Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Systematic investigation of the fallback accretion powered model for hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.00090 v2 pith:ASCNQFT3 submitted 2018-05-31 astro-ph.HE

Systematic investigation of the fallback accretion powered model for hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords accretionfallbacksuperluminoussupernovaemodelenginehydrogen-poorlight
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The energy liberated by fallback accretion has been suggested as a possible engine to power hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae. We systematically investigate this model using the Bayesian light-curve fitting code MOSFiT (Modular Open Source Fitter for Transients), fitting the light curves of 37 hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae assuming a fallback accretion central engine. We find that this model can yield good fits to their light curves, with a fit quality that rivals the popular magnetar engine models. Examining our derived parameters for the fallback model, we find the total energy requirements from the accretion disk are estimated to be 0.002 - 0.7 Msun c^2. If we adopt a typical conversion efficiency ~ 1e-3, the required mass to accrete is thus 2 - 700 Msun. Many superluminous supernovae, therefore, require an unrealistic accretion mass, and so only a fraction of these events could be powered by fallback accretion unless the true efficiency is much greater than our fiducial value. The superluminous supernovae that require the smallest amounts of fallback mass still remain to be the fallback accretion powered supernova candidates, but they are difficult to be distinguished solely by their light curve properties.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.