pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00121 · v1 · pith:4ZIUA37Snew · submitted 2026-06-30 · 💻 cs.IT · eess.SP· math.IT

Decision Feedback Differential Detection for Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces

Jiawei Qiu , Harry Leib This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 17:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IT eess.SPmath.IT
keywords reconfigurable intelligent surfacesdifferential modulationdecision feedback detectiontime-varying channelserror floorsdifferential space-time modulationMonte Carlo simulations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Decision feedback differential detection achieves low error floors for RIS differential modulation in time-varying channels.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes using decision feedback differential detection for differential reflecting modulation schemes in reconfigurable intelligent surfaces. The goal is to avoid the high error floors that conventional differential demodulation experiences over time-varying fading channels. A sympathetic reader would care because this approach enables reliable communication without needing channel state information, which is hard to obtain in dynamic settings. Simulations show that DFDD maintains improving performance as SNR increases, unlike standard methods that plateau at high error rates. The trade-off is a modest increase in receiver complexity.

Core claim

The paper claims that applying decision feedback differential detection to differential reflecting modulation for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces yields low error floors over time-varying fading channels, in contrast to conventional differential demodulation which encounters high error floors, and that this holds across various RIS scenarios when parameters are chosen appropriately.

What carries the argument

Decision Feedback Differential Detection (DFDD) technique applied to Differential Reflecting Modulation (DRM), which uses previous decisions to improve detection and reduce error propagation in time-varying conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The simulations use a time-varying fading channel model that matches real-world conditions, and feedback decisions stay reliable without causing error propagation.

What would settle it

Running Monte Carlo simulations or field tests with a different time-varying channel model, such as one with faster fading rates, and observing if the error floor remains low or rises significantly with DFDD.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00121 by Harry Leib, Jiawei Qiu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: DFDD-detected DRM encoding structure The equivalent system to [40, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The structure of a DFDD receiver. feedback symbolsXˆ [t − (v − 1)] as vY−1 µ=1 Xˆ [t − µ] =    Xˆ [t − (v − 1)] · · · Xˆ [t − 1], v > 1 IK, v = 1 (8) . Then, the decision variable for the DFDD receiver is formed as Y˜ [t] = Yˆ H [t]Y [t], (9) and the decision rule is given by [44] Xˆ [t] = arg max X[t]∈X ℜ h tr  X[t]Y˜ H [t] i , (10) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: BER performance of the DFDD-detected DRM system with BPSK when K = 2, fDTs = 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, and V = 1, 2, 3. -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 SNR(dB) 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 BER 0.01, 1 0.01, 2 0.01, 3 0.02, 1 0.02, 2 0.02, 3 0.03, 1 0.03, 2 0.03, 3 fDT s ,V [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: BER performance of the DFDD-detected DRM system with BPSK when K = 4, fDTs = 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, and V = 1, 2, 3. -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 SNR(dB) 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 BER 0.01, 1 0.01, 2 0.01, 3 0.02, 1 0.02, 2 0.02, 3 0.03, 1 0.03, 2 0.03, 3 fDT s ,V [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: BER performance of the DFDD-detected DRM system with QPSK when K = 3, fDTs = 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, and V = 1, 2, 3. -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 SNR(dB) 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 BER 0.01, 1 0.01, 2 0.01, 3 0.02, 1 0.02, 2 0.02, 3 0.03, 1 0.03, 2 0.03, 3 fDT s ,V [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: BER performance of DRM„ DRM-DSTM with CDD and DRM with DFDD for K = 2. and fDTs = 0.01 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 SNR(dB) 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 BER Uncoded,M=2 Uncoded,M=4 Coded,(2;1,1,1) Coded,(4;1,1,1) DFDD,M=2 DFDD,M=4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: BER performance of DRM„ DRM-DSTM with CDD and DRM with DFDD for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This work considers a Differential Reflecting Modulation (DRM) scheme for Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces (RIS) not requiring channel state information (CSI). When operating over time-varying fading channels, such schemes with Conventional Differential Demodulation (CDD) receivers experience high error floors and performance degradation. To address these issues, we propose a Decision Feedback Differential Detection (DFDD) technique for DRM. We explore the application of DFDD for RIS DRM and conduct extensive Monte-Carlo simulations to analyze performance. Results demonstrate the viability of our DFDD technique across various RIS scenarios and highlight the importance of proper parameter selection to achieve good performance. The DFDD scheme is also compared with uncoded and Differential Space-Time Modulation (DSTM) coded DRM using CDD based receivers. We observe that at low SNR, the DFDD scheme performs almost as well as the DRM with CDD scheme, but worse than the DSTM coded DRM. As the SNR increases however, both CDD-detected systems encounter high error floors while the error rate of DFDD based scheme continues to improve until it reaches a relatively low error floor. It is shown that the chief merits of employing DFDD receivers in such RIS systems is the low error floors they provide over time varying fading channels, albeit at expense of a small increased complexity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Decision Feedback Differential Detection (DFDD) for Differential Reflecting Modulation (DRM) in RIS systems without CSI. It argues that Conventional Differential Demodulation (CDD) suffers high error floors on time-varying channels, while DFDD yields lower floors (at modest complexity cost) as shown by Monte Carlo simulations comparing it to CDD and DSTM-coded DRM.

