pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.01720 · v1 · pith:C3L4CBSOnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.supr-con

Ultrasonic Observation of Slowing Down of Multipole Fluctuations in Sr₂RuO₄

Ryosuke Kurihara , Mitsuhiro Akatsu , Shunsuke Yaoita , Keisuke Mitsumoto , Yuichi Nemoto , Yoshiyuki Yoshida , Hiroshi Yaguchi , Terutaka Goto This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 06:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con
keywords Sr2RuO4ultrasonic attenuationmultipole fluctuationselectric hexadecapoleLandau-Khalatnikov relaxationunconventional superconductivity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ultrasonic attenuation in Sr2RuO4 rises near Tc due to slowing electric hexadecapole fluctuations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports ultrasonic measurements on Sr2RuO4 showing an increase in the in-plane transverse attenuation coefficient as temperature approaches the superconducting transition at 1.4 K. This attenuation follows a Landau-Khalatnikov frequency dependence with a relaxation time of about 10 to the minus 10 seconds. Applying a 10 T magnetic field suppresses the superconducting transition yet the attenuation increase continues down to low temperatures. Group-theoretical analysis leads the authors to propose that electric hexadecapole fluctuations are responsible for the slowing down. The work connects these multipole degrees of freedom to the material's multi-component superconducting order parameter.

Core claim

Ultrasonic attenuation measurements reveal a Landau-Khalatnikov-type slowing down of fluctuations associated with multipole degrees of freedom in Sr2RuO4 near Tc; the authors propose via group theory that the electric hexadecapole plays the central role, and note that the effect persists when a magnetic field suppresses the superconducting transition.

What carries the argument

The electric hexadecapole, identified by group-theoretical considerations as the multipole degree of freedom whose fluctuations produce the observed ultrasonic relaxation.

If this is right

  • The slowing down of fluctuations continues to low temperatures even when the superconducting transition is suppressed by a 10 T magnetic field.
  • The relaxation process has a characteristic time of approximately 10^{-10} s.
  • Group theory assigns the electric hexadecapole the leading role among multipole degrees of freedom.
  • The multipole fluctuations are linked to the multi-component character of the superconducting order parameter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same ultrasonic signature could appear in other layered materials hosting multipolar fluctuations near a phase transition.
  • If the hexadecapole assignment holds, symmetry-selective probes such as polarized Raman scattering could test it directly in Sr2RuO4.
  • The persistence of the effect under field suppression suggests multipole dynamics are at least partly independent of the superconducting condensate itself.

Load-bearing premise

The observed increase in ultrasonic attenuation is caused by slowing multipole fluctuations rather than other electronic, magnetic, or lattice contributions.

