A lower bound for relative symplectic cohomology barcode entropy
Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 14:20 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
The barcode entropy of relative symplectic cohomology SH_M(K) is bounded below by the topological entropy of the Reeb flow on any hyperbolic invariant set it contains.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We show that the barcode entropy of SH_M(K) is bounded below by the topological entropy of the Reeb flow restricted to a hyperbolic invariant set when the Reeb flow on ∂K possesses such a set.
What carries the argument
Barcode entropy of the persistence module SH_M(K), which extracts the exponential growth rate of not-too-short bars and is compared directly to the topological entropy of the Reeb flow on a hyperbolic invariant set.
If this is right
- Positive topological entropy of the Reeb flow on a hyperbolic set forces the barcode entropy of SH_M(K) to be positive.
- The growth rate of bars in the persistence module is controlled from below by a concrete dynamical quantity on the boundary.
- The bound supplies a way to read off lower estimates for the algebraic complexity of relative symplectic cohomology from the existence of chaotic Reeb orbits.
- The result applies whenever the boundary Reeb flow contains a hyperbolic set, regardless of the ambient manifold M.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The same comparison technique might extend to other Floer-theoretic invariants that admit persistence-module structures.
- Examples with explicitly computable Reeb flows and hyperbolic sets, such as certain ellipsoids, could be used to test sharpness of the bound.
- If the hyperbolic-set hypothesis can be relaxed, the result would apply to a wider class of contact boundaries.
Load-bearing premise
The Reeb flow on the boundary of K must possess a hyperbolic invariant set.
What would settle it
Construct or compute an explicit Liouville domain K where the Reeb flow on ∂K has a hyperbolic invariant set of positive topological entropy yet the barcode entropy of SH_M(K) is strictly smaller than that entropy value.
read the original abstract
In this paper, we continue to study the barcode entropy of relative symplectic cohomology $SH_M(K)$ of a Liouville domain $K$ embedded in a symplectic manifold $M$. This barcode entropy measures the exponential growth rate of the number of not-too-short bars in the persistence module $SH_M(K)$. We prove that this Floer-theoretic invariant admits a nontrivial lower bound in terms of the topological entropy of the Reeb flow on $\partial K$ when the Reeb flow possesses a hyperbolic invariant set. More precisely, we show that the barcode entropy of $SH_M(K)$ is bounded below by the topological entropy of the Reeb flow restricted to a hyperbolic invariant set.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper proves a conditional lower bound: under the hypothesis that the Reeb flow on the boundary of a Liouville domain K ⊂ M possesses a hyperbolic invariant set Λ, the barcode entropy of the relative symplectic cohomology SH_M(K) is at least the topological entropy of the Reeb flow restricted to Λ. The argument constructs a persistence module from Floer data on K and compares its bar growth rate to the orbit growth on Λ via standard techniques in symplectic cohomology and persistence modules.
Significance. If the result holds, it supplies an explicit dynamical lower bound for a Floer-theoretic entropy invariant, connecting barcode entropy to Reeb dynamics on hyperbolic sets. This is potentially useful for producing nontrivial estimates in contact and symplectic geometry when hyperbolic sets are known to exist. The manuscript uses standard Floer-theoretic and persistence-module machinery whose hypotheses align with the stated assumptions.
minor comments (2)
- The abstract and introduction state the main theorem but do not indicate the precise section where the comparison between the persistence module of SH_M(K) and the orbit growth on Λ is carried out; adding an explicit reference to the relevant proposition or theorem number would improve readability.