Significance. If the Monte Carlo results are representative, the work supplies a practical receiver technique that mitigates error-floor degradation in differential RIS modulation under channel time variation. The explicit comparison to DSTM and the emphasis on parameter selection for performance are useful contributions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Simulation results] Simulation results section: The time-varying fading channel model (correlation structure, Doppler spread, or Markov parameter) and exact error-floor definitions are not specified, so the central claim that DFDD achieves low floors rests on unreproducible Monte Carlo runs whose generality cannot be assessed.
  2. [Proposed DFDD technique] DFDD receiver description: No analytical bound or sensitivity study is given on decision-error propagation probability, which is load-bearing for the assertion that DFDD reliably outperforms CDD rather than merely shifting the floor under the assumed correlation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'various RIS scenarios' is used without enumerating the configurations (number of elements, modulation order, etc.) that were tested.
  2. [Conclusion] Complexity discussion: The 'small increased complexity' is stated qualitatively; a table or flop-count comparison with CDD would strengthen the trade-off claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to enhance reproducibility and address the concerns raised.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Simulation results] Simulation results section: The time-varying fading channel model (correlation structure, Doppler spread, or Markov parameter) and exact error-floor definitions are not specified, so the central claim that DFDD achieves low floors rests on unreproducible Monte Carlo runs whose generality cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that the simulation setup requires more explicit specification for reproducibility. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection detailing the time-varying channel model, including the correlation structure (e.g., Jakes' model or equivalent), Doppler spread values, Markov parameters if used, and the precise definition of error floor (e.g., the SNR regime and BER threshold at which the floor is observed). This will allow readers to assess the generality of the Monte Carlo results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Proposed DFDD technique] DFDD receiver description: No analytical bound or sensitivity study is given on decision-error propagation probability, which is load-bearing for the assertion that DFDD reliably outperforms CDD rather than merely shifting the floor under the assumed correlation.

    Authors: The manuscript is primarily simulation-driven and does not derive analytical bounds on error propagation. We acknowledge this as a valid point. In revision, we will add a brief sensitivity analysis subsection that examines the impact of decision errors under varying correlation coefficients, including a discussion of propagation probability based on the simulation parameters. This will strengthen the claim without requiring a full analytical derivation, which is outside the current scope. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: central claims are Monte Carlo simulation outcomes with no derivations reducing to inputs by construction.

full rationale

The paper proposes a DFDD receiver for DRM over RIS and evaluates it exclusively via Monte Carlo simulations comparing error rates against CDD and DSTM baselines. No equations, parameter fits, or uniqueness theorems are presented that could reduce to self-definition or fitted-input predictions. The abstract and provided text contain no self-citations that bear load on any derivation, and the performance claims are explicitly simulation-dependent rather than analytically self-referential. This matches the default case of a self-contained empirical study with no circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the performance claims implicitly rest on an unstated time-varying fading channel model and the assumption that decision feedback does not introduce unmodeled error propagation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5755 in / 1036 out tokens · 18864 ms · 2026-07-02T17:27:33.823198+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces in 6G radio localization: A survey of recent developments, opportunities, and challenges,

