pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.02382 · v1 · pith:FZGKKS3Cnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · ✦ hep-ph

Symmetry Analysis of Compact Tetraquark States and Implications for the Level Ordering of the Fully Charmed Candidates X(6600), X(6900), and X(7100)

Shuai Yin , Ti Gong , Jingya Zhu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 09:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords tetraquarkssymmetry analysispermutation groupfully charmedJ^P distributionchromomagnetic interactionexotic hadronslevel ordering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Symmetry constraints make compact tetraquarks favor J^P=2+ at low energy, placing the X(6600), X(6900), and X(7100) among lower spectrum levels.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper maps allowed total angular momentum and parity values for compact tetraquarks by restricting S4 representations to S2 x S2 for tetrahedral or square arrangements of two quarks and two antiquarks. This yields the nodal structure for orbital angular momentum up to L=3 and shows that low-energy states concentrate at J^P=2+. A reader would care because the resulting distribution matches the three-flavor four-quark case, stays fixed when chromomagnetic forces are added, and therefore points to symmetry rather than force details as the main organizer of the low-lying spectrum, with direct consequences for where the observed fully charmed candidates sit.

Core claim

The analysis derives the accessible J^P states for the qq qbar qbar system from the nodal structure of the qqqq system via restricted S4 representations onto S2 x S2. It finds that low-energy compact tetraquark states favor J^P=2+. The J^P distribution closely resembles that obtained for the three-flavor four-quark system, and the location of the distribution peak remains unchanged when chromomagnetic interaction effects are incorporated. These results indicate that the dominant features of the low-lying spectrum are governed primarily by symmetry constraints. Consequently the fully charmed tetraquark candidates X(6600), X(6900), and X(7100) may occupy relatively low-lying levels, with mecha

What carries the argument

The restricted representations of the permutation group S4 onto S2 x S2, which extract the inherent nodal structure and allowed J^P states of the qq qbar qbar system from the qqqq system for L less than or equal to 3.

If this is right

  • Low-energy compact tetraquark states are likely to favor J^P=2+.
  • The symmetry-induced J^P distribution closely resembles that for the three-flavor four-quark system.
  • The location of the distribution peak remains unchanged when chromomagnetic interaction effects are incorporated.
  • The fully charmed tetraquark candidates X(6600), X(6900), and X(7100) may occupy relatively low-lying levels of the fully charmed tetraquark spectrum.
  • Mechanisms beyond CMI dynamics are likely involved, potentially mitigating or competing with the effects of CMI in compact fully charmed tetraquark states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If symmetry dominates the low-lying spectrum, the same 2+ preference should appear in other flavor combinations of compact tetraquarks.
  • Lattice QCD wave-function studies could directly check whether the nodal structures predicted by the S4 restriction appear in the ground states.
  • The robustness against CMI suggests that searches for additional fully charmed states should prioritize J^P=2+ candidates near the observed masses.

Load-bearing premise

Two quarks and two antiquarks are arranged in either a tetrahedral or a square configuration.

