pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31060 · v1 · pith:FYMUOK7Knew · submitted 2026-06-30 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Optical Amplification with Large Goos-Hddot{a}nchen Shift Driven by Non-Hermitian Bilayer Meta-Grating

Ma Luo , Xueyi Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 04:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords Goos-Hänchen shiftlasing threshold modeparity-time symmetrymeta-gratingbound states in the continuumnon-Hermitian opticsoptical amplification
0
0 comments X

The pith

Near lasing threshold modes in a PT-symmetric bilayer meta-grating, reflected and transmitted beams amplify while undergoing Goos-Hänchen shifts whose size and sign scale with the inverse of the mode's imaginary frequency part.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that parity-time symmetry in a bilayer meta-grating converts bound states in the continuum into lasing threshold modes that have real resonant frequencies yet radiate into the far field. When an incident frequency approaches one of these modes, both the reflected and transmitted beams become strongly amplified and acquire large Goos-Hänchen shifts. The magnitude and direction of the shifts are proportional to the reciprocal of the imaginary part of the resonant frequency. Crossing the resonance reverses the sign of that imaginary part, causing the shifts to diverge and flip sign. Finite-beam simulations confirm the large-magnitude sign reversal under small frequency detuning.

Core claim

When the incident frequency approaches the resonant frequency of a lasing threshold mode, the reflected and transmitted beams are strongly amplified and undergo large Goos-Hänchen shifts. The amplitude of the Goos-Hänchen shifts, including the magnitude and sign, are proportional to the reciprocal of the imaginary part of the resonant frequencies. As the incident frequency scans across the resonant frequency of a lasing threshold mode, the imaginary part flips sign, so that the Goos-Hänchen shifts diverge as well as flip sign.

What carries the argument

Lasing threshold modes created by parity-time symmetry in the bilayer meta-grating, which convert bound states in the continuum into modes with real resonant frequencies and non-zero far-field radiation.

If this is right

  • Reflected and transmitted beams experience strong amplification near each lasing threshold resonance.
  • Goos-Hänchen shift magnitude can be made arbitrarily large by approaching the resonance while its sign reverses upon crossing.
  • The shifts remain finite and tunable for any small frequency detuning away from the exact resonance.
  • Gaussian-beam simulations already exhibit the predicted sign flip with large magnitude under fine frequency tuning.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Frequency detuning around these modes could serve as a practical knob for dynamic beam steering or switching in optical devices.
  • The same scaling may appear in other non-Hermitian photonic structures that host lasing threshold modes with finite radiation.
  • Realizing the required gain-loss balance would need fabrication tolerances tight enough to keep the imaginary frequency part small but nonzero.

Load-bearing premise

The bilayer meta-grating can be realized with parity-time symmetry that transfers bound states in the continuum into lasing threshold modes possessing real resonant frequencies and non-zero far-field radiation.

What would settle it

Scan the incident frequency of a Gaussian beam across a calculated lasing threshold resonance while recording the lateral displacement of the reflected and transmitted beams; the displacements must grow without bound, reverse sign exactly when the imaginary part of the resonant frequency changes sign, and obey the stated inverse proportionality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31060 by Ma Luo, Xueyi Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a) The structure of one period of the bilayer meta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Field pattern of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Band structure of five bilayer meta-gratings. The plo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The angular spectrum of reflectance and transmittanc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: (a) The imaginary part versus the real part of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The same plotting as those Fig. 6 for the system in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: (a) For the bilayer meta-grating with the same struc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Panel (a,b) and (c) are for the same systems as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Optical Goos-H$\ddot{a}$nchen shifts can be enhanced by resonant mode with high quality factor, such as quasi-bound states in the continuum in meta-grating. Coexistence of gain and loss in bilayer meta-grating with parity-time symmetry could transfer bound states in the continuum into lasing threshold modes with real resonant frequencies and non-zero far-field radiation. When the incident frequency approaches the resonant frequency of a lasing threshold mode, the reflected and transmitted beams are strongly amplified and undergo large Goos-H$\ddot{a}$nchen shifts. The amplitude of the Goos-H$\ddot{a}$nchen shifts, including the magnitude and sign, are proportional to the reciprocal of the imaginary part of the resonant frequencies. As the incident frequency scan across the resonant frequency of a lasing threshold mode, the imaginary part flip sign, so that the Goos-H$\ddot{a}$nchen shifts diverge as well as flip sign. Simulations of optical responses under incident of Gaussian beams with finite beam width exhibit the sign flipping of the Goos-H$\ddot{a}$nchen shift with large magnitude by fine tuning the incident frequency across the resonant frequency of a lasing threshold mode.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes using PT-symmetric bilayer meta-gratings to convert bound states in the continuum into lasing threshold modes. It claims that near these modes the reflected and transmitted beams undergo strong amplification together with large Goos-Hänchen shifts whose magnitude and sign scale with the reciprocal of Im(ω_res). It further states that scanning the incident frequency across resonance causes Im(ω_res) to flip sign, producing divergence and sign reversal of the GH shift, and supports the claim with Gaussian-beam simulations.

