Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Chain Of Thought Compression: A Theoretical Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2601.21576 v2 pith:5RYIS7D4 submitted 2026-01-29 cs.AI

Chain Of Thought Compression: A Theoretical Analysis

classification cs.AI
keywords reasoningintermediatestepscompressiontheoreticalalicotanalysisempirically
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has unlocked advanced reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) with intermediate steps, yet incurs prohibitive computational costs due to generation of extra tokens. Recent studies empirically show that compressing reasoning steps into latent states, or implicit CoT compression, offers a token-efficient alternative. However, the mechanism behind CoT compression remains unclear. In this paper, we provide the first theoretical analysis of the difficulty of learning to internalize intermediate reasoning steps. By introducing Order-r Interaction, we prove that the learning signal for high-order logical dependencies exponentially decays to solve irreducible problem, where skipping intermediate steps inevitably leads to high-order interaction barriers. To empirically validate this, we introduce NatBool-DAG, a challenging benchmark designed to enforce irreducible logical reasoning and eliminate semantic shortcuts. Guided by our theoretical findings, we propose ALiCoT (Aligned Implicit CoT), a novel framework that overcomes the signal decay by aligning latent token distributions with intermediate reasoning states. Experimental results demonstrate that ALiCoT successfully unlocks efficient reasoning: it achieves a 54.4x speedup while maintaining performance comparable to explicit CoT.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bridging the Gap Between Latent and Explicit Reasoning with Looped Transformers

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LOTUS uses a looped padded Transformer with parallel cross-entropy supervision on gold CoT tokens to match explicit CoT performance at 3B parameters while reducing thought-phase latency 2.5x-6.9x.

  2. Thinking Past the Answer: Evaluating Harmful Overthinking in Large Reasoning Models

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Stopping large reasoning models at the first correct reasoning prefix improves accuracy up to 21% by avoiding harmful overthinking that destabilizes correct trajectories.

  3. Xetrieval: Mechanistically Explaining Dense Retrieval

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Xetrieval enriches sentence embeddings with a single-pass reasoning internalizer and decomposes the result into sparse interpretable features whose overlaps explain individual dense-retrieval decisions.