What would settle it

If ultrasonic attenuation measured at multiple frequencies shows no shift in its temperature dependence consistent with a 10^{-10} s relaxation time, or if the increase vanishes under conditions where hexadecapole fluctuations are symmetry-forbidden but other degrees of freedom remain active.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.01720 by Hiroshi Yaguchi, Keisuke Mitsumoto, Mitsuhiro Akatsu, Ryosuke Kurihara, Shunsuke Yaoita, Terutaka Goto, Yoshiyuki Yoshida, Yuichi Nemoto.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) shows the temperature dependence of the change in the ultrasonic attenuation coefficients of Sr2RuO4. We observed a significant increase in ∆αT from approxi￾mately 4000 dB/m at 15 K to about 16000 dB/m near Tc = 1.42 K. This attenuation coefficient corresponds to the elastic constant CT = (C11 − C12) /2, associated with in-plane trans￾verse ultrasonic waves with propagation direction q//[110] and polar… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (color online) Temperature dependence of (a) the ultrasonic attenuation coefficient αT and (b) the change in the elastic constant CT = (C11 − C12) /2 of Sr2RuO4 measured at several ultrasonic frequencies. Panels (c) and (d) show the temperature dependence of the change in the ultrasonic attenuation coefficient ∆αT and the elastic constant CT, respectively, measured at an ultrasonic frequency of 121 MHz und… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (color online) Temperature dependence of the relaxation time τ cal￾culated from the ultrasonic attenuation coefficient αT shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We performed ultrasonic measurements on the unconventional superconductor Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ to investigate the dynamical properties of the electronic states near its superconducting transition temperature, $T_\mathrm{c} = 1.4$ K. We observed an increase in the in-plane transverse ultrasonic attenuation coefficient as the temperature approached $T_\mathrm{c}$. The ultrasonic attenuation exhibited a Landau-Khalatnikov-type ultrasonic frequency dependence with a typical relaxation time of approximately $10^{-10}$ s. Under an applied magnetic field of 10 T, the superconducting transition was suppressed. However, the ultrasonic attenuation coefficient exhibited an increase down to low temperatures, indicating the slowing down of fluctuations associated with multipole degrees of freedom. Based on group-theoretical considerations, we propose that the electric hexadecapole plays a crucial role in the slowing down. Furthermore, we discuss the relationship between multi-component superconducting order parameters and multipole degrees of freedom.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports ultrasonic measurements on Sr₂RuO₄ near its superconducting transition at Tc = 1.4 K. An increase is observed in the in-plane transverse ultrasonic attenuation coefficient that exhibits Landau-Khalatnikov frequency dependence with a relaxation time of approximately 10^{-10} s. This feature persists under a 10 T magnetic field that suppresses superconductivity, which the authors interpret as evidence for slowing multipole fluctuations. Using group-theoretical considerations, they propose that the electric hexadecapole is the relevant degree of freedom and discuss its possible connection to multi-component superconducting order parameters.

Significance. If the central interpretive claim holds, the work would provide experimental evidence linking ultrasonic attenuation to multipolar electronic fluctuations in Sr₂RuO₄ that survive above the superconducting transition. The persistence of the relaxation under fields that destroy superconductivity is a potentially useful observation for distinguishing electronic from superconducting contributions. The group-theory proposal, if developed further, could connect to ongoing discussions of the pairing symmetry in this material.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract/Discussion] Abstract and Discussion: The proposal that the electric hexadecapole plays a crucial role rests on an unspecified group-theoretical assignment. No explicit symmetry analysis, irreducible representation table, or derivation is supplied showing how the observed ultrasonic mode transforms under the point group and matches the hexadecapole; this step is load-bearing for the manuscript's main conclusion.
  2. [Results] Results section: The reported increase in attenuation and the Landau-Khalatnikov fit are presented without error bars on the data points, uncertainties on the extracted relaxation time, or quantitative comparison against alternative explanations (e.g., other multipole channels or residual lattice/magnetic contributions). This absence limits assessment of whether the slowing-down signal is robust enough to support the multipole interpretation.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states a typical relaxation time of approximately 10^{-10} s but does not specify the ultrasonic frequencies employed or the fitting procedure; adding this information would allow readers to reproduce the time-scale extraction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract/Discussion] Abstract and Discussion: The proposal that the electric hexadecapole plays a crucial role rests on an unspecified group-theoretical assignment. No explicit symmetry analysis, irreducible representation table, or derivation is supplied showing how the observed ultrasonic mode transforms under the point group and matches the hexadecapole; this step is load-bearing for the manuscript's main conclusion.