Significance. If the stated scaling and sign-flip mechanism were rigorously derived and verified, the result would be of interest for resonant control of beam shifts in non-Hermitian metasurfaces. The absence of any derivation or quantitative verification, combined with an apparent misunderstanding of how complex poles behave, prevents the work from establishing a new, usable design principle.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'as the incident frequency scan across the resonant frequency of a lasing threshold mode, the imaginary part flip sign' is incorrect. The complex resonant frequency ω_res is an eigenvalue fixed by the structure and its gain/loss parameters; it cannot change sign when the driving frequency is varied. This error is load-bearing for the claimed mechanism of GH-shift divergence and sign reversal.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the claimed proportionality 'the amplitude of the Goos-Hänchen shifts, including the magnitude and sign, are proportional to the reciprocal of the imaginary part of the resonant frequencies' is stated without derivation, without reference to the scattering-matrix poles, and without any error analysis or explicit parameter values. Standard stationary-phase or angular-spectrum expressions for GH shift near a resonance depend on detuning from a fixed pole, not on 1/Im(ω_res) in the manner asserted.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that simulations 'exhibit the sign flipping of the Goos-Hänchen shift with large magnitude' supplies no beam-waist values, no comparison with the analytic GH formula, and no quantitative test of the 1/Im(ω_res) scaling.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying the imprecise statements in the abstract. We agree that the wording regarding the imaginary part of the resonant frequency flipping sign with incident frequency is incorrect, as the pole position is fixed by the structure. We will revise the abstract and related text to correct this and to supply the requested derivation. The simulations remain valid as evidence of large, sign-changing GH shifts near the fixed resonance.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'as the incident frequency scan across the resonant frequency of a lasing threshold mode, the imaginary part flip sign' is incorrect. The complex resonant frequency ω_res is an eigenvalue fixed by the structure and its gain/loss parameters; it cannot change sign when the driving frequency is varied. This error is load-bearing for the claimed mechanism of GH-shift divergence and sign reversal.

    Authors: We acknowledge the error in the abstract wording. The resonant frequency ω_res is a fixed complex eigenvalue of the structure. The intended meaning was that the GH shift diverges and reverses sign when the real incident frequency crosses the real part of this fixed ω_res (with magnitude governed by the small |Im(ω_res)|). We will rewrite the abstract and the corresponding discussion to remove any implication that Im(ω_res) itself changes with incident frequency and to state the mechanism in terms of detuning from a fixed pole. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claimed proportionality 'the amplitude of the Goos-Hänchen shifts, including the magnitude and sign, are proportional to the reciprocal of the imaginary part of the resonant frequencies' is stated without derivation, without reference to the scattering-matrix poles, and without any error analysis or explicit parameter values. Standard stationary-phase or angular-spectrum expressions for GH shift near a resonance depend on detuning from a fixed pole, not on 1/Im(ω_res) in the manner asserted.

    Authors: The scaling with 1/Im(ω_res) follows from the stationary-phase approximation applied to the reflection/transmission coefficient near a simple pole of the scattering matrix whose imaginary part sets the resonance width. We agree that an explicit derivation, reference to the scattering-matrix pole, error analysis, and numerical values of the parameters used in the simulations were omitted. In the revision we will insert a short derivation section (or appendix) that starts from the angular-spectrum expression for the GH shift, shows the leading 1/Im(ω_res) dependence for small detuning, and supplies the concrete parameter values together with a brief error estimate. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation appears self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives the claimed proportionality of Goos-Hänchen shift amplitude (including sign) to 1/Im(ω_res) and the associated divergence/sign-flip behavior from the scattering response near a lasing-threshold resonance in the PT-symmetric bilayer structure. No equations or steps are shown that reduce this result to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation; the resonant frequencies are eigenvalues of the structure, and the shift scaling follows from standard near-pole approximations of the reflection/transmission coefficients. The central physical prediction therefore retains independent content relative to the model inputs and is not forced by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides insufficient technical detail to enumerate specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; no explicit fitting constants or new postulated objects are named.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5748 in / 1090 out tokens · 41005 ms · 2026-07-01T04:44:27.697106+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Goos and H

