REVIEW 13 cited by
A Survey on Multi-view Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Survey on Multi-view Learning
read the original abstract
In recent years, a great many methods of learning from multi-view data by considering the diversity of different views have been proposed. These views may be obtained from multiple sources or different feature subsets. In trying to organize and highlight similarities and differences between the variety of multi-view learning approaches, we review a number of representative multi-view learning algorithms in different areas and classify them into three groups: 1) co-training, 2) multiple kernel learning, and 3) subspace learning. Notably, co-training style algorithms train alternately to maximize the mutual agreement on two distinct views of the data; multiple kernel learning algorithms exploit kernels that naturally correspond to different views and combine kernels either linearly or non-linearly to improve learning performance; and subspace learning algorithms aim to obtain a latent subspace shared by multiple views by assuming that the input views are generated from this latent subspace. Though there is significant variance in the approaches to integrating multiple views to improve learning performance, they mainly exploit either the consensus principle or the complementary principle to ensure the success of multi-view learning. Since accessing multiple views is the fundament of multi-view learning, with the exception of study on learning a model from multiple views, it is also valuable to study how to construct multiple views and how to evaluate these views. Overall, by exploring the consistency and complementary properties of different views, multi-view learning is rendered more effective, more promising, and has better generalization ability than single-view learning.
Forward citations
Cited by 13 Pith papers
-
Near-Exponential Convergence Rates for kNN Classification based on Boltzmann Margin
Introduces Boltzmann margin to prove near-exponential convergence rates for kNN classification.
-
From Layers to Networks: Comparing Neural Representations via Diffusion Geometry
Develops multi-scale and alternating-diffusion fused variants of CKA and distance correlation via Markov matrices for neural representation comparison, reporting state-of-the-art results on ReSi and OOD benchmarks.
-
An Information-Geometric Justification for Composite Coherence in Event-Based Narrative Extraction
The paper justifies the composite coherence metric in event-based narrative extraction via an information-geometric decomposition on the product manifold and an axiomatic uniqueness proof for the geometric mean.
-
Consistency Training Can Entrench Misalignment
Consistency training suppresses reward hacking and emergent misalignment but amplifies sycophancy in controlled model organisms, driven by labeling-induced distribution shifts rather than selection operators.
-
Multimodality Stacking with Blockwise missing values and application to the PIONeeR biomarkers study for prediction of resistance to immunotherapy
MSB is a late-fusion stacking framework for multimodal survival prediction under blockwise missingness that improves C-index over baselines on the PIONeeR lung cancer immunotherapy dataset.
-
Gromov-Wasserstein Methods for Multi-View Relational Embedding and Clustering
Bary-GWMDS computes Gromov-Wasserstein barycenters of distance matrices to produce stable consensus embeddings from multi-view relational data, and Mean-GWMDS-C averages distances for reduced-support clustering.
-
Structure-Preserving Multi-View Embedding Using Gromov-Wasserstein Optimal Transport
Two Gromov-Wasserstein optimal transport strategies, Mean-GWMDS and Multi-GWMDS, are introduced for structure-preserving multi-view embeddings.
-
The Multi-View Paradigm Shift in MRI Radiomics: Predicting MGMT Methylation in Glioblastoma
Multi-view VAE fuses T1Gd and FLAIR radiomics to predict MGMT methylation status in GBM with test AUC 0.77, outperforming baseline (0.54) and tuned (0.64) radiomics models.
-
Missing Pattern Tree based Decision Grouping and Ensemble for Enhancing Pair Utilization in Deep Incomplete Multi-View Clustering
A missing-pattern tree groups data by missing patterns for per-group clustering, followed by uncertainty-weighted ensemble and knowledge distillation to better exploit available pairs in incomplete multi-view clustering.
-
Multimodal and Multi-view Models for Emotion Recognition
Multimodal training with attention and contrastive multi-view learning improves both combined and acoustic-only emotion recognition on IEMOCAP over prior acoustic baselines.
-
Beyond Semantics: An Evidential Reasoning-Aware Multi-View Learning Framework for Trustworthy Mental Health Prediction
A multi-view evidential framework combines semantic and reasoning information to improve accuracy and provide trustworthy uncertainty estimates for mental health prediction on text data.
-
Shared Generative Latent Representation Learning for Multi-view Clustering
A shared generative latent representation learning method for multi-view clustering that models data with a mixture of Gaussians using deep networks to capture view correlations.
-
Intrinsic Weight Learning Approach for Multi-view Clustering
A re-weighted weight learning method for multi-view clustering that connects views via a single Laplacian-rank-constrained graph.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.