What would settle it

Discovery of a low-energy compact tetraquark with J^P other than 2+ that fits the spatial configurations, or clear evidence that the X(6600), X(6900), or X(7100) are high-lying excitations rather than low-lying states, would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.02382 by Jingya Zhu, Shuai Yin, Ti Gong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The positions of LQCD, phenomenology, and symmetr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Construction of the body-fixed coordinate systems [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: J P distribution of the number of accessible states for (a) compact tetraquark states Na and (b) three-flavor four-quark systems N′ a , when the configuration space is restricted to the set {ETH, Sqr} or the set {ETH3, Sqr3}. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: J P distribution of the weighted normalized number of accessible states ρa for compact tetraquark states, for given values of the parameter θ, when the configuration space is restricted to (a) the set {ETH, Sqr} and (b) the set {ETH3, Sqr3}. several J P C cases, specifically 0 −+, 0 −−, 1 −+, 1 +−, 1 −−, and 2 ++, and it was found that the mass distributions of the fully charmed compact tetraquark states w… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Variation of the weighted normalized number of acc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Motivated by recent experimental observations, we investigate the $J^P$ distribution of low-energy compact tetraquark states. Assuming that two quarks and two antiquarks are arranged in either a tetrahedral or a square configuration, we employ the restricted representations of the permutation group $S_4$ onto $S_2 \times S_2$ to derive the inherent nodal structure of the $qq\bar q\bar q$ system from that of the $qqqq$ system for orbital angular momentum $L \leq 3$. Based on this framework, we determine the distribution of accessible $J^P$ states and find that low-energy compact tetraquark states are likely to favor $J^P=2^+$. Our analysis yields two observations that further support the dynamical robustness of symmetry-based classifications in exotic hadron spectroscopy. First, the symmetry-induced $J^P$ distribution of compact tetraquark states closely resembles that obtained for the three-flavor four-quark system. Second, the location of the distribution peak remains unchanged when chromomagnetic interaction (CMI) effects are incorporated. Together, these results suggest that the dominant features of the low-lying spectrum are governed primarily by symmetry constraints rather than by the details of the underlying dynamics. These findings further imply that the fully charmed tetraquark candidates $X(6600)$, $X(6900)$, and $X(7100)$ may occupy relatively low-lying levels of the fully charmed tetraquark spectrum. They also indicate that mechanisms beyond CMI dynamics are likely involved, potentially mitigating or competing with the effects of CMI in compact fully charmed tetraquark states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that assuming tetrahedral or square geometries for the qqar qar q system, the restricted S_4 representations onto S_2×S_2 yield a nodal structure for L≤3 that favors J^P=2+ for low-energy compact tetraquarks. It reports that this distribution resembles the three-flavor four-quark case and that the peak location is unchanged by CMI, implying the X(6600), X(6900), X(7100) candidates are relatively low-lying and that mechanisms beyond CMI are involved.

Significance. If the geometric assumption holds, the work would support the dynamical robustness of symmetry-based classifications in exotic spectroscopy by demonstrating stability under CMI and similarity to the three-flavor system. The standard group-theoretic construction using permutation representations is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (first paragraph): the central claim that low-energy states favor J^P=2+ is derived from the S_4→S_2×S_2 restriction under the assumption of tetrahedral or square configurations; no variational, potential-model, or energy-comparison argument is supplied to establish why these geometries are preferred over alternatives such as diquark-antidiquark clustering or linear arrangements, which would alter the allowed J^P set and peak location.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the observation that 'the location of the distribution peak remains unchanged when chromomagnetic interaction (CMI) effects are incorporated' is stated without reference to explicit tables, wave-function overlaps, or numerical verification in the provided text, leaving the robustness claim unconfirmed from the given material.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment below, clarifying the scope of our symmetry analysis while agreeing to improve explicitness where needed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (first paragraph): the central claim that low-energy states favor J^P=2+ is derived from the S_4→S_2×S_2 restriction under the assumption of tetrahedral or square configurations; no variational, potential-model, or energy-comparison argument is supplied to establish why these geometries are preferred over alternatives such as diquark-antidiquark clustering or linear arrangements, which would alter the allowed J^P set and peak location.

    Authors: Our work is a symmetry analysis that derives the allowed J^P nodal structure specifically under the assumption of compact tetrahedral or square geometries for the qqar qar q system. These geometries are standard choices in the literature for exploring permutation symmetries in compact multiquark states, as they allow direct restriction of S_4 representations. We do not perform variational or potential-model calculations to compare energies against diquark or linear configurations, as such dynamical studies lie outside the scope of this paper. The central claim is explicitly conditional on the assumed geometries, which we will emphasize more clearly. In revision we will add a short paragraph in the introduction citing prior work on compact symmetric arrangements to motivate the choice. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the observation that 'the location of the distribution peak remains unchanged when chromomagnetic interaction (CMI) effects are incorporated' is stated without reference to explicit tables, wave-function overlaps, or numerical verification in the provided text, leaving the robustness claim unconfirmed from the given material.