    Authors: We agree that the group-theoretical assignment requires explicit documentation to support the central claim. The revised manuscript will include a dedicated symmetry analysis under the D4h point group of Sr2RuO4. This will specify the irreducible representations, show the transformation properties of the in-plane transverse ultrasonic strain, and derive its coupling to the electric hexadecapole, including the relevant irrep matching. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section: The reported increase in attenuation and the Landau-Khalatnikov fit are presented without error bars on the data points, uncertainties on the extracted relaxation time, or quantitative comparison against alternative explanations (e.g., other multipole channels or residual lattice/magnetic contributions). This absence limits assessment of whether the slowing-down signal is robust enough to support the multipole interpretation.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original presentation omits error bars, fit uncertainties, and explicit comparisons to alternatives. The revised Results section will add error bars to the attenuation data, report uncertainties on the extracted relaxation time of ~10^{-10} s, and include a quantitative discussion of why other multipole channels or lattice/magnetic contributions are less consistent with the observed field-independent slowing down. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental observation plus group-theory proposal

full rationale

The paper is an experimental report of ultrasonic attenuation data exhibiting Landau-Khalatnikov relaxation that persists under 10 T. The central interpretive step assigns the fluctuations to the electric hexadecapole via group-theoretical considerations presented explicitly as a proposal. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce this assignment or the observed slowing to a tautology or input by construction. The derivation chain consists of direct measurement plus an external symmetry argument and does not contain any of the enumerated circular patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, mathematical axioms, or new postulated entities beyond the interpretive proposal of hexadecapole involvement.

invented entities (1)
  • electric hexadecapole no independent evidence
    purpose: to account for the slowing down of fluctuations observed in ultrasonic attenuation
    Proposed on the basis of group-theoretical considerations; no independent falsifiable prediction or evidence supplied in the abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5731 in / 1211 out tokens · 35748 ms · 2026-07-03T06:22:56.566300+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Introduction Since its discovery, superconductivity has been the subject of intensive research in fundamental physics. Understanding the mechanism of superconductivity can lead to the discovery of new types of superconductors with high transition temper- atures.1–5) Superconductivity also plays an essential role in industrial applications, including super...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    An X-ray back-scattering method with a Laue camera was used to char- acterize the crystallographic orientations

    Experimental setup Single crystals of Sr 2RuO4 were grown by the floating- zone method using an ellipsoidal image furnace. An X-ray back-scattering method with a Laue camera was used to char- acterize the crystallographic orientations. The mass density, ρ=5.96 g/cm 3,47) and the ultrasonic velocity,v, were used to estimate the elastic constant,C=ρv 2. X-c...

  3. [3]

    We observed a significant increase in∆α T from approxi- mately 4000 dB/m at 15 K to about 16000 dB/m nearT c = 1.42 K

    Results Figure 1(a) shows the temperature dependence of the change in the ultrasonic attenuation coefficients of Sr2RuO4. We observed a significant increase in∆α T from approxi- mately 4000 dB/m at 15 K to about 16000 dB/m nearT c = 1.42 K. This attenuation coefficient corresponds to the elastic constantC T = (C11 −C 12) /2, associated with in-plane trans...

  4. [4]

    [1 10]C T = (C11 −C 12) /2 T

  5. [5]

    [010]C 66 T ΔC / C 151050 T (K) 0.2%(b) C TC1 1C4 4C6 6 16012080400Δα (10 2 dB/m) α T , 150 MHz α1 1 , 108 MHz α4 4 , 157 MHz α6 6 , 158 MHzSr 2 RuO 4 Tc = 1.42 K (a) Fig. 1.(Color online) (a) Temperature dependence of the change in the ultrasonic attenuation coefficients∆αT,∆α 11,∆α 44, and∆α 66, and (b) the relative change in the elastic constants∆C T/C...

  6. [6]

    Equation (2) reproduces well the temperature dependence of the relaxation time aboveT c, as shown in Fig

    Analysis and Discussion To analyze the temperature dependence ofτin the normal state, we employ the following phenomenological description for the relaxation time:45, 50) τ=τ 0ε−zν =τ 0 T−T 0 c T 0c −zν .(2) Here,τ 0 is a constant,ε= T−T 0 c /T 0 c is the reduced tem- perature,T 0 c is the critical temperature,νis the critical expo- nent for the correlati...