    F. Goos and H. H¨ anchen, Ein neuer und fundamentaler Versuch zur Totalreflexion, Ann. Phys. 436, 333 (1947)

    1947

  2. [2]

    Artmann, Berechnung der Seitenversetzung des total- reflektierten Strahles, Ann

    K. Artmann, Berechnung der Seitenversetzung des total- reflektierten Strahles, Ann. Phys. 437, 87 (1948)

    1948

  3. [3]

    X. Wang, C. Yin, J. Sun, H. Li, Y. Wang, M. Ran, and Z. Cao, High-sensitivity temperature sensor using the ul- trahigh order mode-enhanced Goos-H¨anchen effect, Opt. Express 21, 13380(2013)

    2013

  4. [4]

    X. Wang, M. Sang, W. Yuan, Y. Nie, and H. Luo, Op- tical relative humidity sensing based on oscillating wave- enhanced Goos-H¨anchen shift, IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 28, 264 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    S. Yuan, J. Yang, Y. Wang, Y. Chen and X. Zhou, Highly Sensitive Temperature Sensing via Photonic Spin Hall Effect, Prog. Electromagn. Res. 177, 21-32(2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    K. L. Tsakmakidis, A. D. Boardman, and O. Hess, ’Trapped rainbow’ storage of light in metamaterials, Na- ture 450, 397(2007)

    2007

  7. [7]

    R. Yang, W. Zhu, and J. Li, Realization of ”trapped rainbow” in 1D slab waveguide with surface dispersion engineering, Opt. Express 23, 6326 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Huang and T

    T. Huang and T. Yen, Experimental demonstration of broadband light trapping by exciting surface modes of an all-dielectric taper, Sci. Rep. 9, 3538 (2019)

    2019

  9. [9]

    J. Zhao, X. Wu, D. Zhang, X. Xu, X. Wang and X. Zhao, Amber rainbow ribbon effect in broadband optical meta- materials, Nat. Commun. 15, 2613(2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    Sattari, S

    H. Sattari, S. E. Bakhtevar, and M. Sahrai, Proposal for a 1× 3 Goos-H¨anchen shift-assisted de/multiplexer based on a multilayer structure containing quantum dots, J. Appl. Phys. 120, 133102 (2016)

    2016

  11. [11]

    Sakata, H

    T. Sakata, H. Togo, and F. Shimokawa, Reflection-type 2× 2 optical waveguide switch using the Goos-H¨ anchen shift effect, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 2841 (2000)

    2000

  12. [12]

    Huang, M

    B. Huang, M. Li, A. Luo, and W. Hong, Giant enhance- ment of positive and negative Goos-H¨ anchen shifts in two-dimensional grating waveguide structures support- ing Fano resonances, Phys. Lett. A, 506, 129461 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    H. M. Lai and S. W. Chan, Large and negative Goos- H¨anchen shift near the Brewster dip on reflection from weakly absorbing media, Opt. Lett. 27, 680 (2002)

    2002

  14. [14]

    L. Wang, H. Chen, and S. Zhu, Large negative Goos- H¨anchen shift from a weakly absorbing dielectric slab, Opt. Lett. 30, 2936 (2005)

    2005

  15. [15]

    P. T. Leung, C. W. Chen, and H.-P. Chiang, Large neg- ative Goos-H¨anchen shift at metal surfaces, Opt. Com- mun. 276, 206(2007)

    2007

  16. [16]

    X. Yin, L. Hesselink, Z. Liu, N. Fang, and X. Zhang, Large positive and negative lateral optical beam displace- ments due to surface plasmon resonance, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 372(2004)

    2004

  17. [17]

    Yin and L

    X. Yin and L. Hesselink, Goos-H¨ anchen shift surface plasmon resonance sensor, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 261108 (2006)

    2006

  18. [18]

    V. J. Yallapragada, A. P. Ravishankar, G. L. Mulay, G. S. Agarwal, and V. G. Achanta, Observation of giant Goos-H¨anchen and angular shifts at designed metasur- faces, Sci. Rep. 6, 19319 (2016)

    2016

  19. [19]

    Y. Wang, Y. Hu, R. Xie, Q. Zeng, Y. Hong, X. Chen, P. Zhang, L. Zeng, Y. Zhang, S. Zeng, and H. Yang, Ultrasensitive label-free miRNA-21 detection based on MXene-enhanced plasmonic lateral displacement mea- surement, Nanophotonics 12, 4055 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    Badshah, A