    Authors: The full manuscript contains a dedicated section (with accompanying figures) that computes and compares the J^P distributions both with and without the CMI term, confirming that the peak location at J^P=2+ is unchanged. We apologize that the abstract did not point to these results. In the revised version we will insert explicit references to the relevant section, figures, and tables both in the abstract and at the corresponding point in the main text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation applies external group theory to stated geometric assumptions without self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The paper states its central assumption (tetrahedral or square configurations) explicitly in the abstract and proceeds by restricting S4 representations onto S2×S2 to obtain nodal structure for L≤3 from the qqqq system. This yields a J^P distribution whose peak at 2+ is a direct consequence of the group-theoretic counting under the given geometries, not a fit or self-definition. The two robustness observations are comparisons (to three-flavor case and to CMI inclusion) rather than load-bearing derivations. No self-citations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or ansätze smuggled via prior work appear in the provided text. The result is therefore self-contained against external symmetry benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on two domain assumptions about geometry and on standard representation theory of the symmetric group; no free parameters or new entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Two quarks and two antiquarks are arranged in either a tetrahedral or a square configuration
    Invoked in the first sentence of the abstract to derive the nodal structure from the qqqq system.
  • standard math The restricted representations of S4 onto S2 x S2 correctly capture the inherent nodal structure for L <= 3
    Core technical step used to obtain the J^P distribution.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5846 in / 1501 out tokens · 22776 ms · 2026-07-03T09:39:44.263128+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

190 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Takahashi et al

    F. Takahashi et al. Review of Particle Physics. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A , 41:2630011, 2026

    2026

  2. [2]

    Light meson spectro scopy

    Stephen Godfrey and Jim Napolitano. Light meson spectro scopy. Rev. Mod. Phys., 71:1411–1462, 1999

    1999

  3. [3]

    Anthony J. G. Hey and Robert L. Kelly. BARYON SPECTROSCOP Y. Phys. Rept., 96:71, 1983

    1983

  4. [4]

    Simon Capstick and W . Roberts. Quark models of baryon mas ses and decays. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 45:S241– S331, 2000

    2000

  5. [5]

    Baryon spectros copy

    Eberhard Klempt and Jean-Marc Richard. Baryon spectros copy. Rev. Mod. Phys., 82:1095–1153, 2010

    2010

  6. [6]

    Crede and W

    V . Crede and W . Roberts. Progress towards understanding baryon resonances. Rept. Prog. Phys., 76:076301, 2013

    2013

  7. [7]

    S. K. Choi et al. Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusiveB± → K ±π +π −J/ψ decays. Phys. Rev. Lett., 91:262001, 2003

    2003

  8. [8]

    S. K. Choi et al. Observation of a resonance-like structu re in theπ ± ψ ′ mass distribution in exclusiveB → Kπ ±ψ ′ decays. Phys. Rev. Lett., 100:142001, 2008

    2008

  9. [9]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlik e Structure ine+e− → π +π − J/ψ at √ s = 4. 26 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110:252001, 2013

    2013

  10. [10]

    Z. Q. Liu et al. Study of e+e− → π +π −J/ψ and Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike State at Belle. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110:252002, 2013. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 111, 019901 ( 2013)]

    2013

  11. [11]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. Observation of Zc(3900)0 ine+e− → π 0π 0J/ψ . Phys. Rev. Lett., 115(11):112003, 2015. 19

    2015

  12. [12]

    Observation of the resonant character o f the Z(4430)− state

    Roel Aaij et al. Observation of the resonant character o f the Z(4430)− state. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 112(22):222002, 2014

    2014

  13. [13]

    Adlarson et al

    P . Adlarson et al. Neutron-proton scattering in the con text of thed∗ (2380) resonance. Phys. Rev. C, 90(3):035204, 2014

    2014

  14. [14]

    Observation of J/ψp Resonances Consistent with Pentaquark States in Λ 0 b → J/ψK −p Decays

    Roel Aaij et al. Observation of J/ψp Resonances Consistent with Pentaquark States in Λ 0 b → J/ψK −p Decays. Phys. Rev. Lett., 115:072001, 2015

    2015

  15. [15]

    Evidence of a J/ψ Λ structure and observation of excited Ξ − states in the Ξ − b → J/ψ ΛK − decay

    Roel Aaij et al. Evidence of a J/ψ Λ structure and observation of excited Ξ − states in the Ξ − b → J/ψ ΛK − decay. Sci. Bull., 66:1278–1287, 2021

    2021

  16. [16]

    Observation of a Near-Threshold S tructure in the K + Recoil-Mass Spectra in e+e− → K +(D− s D∗0 +D∗− s D0)