    A. Umer, I. Müürsepp, M. M. Alam, and H. Wymeersch, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces in 6G radio localization: A survey of recent developments, opportunities, and challenges,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 3526–3560, 2025

    2025

  2. [2]

    RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO systems for 6G: Fundamentals, system design, and applications,

    E. Shi, J. Zhang, H. Du, B. Ai, C. Yuen, D. Niyato, K. B. Letaief, and X. Shen, “RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO systems for 6G: Fundamentals, system design, and applications,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 331–364, 2024

    2024

  3. [3]

    Multi-IRS enhanced wireless coverage: Deployment optimization based on large- scale channel knowledge,

    M. Fu, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “Multi-IRS enhanced wireless coverage: Deployment optimization based on large- scale channel knowledge,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , 2025

    2025

  4. [4]

    Intelligent re- flecting surfaces for integrated sensing and communications: From system coexistence to networked mutualism,

    Q. Wu, Q. Peng, Z. Zhang, X. Shao, Y. Liu, Y. Jiang, Y. Zhao, Y. Zhu, Y. Chen, Z. Ren, et al. , “Intelligent re- flecting surfaces for integrated sensing and communications: From system coexistence to networked mutualism,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , 2026. 28

    2026

  5. [5]

    Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Energy Efficiency in Wireless Communication,

    C. Huang, A. Zappone, G. C. Alexandropoulos, M. Debbah, and C. Yuen, “Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Energy Efficiency in Wireless Communication,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 4157–4170, 2019

    2019

  6. [6]

    Smart radio environments empowered by reconfigurable AI meta-surfaces: An idea whose time has come,

    M. D. Renzo, M. Debbah, D.-T. Phan-Huy, A. Zappone, M.-S. Alouini, C. Yuen, V. Sciancalepore, G. C. Alexandropoulos, J. Hoydis, H. Gacanin, et al. , “Smart radio environments empowered by reconfigurable AI meta-surfaces: An idea whose time has come,” EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking , vol. 2019, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2019

    2019

  7. [7]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces vs. relaying: Differences, similarities, and performance comparison,

    M. Di Renzo, K. Ntontin, J. Song, F. H. Danufane, X. Qian, F. Lazarakis, J. De Rosny, D.-T. Phan-Huy, O. Simeone, R. Zhang, et al. , “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces vs. relaying: Differences, similarities, and performance comparison,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , vol. 1, pp. 798–807, 2020

    2020

  8. [8]

    Smart Radio Environments Empowered by Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: How It Works, State of Research, and The Road Ahead,

    M. Di Renzo, A. Zappone, M. Debbah, M.-S. Alouini, C. Yuen, J. de Rosny, and S. Tretyakov, “Smart Radio Environments Empowered by Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: How It Works, State of Research, and The Road Ahead,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2450–2525, 2020

    2020

  9. [9]

    Hybrid RIS-Assisted Receive Generalized Space Shift Keying for Wireless Communication,

    M. Yue, Y. Peng, A.-H. Fawaz, and J. Lee, “Hybrid RIS-Assisted Receive Generalized Space Shift Keying for Wireless Communication,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , 2026

    2026

  10. [10]

    RIS-Assisted Joint Transmitter-Receiver Space Shift Keying Design for Highly Flexible Wireless Communications,

    M. Yue, Y. Peng, R. Ye, J. Lee, F. Al-Hazemi, and R. Boutaba, “RIS-Assisted Joint Transmitter-Receiver Space Shift Keying Design for Highly Flexible Wireless Communications,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2026

    2026

  11. [11]

    RIS-Aided OTFS With Index Modulation: Performance Analysis and Phase Optimization,

    B. Zhang, L. Mei, K. C. Teh, and E. Basar, “RIS-Aided OTFS With Index Modulation: Performance Analysis and Phase Optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 25, pp. 16245–16258, 2026

