast/ saudi-iran-media-protests-mime-intl Pratkanis, A.R. (Ed.), 2007.The Science of Social Influence: Advances and Future Progress. Psychology Press, Hove, UK. ISBN: 978-1-84169-426-9. Small Wars Journal,

2022
[22]

https://smallwarsjournal.com/2026/04/03/winning-an-unpopular-war/ Sterman, J.D., 2000.Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World

Winning an unpopular war? The United States-Israel war against Iran. https://smallwarsjournal.com/2026/04/03/winning-an-unpopular-war/ Sterman, J.D., 2000.Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston. Stimson Center,

2026
[23]

https://www.stimson.org/2025/resisting-irans-high-tech-war-on-women-mahsa-amini/ Taylor, J.G., 1983.Lanchester Models of Warfare, 2 vols

Resisting Iran’s high-tech war on women three years after Mahsa Amini’s death. https://www.stimson.org/2025/resisting-irans-high-tech-war-on-women-mahsa-amini/ Taylor, J.G., 1983.Lanchester Models of Warfare, 2 vols. Operations Research Society of America, Arlington. 27 Wikipedia, 2026d. Economy of Iran.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Iran Wikipe...

work page arXiv 2025

[1] [1]

https://acleddata.com/update/middle-east-special-issue-march-2026 Anonymous,

Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project. https://acleddata.com/update/middle-east-special-issue-march-2026 Anonymous,

2026

[2] [2]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.05222

Cognitive warfare: Definition, framework, and case study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.05222. Axios,

work page arXiv

[3] [3]

com/2026/04/08/exclusive-how-irans-supreme-leader-reached-a-truce-with-trump Bellman, R., 1957.Dynamic Programming

Exclusive: How Iran’s supreme leader reached a truce with Trump.https://www.axios. com/2026/04/08/exclusive-how-irans-supreme-leader-reached-a-truce-with-trump Bellman, R., 1957.Dynamic Programming. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Claverie, B., du Cluzel, F.,

2026

[4] [4]

Clingendael Institute (Netherlands In- stitute of International Relations)

The invisible side of manipulation: How the Iranian regime sup- pressed #MahsaAmini on Persian Twitter. Clingendael Institute (Netherlands In- stitute of International Relations). https://www.clingendael.org/publication/ invisible-side-manipulation-how-iranian-regime-suppressed-mahsaamini-persian-twitter 25 Colbourn, C.J., 1987.The Combinatorics of Networ...

1987

[5] [5]

Coser, L.A., 1956.The Functions of Social Conflict

Stochastic network interdiction.Operations Research 46 (2), 184–197. Coser, L.A., 1956.The Functions of Social Conflict. Free Press, Glencoe, IL. Center for Strategic and International Studies,

1956

[6] [6]

Kepios / DataReportal.https://datareportal.com/reports/ digital-2022-iran Dempe, S., 2002.Foundations of Bilevel Programming

Digital 2022: Iran. Kepios / DataReportal.https://datareportal.com/reports/ digital-2022-iran Dempe, S., 2002.Foundations of Bilevel Programming. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. du Cluzel, F., 2021.Cognitive Warfare. NATO ACT Innovation Hub Working Paper. NATO Allied Com- mand Transformation.https://innovationhub-act.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/...

2022

[7] [7]

Cognitive warfare: A conceptual analysis of the NATO ACT cognitive war- fare exploratory concept.Frontiers in Big Data7.https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2024.1452129 Farzanegan, M.R., Habibi, N.,

work page doi:10.3389/fdata.2024.1452129 2024

[8] [8]

Alicante, A

The effect of international sanctions on the size of the middle class in Iran.European Journal of Political Economy90 (PB), 102749.https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ejpoleco.2025.102749 Farzanegan, M.R., Gutmann, J.,

work page doi:10.1016/j 2025

[9] [9]

MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics No

International sanctions and internal conflict: the case of Iran. MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics No. 20-2024, Philipps-Universität Marburg.Working paper; not yet peer-reviewed. Gurr, T.R., 1970.Why Men Rebel. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Hunt, K., Zhuang, J.,

2024

[10] [10]

European Journal of Operational Research313 (2), 401–417.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023

