Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The soft X-ray emission of Ark 120. XMM-Newton, NuSTAR, and the importance of taking the broad view

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1401.5235 v1 pith:7KNFE43C submitted 2014-01-21 astro-ph.HE

The soft X-ray emission of Ark 120. XMM-Newton, NuSTAR, and the importance of taking the broad view

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords nustarx-rayemissionmodelssoftcomptonizationcutoffmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present simultaneous XMM-Newton and NuSTAR observations of the `bare' Seyfert 1 galaxy, Ark 120, a system in which ionized absorption is absent. The NuSTAR hard X-ray spectral coverage allows us to constrain different models for the excess soft X-ray emission. Among phenomenological models, a cutoff power law best explains the soft X-ray emission. This model likely corresponds to Comptonization of the accretion disk seed UV photons by a population of warm electrons: using Comptonization models, a temperature of ~0.3 keV and an optical depth of ~13 are found. If the UV-to-X-ray optxagnf model is applied, the UV fluxes from the XMM-$Newton$ Optical Monitor suggest an intermediate black hole spin. Contrary to several other sources observed by NuSTAR, no high energy cutoff is detected, with a lower limit of 190 keV.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.