    2026

  12. [12]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surface-based index modulation: A new beyond MIMO paradigm for 6G,

    E. Basar, “Reconfigurable intelligent surface-based index modulation: A new beyond MIMO paradigm for 6G,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 3187–3196, 2020

    2020

  13. [13]

    Wireless communications through reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    E. Basar, M. Di Renzo, J. De Rosny, M. Debbah, M.-S. Alouini, and R. Zhang, “Wireless communications through reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 116753–116773, 2019

    2019

  14. [14]

    Reflecting Modulation,

    S. Guo, S. Lv, H. Zhang, J. Ye, and P. Zhang, “Reflecting Modulation,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2548–2561, 2020

    2020

  15. [15]

    Intelligent reflecting surface-assisted multi-user MISO communication: Channel estimation and beamforming design,

    H. Alwazani, A. Kammoun, A. Chaaban, M. Debbah, M.-S. Alouini, et al., “Intelligent reflecting surface-assisted multi-user MISO communication: Channel estimation and beamforming design,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 1, pp. 661–680, 2020

    2020

  16. [16]

    Low-overhead channel estimation framework for beyond diagonal reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted multi-user MIMO communication,

    R. Wang, S. Zhang, B. Clerckx, and L. Liu, “Low-overhead channel estimation framework for beyond diagonal reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted multi-user MIMO communication,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 73, pp. 4700–4717, 2025

    2025

  17. [17]

    Channel estimation for beyond diagonal RIS via tensor decomposition,

    A. L. de Almeida, B. Sokal, H. Li, and B. Clerckx, “Channel estimation for beyond diagonal RIS via tensor decomposition,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , 2025

    2025

  18. [18]

    Channel Estimation for RIS-Aided MU-MIMO mmWave Systems With Practical Hybrid Architecture,

    L. Zhuo, C. Pan, H. Ren, R. Weng, S. Jin, A. L. Swindlehurst, and J. Wang, “Channel Estimation for RIS-Aided MU-MIMO mmWave Systems With Practical Hybrid Architecture,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , vol. 73, pp. 5213–5228, 2025

    2025

  19. [19]

    Mutual coupling-aware channel estimation and beamforming for RIS-assisted communications,

    P. Zheng, S. Tarboush, H. Sarieddeen, and T. Y. Al-Naffouri, “Mutual coupling-aware channel estimation and beamforming for RIS-assisted communications,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , 2025

    2025

  20. [20]

    Environment-aware IRS deployment via channel knowledge map: Joint sensing-communications coverage optimization,

    Y. Chen, Z. Ren, J. Xu, and R. Zhang, “Environment-aware IRS deployment via channel knowledge map: Joint sensing-communications coverage optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering , 2026. 29

    2026

  21. [21]

    AI-Driven Channel State Information (CSI) Extrapolation for 6G: Current Situations, Challenges, and Future Research,

    Y. Gao, Z. Lu, X. Wu, W. Yu, S. Liu, J. Du, Y. Jin, S. Zhang, X. Chu, and S. Xu, “AI-Driven Channel State Information (CSI) Extrapolation for 6G: Current Situations, Challenges, and Future Research,” IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials , vol. 28, pp. 4485–4518, 2026

    2026

  22. [22]

    Intelligent reflecting surface meets OFDM: Protocol design and rate maximization,

    Y. Yang, B. Zheng, S. Zhang, and R. Zhang, “Intelligent reflecting surface meets OFDM: Protocol design and rate maximization,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 4522–4535, 2020

    2020

  23. [23]

    Parallel Factor Decomposition Channel Estimation in RIS-Assisted Multi-User MISO Communication,

    L. Wei, C. Huang, G. C. Alexandropoulos, and C. Yuen, “Parallel Factor Decomposition Channel Estimation in RIS-Assisted Multi-User MISO Communication,” in 2020 IEEE 11th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM), pp. 1–5, 2020

    2020

  24. [24]

    Asymptotic Max-Min SINR Analysis of Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Assisted MISO Systems,

