Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Bayesian surface photometry analysis for early-type galaxies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1711.02188 v1 pith:5X5SWAEA submitted 2017-11-06 astro-ph.GA

Bayesian surface photometry analysis for early-type galaxies

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords mathrmsamplegalfitgalphatsdssanalysisbayesianbimodal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We explore the application of Bayesian image analysis to infer the properties of an SDSS early-type galaxy sample including AGN. We use GALPHAT (Yoon et al. 2010) with a Bayes-factor model comparison to photometrically infer an AGN population and verify this using spectroscopic signatures. Our combined posterior sample for the SDSS sample reveals distinct low and high concentration modes after the point-source flux is modeled. This suggests that ETG parameters are intrinsically bimodal. The bimodal signature was weak when analyzed by GALFIT (Peng et al. 2002, 2010). This led us to create several ensembles of synthetic images to investigate the bias of inferred structural parameters and compare with GALFIT. GALPHAT inferences are less biased, especially for high-concentration profiles: GALPHAT S\'ersic index $n$, $r_{e}$ and MAG deviate from the true values by $6\%$, $7.6\%$ and $-0.03 \,\mathrm{mag}$, respectively, while GALFIT deviates by $15\%$, $22\%$ and $-0.09$\, mag, respectively. In addition, we explore the reliability for the photometric detection of AGN using Bayes factors. For our SDSS sample with $r_{e}\ge 7.92\,$arcsec, we correctly identify central point sources with $\mathrm{Mag_{PS}}-\mathrm{Mag_{Sersic}}\le 5$ for $n\le6$ and $\mathrm{Mag_{PS}}-\mathrm{Mag_{Sersic}}\le 3$ for $n>6$. The magnitude range increases and classification error decreases with increasing resolution, suggesting that this approach will excel for upcoming high-resolution surveys. Future work will extend this to models that test hypotheses of galaxy evolution through the cosmic time.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.