    F. Badshah, A. Sohrab, Y.-L. Chuang, Ziauddin, Z. Shi, and S.-H. Dong, Advanced manipulation of surface plas- mon resonance and the Goos-H¨anchen shift in a coupler- 10 free system, Phys. Rev. A 111, 033702(2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    Li and Q

    C.-F. Li and Q. Wang, Prediction of simultaneously larg e and opposite generalized Goos-H¨anchen shifts for TE and TM light beams in an asymmetric double-prism configu- ration, Phys. Rev. E 69, 055601(R) (2004)

    2004

  22. [22]

    Wang and S

    L. Wang and S. Zhu, Giant lateral shift of a light beam at the defect mode in one-dimensional photonic crystals, Opt. Lett. 31, 101 (2006)

    2006

  23. [23]

    K. V. Sreekanth, Q. Ouyang, S. Han, K.-T. Yong, and R. Singh, Giant enhancement of Goos-H¨ anchen shift at the singular phase of a nanophotonic cavity, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 161109 (2018)

    2018

  24. [24]

    F. Wu, T. Liu, M. Luo, H. Li, and S. Xiao, Giant Goos- H¨anchen shifts with high reflection driven by Fabry-Perot quasibound states in the continuum in double-layer grat- ings, Phys. Rev. B 109, 125411(2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    I. V. Soboleva, V. V. Moskalenko, and A. A. Fedyanin, Giant Goos-H¨anchen effect and Fano resonance at pho- tonic crystal surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 123901 (2012)

    2012

  26. [26]

    Y. Wan, Z. Zheng, W. Kong, X. Zhao, Y. Liu, Y. Bian, and J. Liu, Nearly three orders of magnitude enhance- ment of Goos-H¨anchen shift by exciting Bloch surface wave, Opt. Express 20, 8998 (2012)

    2012

  27. [27]

    J. Tang, J. Xu, Z. Zheng, H. Dong, J. Dong, S. Qian, J. Guo, L. Jiang, and Y. Xiang, Graphene Tamm plasmon- induced giant Goos-H¨anchen shift at terahertz frequen- cies, Chin, Opt. Lett. 17, 020007 (2019)

    2019

  28. [28]

    J. Wu, F. Wu, K. Lv, Z. Guo, H. Jiang, Y. Sun, Y. Li, and H. Chen, Giant Goos-H¨ anchen shift with a high reflectance assisted by interface states in photonic het- erostructures, Phys. Rev. A 101, 053838 (2020)

    2020

  29. [29]

    Y. Ye, W. Chen, S. Wang, Y. Liu, and L. Jiang, En- hanced and tunable Goos-H¨anchen effect of reflected light due to Tamm surface plasmons with Dirac semimetals, Results Phys. 43, 106105 (2022)

    2022

  30. [30]

    F. Wu, J. Wu, Z. Guo, H. Jiang, Y. Sun, Y. Li, J. Ren and H. Chen, Giant Enhancement of the Goos-H¨ anchen Shift Assisted by Quasibound States in the Continuum, Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 014028(2019)

    2019

  31. [31]

    F. Wu, M. Luo, J. Wu, C. Fan, X. Qi, Y. Jian, D. Liu, S. Xiao, G. Chen, H. Jiang, Y. Sun and H. Chen, Dual quasibound states in the continuum in compound grat- ing waveguide structures for large positive and negative Goos-H¨anchen shifts with perfect reflection, Phys. Rev. A 104, 023518(2021)

    2021

  32. [32]

    Luo and F

    M. Luo and F. Wu, Refractive-index sensing based on large negative Goos-H¨anchen shifts of a wavy dielectric grating, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 014050(2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    F. Lima, T. Dumelow, E. L. Albuquerque, and J. A. P. da Costa, Power flow associated with the Goos- H¨anchen shift of a normally incident electromagnetic beam reflected off an antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 79, 155124(2009)

    2009

  34. [34]

    W. J. Yu, H. Sun, and L. Gao, Enhanced normal- incidence Goos-H¨anchen effects induced by magnetic sur- face plasmons in magneto-optical metamaterials, Opt. Express 26, 3956-3973 (2018)

    2018

  35. [35]

    Ma, R.-X

    H. Ma, R.-X. Wu, Nonreciprocal normal-incidence lat- eral shift for transmitted wave beams through the mag- netic photonic crystal slab, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 071104 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    Ma, R.-X