    Q.-U.-A. Nadeem, A. Kammoun, A. Chaaban, M. Debbah, and M.-S. Alouini, “Asymptotic Max-Min SINR Analysis of Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Assisted MISO Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 7748–7764, 2020

    2020

  25. [25]

    Intelligent Reflecting Surface-Assisted Multi-User MISO Communication: Channel Estimation and Beamforming Design,

    Q.-U.-A. Nadeem, H. Alwazani, A. Kammoun, A. Chaaban, M. Debbah, and M.-S. Alouini, “Intelligent Reflecting Surface-Assisted Multi-User MISO Communication: Channel Estimation and Beamforming Design,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , vol. 1, pp. 661–680, 2020

    2020

  26. [26]

    Scaling Laws for Noncoherent Energy-Based Communications in the SIMO MAC,

    M. Chowdhury, A. Manolakos, and A. Goldsmith, “Scaling Laws for Noncoherent Energy-Based Communications in the SIMO MAC,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1980–1992, 2016

    1980

  27. [27]

    SER-Optimized Multi-Level ASK Modulations for RIS- Assisted Communications with Energy-and Sign-Based Noncoherent Reception,

    S. Mishra, S. P. Dash, and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “SER-Optimized Multi-Level ASK Modulations for RIS- Assisted Communications with Energy-and Sign-Based Noncoherent Reception,” IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking , 2025

    2025

  28. [28]

    Design of non-coherent RIS-empowered DCSK with two- level nested index modulation,

    X. Cai, C. Huang, P. Chen, E. Basar, and C. Yuen, “Design of non-coherent RIS-empowered DCSK with two- level nested index modulation,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 3044–3058, 2025

    2025

  29. [29]

    Toward RIS-Aided Non-Coherent Communications: A Joint Index Keying M-ary Differential Chaos Shift Keying System,

    X. Cai, C. Huang, E. Basar, W. Xu, L. Wang, M. D. Renzo, and C. Yuen, “Toward RIS-Aided Non-Coherent Communications: A Joint Index Keying M-ary Differential Chaos Shift Keying System,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 9045–9062, 2023

    2023

  30. [30]

    Non-coherent modulation with random phase configu- rations in RIS-empowered cellular MIMO systems,

    K. Chen-Hu, G. Alexandropoulos, and A. G. Armada, “Non-coherent modulation with random phase configu- rations in RIS-empowered cellular MIMO systems,” ITU J Future Evolving Technol , vol. 3, pp. 374–387, 2022

    2022

  31. [31]

    Non-Coherent Chaotic Communications Aided by RIS: A Performance-Enhanced Approach,

    X. Cai, C. Huang, J. An, W. Xu, L. Wang, and C. Yuen, “Non-Coherent Chaotic Communications Aided by RIS: A Performance-Enhanced Approach,” IEEE Communications Letters , vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1614–1618, 2023

    2023

  32. [32]

    Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Aided M -Ary FM-DCSK System: A New Design for Noncoherent Chaos-Based Communication,

    H. Ma, Y. Fang, P. Chen, and Y. Li, “Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Aided M -Ary FM-DCSK System: A New Design for Noncoherent Chaos-Based Communication,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 4829–4843, 2023

    2023

  33. [33]

    Rectangular Differential Reflecting Spatial Modulation: A Noncoherent Joint Index-Modulation of RIS-assisted MIMO System,

    P. Zhang, X. Jin, C. Wan, S. Xing, C. Huang, M. Wen, and Y. Yao, “Rectangular Differential Reflecting Spatial Modulation: A Noncoherent Joint Index-Modulation of RIS-assisted MIMO System,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, pp. 1–1, 2024

    2024

  34. [34]

    Differential Reflecting Modulation for Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Based Communications,

    S. Guo, J. Ye, P. Zhang, H. Zhang, and M.-S. Alouini, “Differential Reflecting Modulation for Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Based Communications,” IEEE Communications Letters , vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 907–910, 2021

    2021

  35. [35]

    The phase of a vector perturbed by Gaussian noise and differentially coherent receivers,

