REVIEW 1 cited by
A Study and Comparison of Human and Deep Learning Recognition Performance Under Visual Distortions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Study and Comparison of Human and Deep Learning Recognition Performance Under Visual Distortions
read the original abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) achieve excellent performance on standard classification tasks. However, under image quality distortions such as blur and noise, classification accuracy becomes poor. In this work, we compare the performance of DNNs with human subjects on distorted images. We show that, although DNNs perform better than or on par with humans on good quality images, DNN performance is still much lower than human performance on distorted images. We additionally find that there is little correlation in errors between DNNs and human subjects. This could be an indication that the internal representation of images are different between DNNs and the human visual system. These comparisons with human performance could be used to guide future development of more robust DNNs.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Quantization Robustness to Input Degradations for Object Detection
Benchmarks of YOLO models from nano to extra-large show that degradation-aware calibration for Static INT8 PTQ yields no broad robustness gains to input degradations over clean-data calibration, with limited exception...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.