    Medina Ablikim et al. Observation of a Near-Threshold S tructure in the K + Recoil-Mass Spectra in e+e− → K +(D− s D∗0 +D∗− s D0). Phys. Rev. Lett., 126(10):102001, 2021

    2021

  17. [17]

    Observation of structure in the J/ψ -pair mass spectrum

    Roel Aaij et al. Observation of structure in the J/ψ -pair mass spectrum. Sci. Bull., 65(23):1983–1993, 2020

    1983

  18. [18]

    Observation of an exotic narrow doubly c harmed tetraquark

    Roel Aaij et al. Observation of an exotic narrow doubly c harmed tetraquark. Nature Phys., 18(7):751–754, 2022

    2022

  19. [19]

    Claude Amsler and N. A. Tornqvist. Mesons beyond the nai ve quark model. Phys. Rept., 389:61–117, 2004

    2004

  20. [20]

    Pentaquarks

    Shi-Lin Zhu. Pentaquarks. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A , 19:3439–3469, 2004

    2004

  21. [21]

    R. L. Jaffe. Exotica. Phys. Rept., 409:1–45, 2005

    2005

  22. [22]

    Eric S. Swanson. The New heavy mesons: A Status report. Phys. Rept., 429:243–305, 2006

    2006

  23. [23]

    New hadron states

    Shi-Lin Zhu. New hadron states. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E , 17:283–322, 2008

    2008

  24. [24]

    Stephen Godfrey and Stephen L. Olsen. The Exotic XYZ Cha rmonium-like Mesons. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. , 58:51–73, 2008

    2008

  25. [25]

    Drenska, R

    N. Drenska, R. Faccini, F. Piccinini, A. Polosa, F. Reng a, and C. Sabelli. New Hadronic Spectroscopy. Riv. Nuovo Cim., 33(11):633–712, 2010

    2010

  26. [26]

    Guerrieri, Fulvio Piccinin i, Alessandro Pilloni, and Antonio D

    Angelo Esposito, Andrea L. Guerrieri, Fulvio Piccinin i, Alessandro Pilloni, and Antonio D. Polosa. Four-Quark Hadrons: an Updated Review. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A , 30:1530002, 2015

    2015

  27. [27]

    The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states

    Hua-Xing Chen, Wei Chen, Xiang Liu, and Shi-Lin Zhu. The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states. Phys. Rept., 639:1–121, 2016

    2016

  28. [28]

    Exotic hadrons: review and perspec tives

    Jean-Marc Richard. Exotic hadrons: review and perspec tives. Few Body Syst., 57(12):1185–1212, 2016

    2016

  29. [29]

    Lebed, Ryan E

    Richard F. Lebed, Ryan E. Mitchell, and Eric S. Swanson. Heavy-Quark QCD Exotica. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. , 93:143–194, 2017

    2017

  30. [30]

    Exotic s: Heavy Pentaquarks and Tetraquarks

    Ahmed Ali, Jens S¨ oren Lange, and Sheldon Stone. Exotic s: Heavy Pentaquarks and Tetraquarks. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 97:123–198, 2017

    2017

  31. [31]

    Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: Experi- mental evidence

    Stephen Lars Olsen, Tomasz Skwarnicki, and Daria Ziemi nska. Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: Experi- mental evidence. Rev. Mod. Phys., 90(1):015003, 2018

    2018

  32. [32]

    Rosner, and Tomasz Skwarni cki

    Marek Karliner, Jonathan L. Rosner, and Tomasz Skwarni cki. Multiquark States. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. , 68:17–44, 2018. 20

    2018

  33. [33]

    Pentaquark and Tetraquark states

    Y an-Rui Liu, Hua-Xing Chen, Wei Chen, Xiang Liu, and Shi -Lin Zhu. Pentaquark and Tetraquark states. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 107:237–320, 2019

    2019

  34. [34]

    Thomas, Antonio V airo, and Chang-Zheng Y uan

    Nora Brambilla, Simon Eidelman, Christoph Hanhart, Al exey Nefediev, Cheng-Ping Shen, Christopher E. Thomas, Antonio V airo, and Chang-Zheng Y uan. The XYZ states: experimental and theoretical status and perspecti ves. Phys. Rept., 873:1–154, 2020