    H. Leib and S. Pasupathy, “The phase of a vector perturbed by Gaussian noise and differentially coherent receivers,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1491–1501, 1988

    1988

  36. [36]

    Bit error rate of binary and quaternary DPSK signals with multiple differential feedback detection,

    F. Edbauer, “Bit error rate of binary and quaternary DPSK signals with multiple differential feedback detection,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 457–460, 1992. 30

    1992

  37. [37]

    Decision-feedback differential detection of MDPSK for flat Rayleigh fading channels,

    R. Schober, W. Gerstacker, and J. Huber, “Decision-feedback differential detection of MDPSK for flat Rayleigh fading channels,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1025–1035, 1999

    1999

  38. [38]

    Decision-feedback differential detection based on linear prediction for MDPSK signals transmitted over Ricean fading channels,

    R. Schober and W. Gerstacker, “Decision-feedback differential detection based on linear prediction for MDPSK signals transmitted over Ricean fading channels,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 391–402, 2000

    2000

  39. [39]

    Tree-Search Multiple-Symbol Differential Decoding for Unitary Space-Time Modula- tion,

    V. Pauli and L. Lampe, “Tree-Search Multiple-Symbol Differential Decoding for Unitary Space-Time Modula- tion,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1567–1576, 2007

    2007

  40. [40]

    Space-time Coded Differential Modulation for Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces,

    J. Qiu and H. Leib, “Space-time Coded Differential Modulation for Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , vol. 7, pp. 2287–2305, 2026

    2026

  41. [41]

    On decision-feedback detection of differential space-time modulation in continuous fading,

    C. Ling, K. Li, and A. Kot, “On decision-feedback detection of differential space-time modulation in continuous fading,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 1613–1617, 2004

    2004

  42. [42]

    Adaptive Coherent/Non- Coherent Single/Multiple-Antenna Aided Channel Coded Ground-to-Air Aeronautical Communication,

    C. Xu, J. Zhang, T. Bai, P. Botsinis, R. G. Maunder, R. Zhang, and L. Hanzo, “Adaptive Coherent/Non- Coherent Single/Multiple-Antenna Aided Channel Coded Ground-to-Air Aeronautical Communication,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 1099–1116, 2019

    2019

  43. [43]

    Bit-interleaved coded differential space-time modulation,

    L.-J. Lampe and R. Schober, “Bit-interleaved coded differential space-time modulation,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 1429–1439, 2002

    2002

  44. [44]

    Space-time coded differential modulation and decision feedback differential detection for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    J. Qiu, “Space-time coded differential modulation and decision feedback differential detection for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,” master’s thesis, McGill University, December 2024

    2024

  45. [45]

    Selective decode-and-forward bidirectional multi-relay networks with regularized weighted decision feedback differential coherent receivers,

    J. Zhang, “Selective decode-and-forward bidirectional multi-relay networks with regularized weighted decision feedback differential coherent receivers,” master’s thesis, McGill University, July 2017

    2017

  46. [46]

    Regularized WDFDC Receivers for Selective Detect-and-Forward Multi-Relaying Systems,

    J. Zhang and H. Leib, “Regularized WDFDC Receivers for Selective Detect-and-Forward Multi-Relaying Systems,” IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology , vol. 1, pp. 130–145, 2020

    2020

  47. [47]

    Regularized WDFDC receivers for selective detect-and-forward multi-relaying systems,

    J. Zhang and H. Leib, “Regularized WDFDC receivers for selective detect-and-forward multi-relaying systems,” IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology , vol. 1, pp. 130–145, 2020

    2020

  48. [48]

    Gradient of mutual information in linear vector Gaussian channels,

    D. Palomar and S. Verdu, “Gradient of mutual information in linear vector Gaussian channels,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 141–154, 2006

    2006

  49. [49]

    A complex gradient operator and its application in adaptive array theory,

    D. H. Brandwood, “A complex gradient operator and its application in adaptive array theory,” in IEE Proceedings H (Microwaves, Optics and Antennas) , vol. 130, pp. 11–16, IET Digital Library, 1983

    1983