  7. [7]

    Conclusion and perspective In this study, we performed ultrasonic measurements on the unconventional superconductor Sr 2RuO4. We found that the ultrasonic attenuation coefficientαT for the in-plane trans- verse ultrasonic waves associated with the elastic constant CT = (C11 −C 12) /2 exhibits an anomalous increase at low temperatures, while the elastic so...

    2014

  8. [8]

    N. W. Ashcroft: Phys. Rev. Lett.92(2004) 187002

    2004

  9. [9]

    Drozdov, M

    A. Drozdov, M. Eremets, I. Troyan, V . Ksenofontov, and S. I. Shylin: Nature525(2015) 73

    2015

  10. [10]

    P. W. Anderson: Science235(1987) 1196

    1987

  11. [11]

    Steglich, J

    F. Steglich, J. Aarts, C. D. Bredl, W. Lieke, D. Meschede, W. Franz, and H. Sch¨afer: Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 1892

    1979

  12. [12]

    Kamihara, T

    Y . Kamihara, T. Watanabe, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono: Journal of the American Chemical Society130(2008) 3296

    2008

  13. [13]

    Maeda and Y

    H. Maeda and Y . Yanagisawa: IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.24(2013) 1

    2013

  14. [14]

    Y . Y . Gao, M. A. Rol, S. Touzard, and C. Wang: PRX Quantum2(2021) 040202

    2021

  15. [15]

    Tomikawa

    Y . Tomikawa. Toyota Times: Breaking Conventional Wisdom with the Superconductor×Hydrogen Engine - Two Years of Development. https://toyotatimes.jp/en/newscast/157.html. Accessed: Feb. 17, 2026

    2026

  16. [16]

    Ishida, Y

    K. Ishida, Y . Kitaoka, N. Ogata, T. Kamino, K. Asayama, J. R. Cooper, and N. Athanassopoulou: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.62(1993) 2803

    1993

  17. [17]

    Rossat-Mignod, L

    J. Rossat-Mignod, L. Regnault, C. Vettier, P. Bourges, P. Burlet, J. Bossy, J. Henry, and G. Lapertot: Phys. C: Supercond.185-189(1991) 86

    1991

  18. [18]

    Shishido, R

    H. Shishido, R. Settai, H. Harima, and Y . ¯Onuki: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.74 (2005) 1103

    2005

  19. [19]

    Yoshizawa, D

    M. Yoshizawa, D. Kimura, T. Chiba, S. Simayi, Y . Nakanishi, K. Kihou, C.-H. Lee, A. Iyo, H. Eisaki, M. Nakajima, and S.-i. Uchida: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.81(2012) 024604

    2012

  20. [20]

    Ishida, H

    K. Ishida, H. Mukuda, Y . Kitaoka, K. Asayama, Z. Mao, Y . Mori, and Y . Maeno: Nature396(1998) 658

    1998

  21. [21]

    Ghosh, A

    S. Ghosh, A. Shekhter, F. Jerzembeck, N. Kikugawa, D. A. Sokolov, M. Brando, A. Mackenzie, C. W. Hicks, and B. Ramshaw: Nat. Phys. 17(2021) 199

    2021

  22. [22]

    Benhabib, C

    S. Benhabib, C. Lupien, I. Paul, L. Berges, M. Dion, M. Nardone, A. Zi- touni, Z. Mao, Y . Maeno, A. Georges, L. Taillefer, and C. Proust: Nat. Phys.17(2021) 194

    2021

  23. [23]

    Maeno, H

    Y . Maeno, H. Hashimoto, K. Yoshida, S. Nishizaki, T. Fujita, J. Bed- norz, and F. Lichtenberg: Nature372(1994) 532

    1994

  24. [24]

    A. P. Mackenzie, R. K. W. Haselwimmer, A. W. Tyler, G. G. Lonzarich, Y . Mori, S. Nishizaki, and Y . Maeno: Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 161

    1998

  25. [25]