    2020

  35. [35]

    Thresh old cusps and triangle singularities in hadronic reactions

    Feng-Kun Guo, Xiao-Hai Liu, and Shuntaro Sakai. Thresh old cusps and triangle singularities in hadronic reactions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 112:103757, 2020

    2020

  36. [36]

    M. Y u. Barabanov et al. Diquark correlations in hadron p hysics: Origin, impact and evidence. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 116:103835, 2021

    2021

  37. [37]

    An updated review of the new hadron states

    Hua-Xing Chen, Wei Chen, Xiang Liu, Y an-Rui Liu, and Shi -Lin Zhu. An updated review of the new hadron states. Rept. Prog. Phys., 86(2):026201, 2023

    2023

  38. [38]

    Meißner, and Carsten Urbach

    Maxim Mai, Ulf-G. Meißner, and Carsten Urbach. Towards a theory of hadron resonances. Phys. Rept., 1001:1–66, 2023

    2023

  39. [39]

    A Schematic Model of Baryons and Meso ns

    Murray Gell-Mann. A Schematic Model of Baryons and Meso ns. Phys. Lett., 8:214–215, 1964

    1964

  40. [40]

    G. Zweig. An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetr y and its breaking. V ersion 1. 1964

    1964

  41. [41]

    New Structures in the J/ψJ/ψ Mass Spectrum in Proton-Proton Collisions at √ s = 13 TeV

    Aram Hayrapetyan et al. New Structures in the J/ψJ/ψ Mass Spectrum in Proton-Proton Collisions at √ s = 13 TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett., 132(11):111901, 2024

    2024

  42. [42]

    Four-Charm-Quark Matter from the CMS Collab oration as a Witness of the Development of High- Precision Hadron Spectroscopy

    Xiang Liu. Four-Charm-Quark Matter from the CMS Collab oration as a Witness of the Development of High- Precision Hadron Spectroscopy. Sci. Bull., 69:2802–2803, 2024

    2024

  43. [43]

    Experimental Road to a Charming Family of Tetraquarks

    Feng Zhu, Gerry Bauer, and Kai Yi. Experimental Road to a Charming Family of Tetraquarks . . . and Beyond. Chin. Phys. Lett., 41(11):111201, 2024

    2024

  44. [44]

    Observation of an Excess of Dicharmon ium Events in the Four-Muon Final State with the A TLAS Detector.Phys

    Georges Aad et al. Observation of an Excess of Dicharmon ium Events in the Four-Muon Final State with the A TLAS Detector.Phys. Rev. Lett., 131(15):151902, 2023

    2023

  45. [45]

    Determination of the spin and pa rity of all-charm tetraquarks

    Aram Hayrapetyan et al. Determination of the spin and pa rity of all-charm tetraquarks. Nature, 648(8092):58–63, 2025

    2025

  46. [46]

    A Possible Model for New Resonances-Ex otics and Hidden Charm

    Y oichi Iwasaki. A Possible Model for New Resonances-Ex otics and Hidden Charm. Prog. Theor . Phys., 54:492, 1975

    1975

  47. [47]

    Y . Iwasaki. Is a State c anti-c c anti-c Found at 6.0-GeV? Phys. Rev. Lett., 36:1266, 1976

    1976

  48. [48]

    The (cc) - ( ¯cc) (Diquark - Anti-Diquark) States in e+e− Annihilation

    Kuang-Ta Chao. The (cc) - ( ¯cc) (Diquark - Anti-Diquark) States in e+e− Annihilation. Z. Phys. C, 7:317, 1981

    1981

  49. [49]

    J. P . Ader, J. M. Richard, and P . Taxil. DO NARROW HEA VY MULTI - QUARK STA TES EXIST?Phys. Rev. D, 25:2370, 1982

    1982

  50. [50]

    Heller and J

    L. Heller and J. A. Tjon. On Bound States of Heavy Q2 ¯Q2 Systems. Phys. Rev. D, 32:755, 1985

    1985

  51. [51]

    A. M. Badalian, B. L. Ioffe, and Andrei V . Smilga. FOUR QU ARK STA TES IN THE HEA VY QUARK SYSTEM. Nucl. Phys. B , 281:85, 1987

