REVIEW
An Informative Tracking Benchmark
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
An Informative Tracking Benchmark
read the original abstract
Along with the rapid progress of visual tracking, existing benchmarks become less informative due to redundancy of samples and weak discrimination between current trackers, making evaluations on all datasets extremely time-consuming. Thus, a small and informative benchmark, which covers all typical challenging scenarios to facilitate assessing the tracker performance, is of great interest. In this work, we develop a principled way to construct a small and informative tracking benchmark (ITB) with 7% out of 1.2 M frames of existing and newly collected datasets, which enables efficient evaluation while ensuring effectiveness. Specifically, we first design a quality assessment mechanism to select the most informative sequences from existing benchmarks taking into account 1) challenging level, 2) discriminative strength, 3) and density of appearance variations. Furthermore, we collect additional sequences to ensure the diversity and balance of tracking scenarios, leading to a total of 20 sequences for each scenario. By analyzing the results of 15 state-of-the-art trackers re-trained on the same data, we determine the effective methods for robust tracking under each scenario and demonstrate new challenges for future research direction in this field.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.