    Bergemann, S

    C. Bergemann, S. R. Julian, A. P. Mackenzie, S. NishiZaki, and Y . Maeno: Phys. Rev. Lett.84(2000) 2662

    2000

  26. [26]

    Oguchi: Phys

    T. Oguchi: Phys. Rev. B51(1995) 1385

    1995

  27. [27]

    Tamai, M

    A. Tamai, M. Zingl, E. Rozbicki, E. Cappelli, S. Ricc `o, A. de la Torre, S. McKeown Walker, F. Y . Bruno, P. D. C. King, W. Meevasana, M. Shi, M. Radovi´c, N. C. Plumb, A. S. Gibbs, A. P. Mackenzie, C. Berthod, H. U. R. Strand, M. Kim, A. Georges, and F. Baumberger: Phys. Rev. X9(2019) 021048

    2019

  28. [28]

    Maeno, S

    Y . Maeno, S. Yonezawa, and A. Ramires: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.93(2024) 062001

    2024

  29. [29]

    A. P. Mackenzie, T. Scaffidi, C. W. Hicks, and Y . Maeno: npj Quant. Mater.2(2017) 40

    2017

  30. [30]

    Pustogow, Y

    A. Pustogow, Y . Luo, A. Chronister, Y .-S. Su, D. Sokolov, F. Jerzem- beck, A. P. Mackenzie, C. W. Hicks, N. Kikugawa, S. Raghu, E. D. Bauer, and S. E. Brown: Nature574(2019) 72

    2019

  31. [31]

    Ishida, M

    K. Ishida, M. Manago, K. Kinjo, and Y . Maeno: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.89 (2020) 034712

    2020

  32. [32]

    Maeno, A

    Y . Maeno, A. Ikeda, and G. Mattoni: Nat. Phys.20(2024) 1712

    2024

  33. [33]

    Kittaka, Y

    S. Kittaka, Y . Kono, T. Sakakibara, N. Kikugawa, S. Uji, D. A. Sokolov, and K. Machida: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.95(2026) 014704

    2026

  34. [34]

    Matsuki, R

    H. Matsuki, R. Khasanov, J. A. Krieger, T. J. Hicken, K. Yuchi, J. S. Bobowski, G. Mattoni, A. Ikeda, R. Okuma, H. Luetkens, and Y . Maeno: Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 066001

    2026

  35. [35]

    Matsui, M

    H. Matsui, M. Yamaguchi, Y . Yoshida, A. Mukai, R. Settai, Y . ¯Onuki, H. Takei, and N. Toyota: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.67(1998) 3687

    1998

  36. [36]

    Okuda, T

    N. Okuda, T. Suzuki, Z. Mao, Y . Maeno, and T. Fujita: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.71(2002) 1134

    2002

  37. [37]

    Lupien, W

    C. Lupien, W. A. MacFarlane, C. Proust, L. Taillefer, Z. Q. Mao, and Y . Maeno: Phys. Rev. Lett.86(2001) 5986

    2001

  38. [38]

    Lupien: PhD theris, University of Toronto (2002)

    C. Lupien: PhD theris, University of Toronto (2002)

    2002

  39. [39]

    Matsui, Y

    H. Matsui, Y . Yoshida, A. Mukai, R. Settai, Y . ¯Onuki, H. Takei, N. Kimura, H. Aoki, and N. Toyota: Phys. Rev. B63(2001) 060505

    2001

  40. [40]

    L ¨uthi:Physical Acoustics in the Solid State(Springer Series in Solid- State Sciences

    B. L ¨uthi:Physical Acoustics in the Solid State(Springer Series in Solid- State Sciences. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006), Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences

    2006

  41. [41]

    Steppke, L

    A. Steppke, L. Zhao, M. E. Barber, T. Scaffidi, F. Jerzembeck, H. Ros- ner, A. S. Gibbs, Y . Maeno, S. H. Simon, A. P. Mackenzie, and C. W. Hicks: Science355(2017) eaaf9398