    1987

  52. [52]

    Lloyd and James P

    Richard J. Lloyd and James P . V ary. All charm tetraquark s. Phys. Rev. D, 70:014009, 2004. 21

    2004

  53. [53]

    A. V . Berezhnoy, A. K. Likhoded, A. V . Luchinsky, and A. A . Novoselov. Double J/psi-meson Production at LHC and 4c-tetraquark state. Phys. Rev. D, 84:094023, 2011

    2011

  54. [54]

    A. V . Berezhnoy, A. V . Luchinsky, and A. A. Novoselov. Te traquarks Composed of 4 Heavy Quarks. Phys. Rev. D, 86:034004, 2012

    2012

  55. [55]

    Fisch er

    Walter Heupel, Gernot Eichmann, and Christian S. Fisch er. Tetraquark Bound States in a Bethe-Salpeter Approach. Phys. Lett. B, 718:545–549, 2012

    2012

  56. [56]

    Heavy-flavored tetraquark states with the QQ ¯Q ¯Q configuration

    Jing Wu, Y an-Rui Liu, Kan Chen, Xiang Liu, and Shi-Lin Zh u. Heavy-flavored tetraquark states with the QQ ¯Q ¯Q configuration. Phys. Rev. D, 97(9):094015, 2018

    2018

  57. [57]

    Wei Chen, Hua-Xing Chen, Xiang Liu, T. G. Steele, and Shi -Lin Zhu. Hunting for exotic doubly hidden- charm/bottom tetraquark states. Phys. Lett. B, 773:247–251, 2017

    2017

  58. [58]

    Rosne r.QQ ¯Q ¯Q states: masses, production, and decays

    Marek Karliner, Shmuel Nussinov, and Jonathan L. Rosne r.QQ ¯Q ¯Q states: masses, production, and decays. Phys. Rev. D, 95(3):034011, 2017

    2017

  59. [59]

    Analysis of the QQ ¯Q ¯Q tetraquark states with QCD sum rules

    Zhi-Gang Wang. Analysis of the QQ ¯Q ¯Q tetraquark states with QCD sum rules. Eur . Phys. J. C, 77(7):432, 2017

    2017

  60. [60]

    V . R. Debastiani and F. S. Navarra. A non-relativistic model for the [cc][¯c¯c] tetraquark. Chin. Phys. C, 43(1):013105, 2019

    2019

  61. [61]

    Analysis of the vector and axialvectorQQ ¯Q ¯Q tetraquark states with QCD sum rules

    Zhi-Gang Wang and Zun-Y an Di. Analysis of the vector and axialvectorQQ ¯Q ¯Q tetraquark states with QCD sum rules. Acta Phys. Polon. B, 50:1335, 2019

    2019

  62. [62]

    All-heavy tetraquarks

    Ming-Sheng Liu, Qi-Fang L¨ u, Xian-Hui Zhong, and Qiang Zhao. All-heavy tetraquarks. Phys. Rev. D , 100(1):016006, 2019

    2019

  63. [63]

    Spectrum of t he fully-heavy tetraquark state QQ ¯Q′ ¯Q′

    Guang-Juan Wang, Lu Meng, and Shi-Lin Zhu. Spectrum of t he fully-heavy tetraquark state QQ ¯Q′ ¯Q′. Phys. Rev. D, 100(9):096013, 2019

    2019

  64. [64]

    M. A. Bedolla, J. Ferretti, C. D. Roberts, and E. Santopi nto. Spectrum of fully-heavy tetraquarks from a di- quark+antidiquark perspective. Eur . Phys. J. C, 80(11):1004, 2020

    2020

  65. [65]

    Fully heavy tetraquark states and their evi- dences in LHC observations

    Ming-Sheng liu, Feng-Xiao Liu, Xian-Hui Zhong, and Qia ng Zhao. Fully heavy tetraquark states and their evi- dences in LHC observations. Phys. Rev. D, 109(7):076017, 2024

    2024

  66. [66]

    Tetraquark candidates in the LHCb’s di- J/ψ mass spectrum

    Zhi-Gang Wang. Tetraquark candidates in the LHCb’s di- J/ψ mass spectrum. Chin. Phys. C , 44(11):113106, 2020