    H. Ma, R.-X. Wu, Enhancing the nonreciprocal Goos- H¨anchen shift by the Fano resonance of coupled gyro- magnetic chains at normal incidence, Opt. Express 30, 46031-46039 (2022)

    2022

  37. [37]

    Luo, Goos-H¨anchen shift of a normally incident beam on a magneto-optical metagrating, Phys

    M. Luo, Goos-H¨anchen shift of a normally incident beam on a magneto-optical metagrating, Phys. Rev. B 113, 035433(2026)

    2026

  38. [38]

    M. Gong, Z. Zhang, Q. Tu, P. Hu, C. Peng and Z. Gao, Giant Goos-H¨anchen Shift with Stable High-Efficiency Emission Enabled by Topological High-Q Unidirectional Guided Resonances, ACS Photonics 12, 10, 5464-5471 (2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    Luo and F

    M. Luo and F. Wu, 2025 Coherent Goos-H¨ anchen shifts of meta-grating with radiation asymmetry, Opts. Comn. B 596, 132387(2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    Xu and M

    Z. Xu and M. Luo, Goos-H¨anchen shifts of a bilayer meta- grating with unidirectional guide resonance, Phys. Rev. B 113, 155404(2026)

    2026

  41. [41]

    Ma and L

    P. Ma and L. Gao, Large and tunable lateral shifts in one-dimensional PT-symmetric layered structures, Opt. Express 25(9), 9676-9688(2017)

    2017

  42. [42]

    Y. Cao, Y. Fu, Q. Zhou, Y. Xu, L. Gao and H. Chen, Giant Goos-H¨anchen shift induced by bounded states in optical PT-symmetric bilayer structures, Opt. Express 27, 7857-7867(2019)

    2019

  43. [43]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real Spectra in Non- Hermitian Hamiltonians Having PT Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243(1998)

    1998

  44. [44]

    R¨uter, K

    C. R¨uter, K. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, D. Christodoulides, M. Segev and D. Kip, Observation of parity-time sym- metry in optics, Nature Phys. 6, 192-195(2010)

    2010

  45. [45]

    B. Peng, S. ¨Ozdemir, F. Lei, F. Monifi, M. Gianfreda, G. L. Long, S. Fan, F. Nori, C. M. Bender and L. Yang, Parity-time-symmetric whispering-gallery microcavitie s. Nature Phys. 10, 394-398(2014)

    2014

  46. [46]

    El-Ganainy, M

    R. El-Ganainy, M. Khajavikhan, D. N. Christodoulides and S. K. Ozdemir, The dawn of non-Hermitian optics. Commun Phys. 2, 37(2019)

    2019

  47. [47]

    Hodaei, A

    H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides and M. Khajavikhan, Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points, Nature 548, 187-191(2017)

    2017

  48. [48]

    Shui, W.-X

    T. Shui, W.-X. Yang, S. Liu, L. Li and Z. Zhu, Asym- metric diffraction by atomic gratings with optical PT symmetry in the Raman-Nath regime, Phys. Rev. A 97, 033819(2018)

    2018

  49. [49]

    J. Gao, C. Hang and G. Huang, Linear and nonlinear Bragg diffraction by electromagnetically induced gratings with PT symmetry and their active control in a Rydberg atomic gas, Phys. Rev. A 105, 063511(2022)

    2022

  50. [50]

    Popov, S

    V. Popov, S. Tretyakov and A. Novitsky, Brewster effect when approaching exceptional points of degen- eracy: Epsilon-near-zero behavior, Phys. Rev. B 99, 045146(2019)

    2019

  51. [51]

    Li and C

    Y. Li and C. Argyropoulos, Exceptional points and spec- tral singularities in active epsilon-near-zero plasmonic waveguides, Phys. Rev. B 99, 075413(2019)

    2019

  52. [52]

    Q. Song, J. Hu, S. Dai, C. Zheng, D. Han, J. Zi, Z. Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Coexistence of a new type of bound state in the continuum and a lasing threshold mode induced by PT symmetry, Sci. Adv. 6, eabc1160(2020)

    2020

  53. [53]

    Q. Song, Z. Yi, H. Xiang and D. Han, Parity-time- symmetry-induced Janus bound states in the continuum and rings of lasing threshold modes, Phys. Rev. A 112, 11 063517(2025)

    2025

  54. [54]

    Zhuang, H.-L

    Z.-P. Zhuang, H.-L. Zeng, X.-D. Chen, X.-T. He, and J.-W. Dong, Topological Nature of Radiation Asym- metry in Bilayer Metagratings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 113801(2024)

    2024