    2017

  42. [42]

    C. W. Hicks, D. O. Brodsky, E. A. Yelland, A. S. Gibbs, J. A. N. Bruin, M. E. Barber, S. D. Edkins, K. Nishimura, S. Yonezawa, Y . Maeno, and A. P. Mackenzie: Science344(2014) 283

    2014

  43. [43]

    Y .-S. Li, M. Garst, J. Schmalian, S. Ghosh, N. Kikugawa, D. A. Sokolov, C. W. Hicks, F. Jerzembeck, M. S. Ikeda, Z. Hu, B. J. Ramshaw, A. W. Rost, M. Nicklas, and A. P. Mackenzie: Nature607 (2022) 276

    2022

  44. [44]

    Mattoni, T

    G. Mattoni, T. Johnson, A. Ikeda, S. Paul, J. Bobowski, M. Sigrist, and Y . Maeno: Nat. Commun.17(2025) 700

    2025

  45. [45]

    Bardeen, L

    J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer: Phys. Rev.108(1957) 1175

    1957

  46. [46]

    Tinkham:Introduction to Superconductivity: Second Edition(Dover Books on Physics

    M. Tinkham:Introduction to Superconductivity: Second Edition(Dover Books on Physics. Dover Publications, 2004), Dover Books on Physics

    2004

  47. [47]

    E. S. Bliss and J. A. Rayne: Phys. Rev.177(1969) 673

    1969

  48. [48]

    Phillips: Proc

    W. Phillips: Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A309(1969) 259

    1969

  49. [49]

    D. J. Bishop, C. M. Varma, B. Batlogg, E. Bucher, Z. Fisk, and J. L. Smith: Phys. Rev. Lett.53(1984) 1009

    1984

  50. [50]

    Batlogg, D

    B. Batlogg, D. Bishop, B. Golding, C. M. Varma, Z. Fisk, J. L. Smith, and H. R. Ott: Phys. Rev. Lett.55(1985) 1319

    1985

  51. [51]

    D. J. Bishop, P. L. Gammel, A. P. Ramirez, R. J. Cava, B. Batlogg, and E. A. Rietman: Phys. Rev. B35(1987) 8788

    1987

  52. [52]

    Kurihara, K

    R. Kurihara, K. Mitsumoto, M. Akatsu, Y . Nemoto, T. Goto, Y . Kobayashi, and M. Sato: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.86(2017) 064706

    2017

  53. [53]

    H. Sato, M. Akatsu, R. Kurihara, Y . Kobayashi, and Y . Nemoto: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.92(2023) 124710

    2023

  54. [54]

    Walz and F

    L. Walz and F. Lichtenberg: Acta. Crystallogr. Sect. C49(1993) 1268

    1993

  55. [55]

    Details of the ultrasonic measurements and de- velopment of simultaneous measurements of AC magnetic susceptibil- ity and elasticity

    Supplemental Material. Details of the ultrasonic measurements and de- velopment of simultaneous measurements of AC magnetic susceptibil- ity and elasticity

  56. [56]

    Akima, S

    T. Akima, S. NishiZaki, and Y . Maeno: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.68(1999) 694

    1999

  57. [57]

    Nishimori and G

    H. Nishimori and G. Ortiz:Elements of Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena(Oxford Graduate Texts. Oxford University Press, 2011), Oxford Graduate Texts

    2011

  58. [58]

    T. Inui, Y . Tanabe, and Y . Onodera:Group Theory and Its Applications in Physics(Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012), Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences

    2012

  59. [59]

    Tsuchiizu, Y

    M. Tsuchiizu, Y . Yamakawa, S. Onari, Y . Ohno, and H. Kontani: Phys. Rev. B91(2015) 155103

    2015

  60. [60]

    Kusunose and H

    H. Kusunose and H. Harima: J Phys. Soc. Jpn.80(2011) 084702. 6

    2011