    2020

  67. [67]

    Ful l-heavy tetraquarks in constituent quark models

    Xin Jin, Y aoyao Xue, Hongxia Huang, and Jialun Ping. Ful l-heavy tetraquarks in constituent quark models. Eur . Phys. J. C, 80(11):1083, 2020

    2020

  68. [68]

    Becchi, J

    C. Becchi, J. Ferretti, A. Giachino, L. Maiani, and E. Sa ntopinto. A study of cc¯c¯c tetraquark decays in 4 muons and inD(∗) ¯D(∗) at LHC. Phys. Lett. B , 811:135952, 2020

    2020

  69. [69]

    Masses o f fully heavy tetraquarks QQ ¯Q ¯Q in an extended relativized quark model

    Qi-Fang L¨ u, Dian-Y ong Chen, and Y u-Bing Dong. Masses o f fully heavy tetraquarks QQ ¯Q ¯Q in an extended relativized quark model. Eur . Phys. J. C, 80(9):871, 2020

    2020

  70. [70]

    Str ong decays of fully-charm tetraquarks into di- charmonia

    Hua-Xing Chen, Wei Chen, Xiang Liu, and Shi-Lin Zhu. Str ong decays of fully-charm tetraquarks into di- charmonia. Sci. Bull., 65:1994–2000, 2020

    1994

  71. [71]

    Discovery potential for the LHCb fully-charm tetraquark X(6900) state via ¯pp annihilation reaction

    Xiao-Y un Wang, Qing-Y ong Lin, Hao Xu, Y a-Ping Xie, Yin Huang, and Xurong Chen. Discovery potential for the LHCb fully-charm tetraquark X(6900) state via ¯pp annihilation reaction. Phys. Rev. D, 102:116014, 2020. 22

    2020

  72. [72]

    R. M. Albuquerque, S. Narison, A. Rabemananjara, D. Rab etiarivony, and G. Randriamanatrika. Doubly-hidden scalar heavy molecules and tetraquarks states from QCD at NL O. Phys. Rev. D, 102(9):094001, 2020

    2020

  73. [73]

    Giron and Richard F

    Jesse F. Giron and Richard F. Lebed. Simple spectrum of c¯cc¯c states in the dynamical diquark model. Phys. Rev. D, 102(7):074003, 2020

    2020

  74. [74]

    J/ψ -pair resonance by LHCb: a new revolution? Sci

    Luciano Maiani. J/ψ -pair resonance by LHCb: a new revolution? Sci. Bull., 65:1949–1951, 2020

    1949

  75. [75]

    About the J/ψ J/ψ peak of LHCb: fully-charmed tetraquark? Sci

    Jean-Marc Richard. About the J/ψ J/ψ peak of LHCb: fully-charmed tetraquark? Sci. Bull. , 65:1954–1955, 2020

    1954

  76. [76]

    Producing fully charm structures in the J/ψ -pair invariant mass spectrum

    Jun-Zhang Wang, Dian-Y ong Chen, Xiang Liu, and Takayuk i Matsuki. Producing fully charm structures in the J/ψ -pair invariant mass spectrum. Phys. Rev. D, 103(7):071503, 2021

    2021

  77. [77]

    The possible tetraquark statescc¯c¯c observed by the LHCb experiment

    Kuang-Ta Chao and Shi-Lin Zhu. The possible tetraquark statescc¯c¯c observed by the LHCb experiment. Sci. Bull., 65(23):1952–1953, 2020

    1952

  78. [78]

    On the mechanism of T4c(6900) tetraquark production

    Rafał Maciuła, Wolfgang Sch¨ afer, and Antoni Szczurek . On the mechanism of T4c(6900) tetraquark production. Phys. Lett. B, 812:136010, 2021

    2021

  79. [79]

    Marek Karliner and Jonathan L. Rosner. Interpretation of structure in the di- J/ψ spectrum. Phys. Rev. D , 102(11):114039, 2020

    2020

  80. [80]

    Revisit the tetraquark candidates in th e J/ψJ/ψ mass spectrum

    Zhi-Gang Wang. Revisit the tetraquark candidates in th e J/ψJ/ψ mass spectrum. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A , 36(02):2150014, 2021

    2021

Showing first 80 references.