A review of attacker-defender games: Current state and paths forward. European Journal of Operational Research313 (2), 401–417.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023. 04.009 Bustamante-Faúndez, P., Bucarey, V., Labbé, M., Marianov, V., Ordóñez, F.,

work page doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2023 2023

[11] [11]

The value of randomized strategies in distributionally robust risk-averse network interdiction problems.INFORMS Journal on Computing35 (1), 216–232.https://doi.org/ 10.1287/ijoc.2022.1257 Mahmoudzadeh Vaziri, S., Kuzgunkaya, O., Vidyarthi, N.,

work page doi:10.1287/ijoc.2022.1257 2022

[12] [12]

https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0286 Anderson, E.G., Keith, D.R., Lopez, J.,

An exact algorithm for multicommodity network design under stochastic interdictions.INFORMS Journal on Computing37 (6), 1518–1541. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0286 Anderson, E.G., Keith, D.R., Lopez, J.,

work page doi:10.1287/ijoc.2023.0286 2023

[13] [13]

House of Commons Library, 2026a

Opportunities for system dynamics research in operations management for public policy.Production and Operations Management32 (6), 1895–1920. House of Commons Library, 2026a. Israel/US-Iran conflict 2026: Background and UK response (CBP- 10521).https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10521/ House of Commons Library, 2026b. US-Iran cease...

1920

[14] [14]

IMF Working Paper WP/2022/181, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC

Determinants of inflation in Iran and policies to curb it. IMF Working Paper WP/2022/181, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC. IMF via Worldometers,

2022

[15] [15]

worldometers.info/gdp/iran-gdp/ bne IntelliNews,

Iran GDP 2026: World Economic Outlook, April 2026.https://www. worldometers.info/gdp/iran-gdp/ bne IntelliNews,

2026

[16] [16]

iranintl.com/en/202411309637 Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H., 1976.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs

Q&A: All you need to know about Iran’s state broadcaster.https://www. iranintl.com/en/202411309637 Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H., 1976.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. Wiley, New York. Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, É.,

work page arXiv 1976

[17] [17]

In:Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In:Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, New York, pp. 137–146.https://doi.org/10.1145/956750.956769 Lanchester, F.W., 1916.Aircraft in Warfare: The Dawn of the Fourth Arm. Constable, London. Laudati, D., Pesaran, M.H.,

work page doi:10.1145/956750.956769 1916

[18] [18]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.09400

Identifying the effects of sanctions on the Iranian economy using newspaper coverage.Journal of Applied Econometrics38 (3), 271–294. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.09400. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.09400 Levy, J.S.,

work page arXiv

[19] [19]

edu/publication/mahsa-amini-and-future-internet-repression-iran/ Miettinen, K., 1999.Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization

Mahsa Amini and the future of internet repression in Iran.https://mei. edu/publication/mahsa-amini-and-future-internet-repression-iran/ Miettinen, K., 1999.Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. Shapley, L.S.,

1999

[20] [20]

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/oct/31/ uk-based-persian-language-tv-station-linked-to-saudi-funding Moaveni, A.,

2018

[21] [21]

(Ed.), 2007.The Science of Social Influence: Advances and Future Progress

https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/24/middleeast/ saudi-iran-media-protests-mime-intl Pratkanis, A.R. (Ed.), 2007.The Science of Social Influence: Advances and Future Progress. Psychology Press, Hove, UK. ISBN: 978-1-84169-426-9. Small Wars Journal,

2022

[22] [22]

https://smallwarsjournal.com/2026/04/03/winning-an-unpopular-war/ Sterman, J.D., 2000.Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World

Winning an unpopular war? The United States-Israel war against Iran. https://smallwarsjournal.com/2026/04/03/winning-an-unpopular-war/ Sterman, J.D., 2000.Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston. Stimson Center,

2026

[23] [23]

https://www.stimson.org/2025/resisting-irans-high-tech-war-on-women-mahsa-amini/ Taylor, J.G., 1983.Lanchester Models of Warfare, 2 vols

Resisting Iran’s high-tech war on women three years after Mahsa Amini’s death. https://www.stimson.org/2025/resisting-irans-high-tech-war-on-women-mahsa-amini/ Taylor, J.G., 1983.Lanchester Models of Warfare, 2 vols. Operations Research Society of America, Arlington. 27 Wikipedia, 2026d. Economy of Iran.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Iran Wikipe...

work page arXiv 2025