Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Highly Linear Calibration Metric for TES X-ray Microcalorimeters

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1808.00623 v1 pith:E7AJZCT7 submitted 2018-08-02 physics.ins-det

A Highly Linear Calibration Metric for TES X-ray Microcalorimeters

classification physics.ins-det
keywords calibrationgammajoulelinearmetricofphfunctiondata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Transition-edge sensor X-ray microcalorimeters are usually calibrated empirically, as the most widely-used calibration metric, optimal filtered pulse height (OFPH), in general has an unknown dependance on photon energy, $E_{\gamma}$. Because the calibration function can only be measured at specific points where photons of a known energy can be produced, this unknown dependence of OFPH on $E_{\gamma}$ leads to calibration errors and the need for time-intensive calibration measurements and analysis. A calibration metric that is nearly linear as a function of $E_{\gamma}$ could help alleviate these problems. In this work, we assess the linearity of a physically motivated calibration metric, $E_{Joule}$. We measure calibration pulses in the range 4.5 keV$<$$E_{\gamma}$$<$9.6 keV with detectors optimized for 6 keV photons to compare the linearity properties of $E_{Joule}$ to OFPH. In these test data sets, we find that $E_{Joule}$ fits a linear function an order of magnitude better than OFPH. Furthermore, calibration functions using $E_{J}$, an optimized version of $E_{Joule}$, are linear within the 2-3 eV noise of the data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.