- Notation for the barcode entropy (e.g., how 'not-too-short bars' are quantified) and the precise definition of the hyperbolic invariant set Λ should be recalled or cross-referenced at the statement of the main theorem for self-contained reading.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their careful reading and positive assessment of the manuscript. The report recommends minor revision but lists no specific major comments or requested changes. We therefore have no individual points to address.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity in derivation chain
full rationale
The central result is a conditional lower bound: barcode entropy of SH_M(K) is at least the topological entropy of the Reeb flow restricted to an explicitly hypothesized hyperbolic invariant set Λ ⊂ ∂K. The argument proceeds via standard Floer data on the Liouville domain, construction of the persistence module for relative symplectic cohomology, and comparison of bar growth rates to orbit growth on Λ. No equation or step reduces by definition to a fitted quantity, self-citation load-bearing premise, or ansatz smuggled from prior work by the same author. The hypothesis on the existence of Λ is stated openly and is not derived from the paper's own constructions. This is the normal case of an independent dynamical lower bound.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
J. Ahn,S 1-equivariant relative symplectic cohomology and relative symplectic capacities, preprint, arXiv:2410.01977
-
[2]
Ahn, Barcode entropy and relative symplectic cohomology, preprint, arXiv:2601.15606
J. Ahn, Barcode entropy and relative symplectic cohomology, preprint, arXiv:2601.15606
-
[3]
Ahn, Comparison of symplectic capacities, preprint, arXiv:2504.10431
J. Ahn, Comparison of symplectic capacities, preprint, arXiv:2504.10431
-
[4]
Cineli, V
E. Cineli, V. Ginzburg and B. Gurel, Topological entropy of Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms: a persistence homology and Floer theory perspective, Mathematische Zeitschrift, 308 (2024), no. 4, Paper No. 73, 38 pp
2024
-
[5]
Cineli, V
E. Cineli, V. Ginzburg, B. Gurel and M. Mazzucchelli, On the barcode entropy of Reeb flows, Selecta Mathematica. New Series, 31 (2025), no. 4, Paper No. 64, 36 pp
2025
- [6]
-
[7]
Chazal, V
F. Chazal, V. de Silva, M. Glisse and S. Oudot, The structure and stability of persistence modules, SpringerBriefs in Mathematics, Springer, [Cham], 2016. x+120 pp, ISBN:978-3-319-42543-6, ISBN:978- 3-319-42545-0
2016
-
[8]
Dickstein, Y
A. Dickstein, Y. Ganor, L. Polterovich and F. Zapolsky, Symplectic topology and ideal-valued measures, Selecta Mathematica. New Series, 30 (2024), no. 5, Paper No. 88, 92 pp
2024
-
[9]
Fernandes, Barcode entropy and wrapped Floer homology
R. Fernandes, Barcode entropy and wrapped Floer homology, prerprint, arXiv:2410.05528
-
[10]
Fernandes, Wrapped Floer homology and hyperbolic sets
R. Fernandes, Wrapped Floer homology and hyperbolic sets, prerprint, arXiv:2501.06654
- [11]
-
[12]
Ginzburg, B
V. Ginzburg, B. Gurel and M. Mazzucchelli, Barcode entropy of geodesic flows, to appear in Journal of the European Mathematical Society
-
[13]
Ganor and S
Y. Ganor and S. Tanny, Floer theory of disjointly supported Hamiltonians on symplectically aspherical manifolds, Algebraic and Geometric Topology, 23 (2023), no. 2, 645 – 732
2023
-
[14]
Katok and B
A. Katok and B. Hasselblatt, Introduction to modern theory of dynamical systems, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 54, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995) xviii+802 pp, ISBN:0-521-34187-6
1995
-
[15]
Meiwes, On the barcode entropy of Lagrangian submanifolds
M. Meiwes, On the barcode entropy of Lagrangian submanifolds, preprint, arXiv:2401.07034
-
[16]
McDuff and D
D. McDuff and D. Salamon,J-holomorphic curves and quantum cohomology, University Lecture Series, 6, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1994. viii+207 pp
1994
-
[17]
C.Y. Mak, Y. Sun and U. Varolgunes, A characterization of heaviness in terms of relative symplectic cohomology, Journal of Topology, 17 (2024), no. 1, Paper No. e12327, 26 pp
2024
-
[18]
Polterovich, D
L. Polterovich, D. Rosen, K. Samvelyan and J. Zhang, Topological persistence in geometry and analysis, University Lecture Series, 74, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, (2020),©2020. xi+128 pp, ISBN:978-1-4704-5495-1
2020
-
[19]
Polterovich, E
L. Polterovich, E. Shelukhin, Autonomous Hamiltonian flows, Hofer’s geometry and persistence modules, Selecta Mathematica. New Series, 22 (2016), no. 1, 227 – 296
2016
-
[20]
Salamon, Lectures on Floer homology, Symplectic geometry and topology (Park City, UT, 1997), IAS/Park City Mathematics Series, 7, 143 – 229
D. Salamon, Lectures on Floer homology, Symplectic geometry and topology (Park City, UT, 1997), IAS/Park City Mathematics Series, 7, 143 – 229. 26 JONGHYEON AHN
1997
-
[21]
Sun, Index bounded relative symplectic cohomology, Algebraic and Geometric Topology, 24 (2024), no
Y. Sun, Index bounded relative symplectic cohomology, Algebraic and Geometric Topology, 24 (2024), no. 9, 4799–4836
2024
-
[22]
Todd and B
F. Todd and B. Hasselblatt, Hyperbolic flows, Zurich Lectures in Advanced Mathematics, EMS Pub- lishing House, Berlin, [2019],©2019. xiv+723 pp, ISBN:978-3-03719-200-9
2019
-
[23]
Varolgunes, Mayer–Vietoris property for relative symplectic cohomology, Geometry and Topology, 25 (2021), 547 - 642
U. Varolgunes, Mayer–Vietoris property for relative symplectic cohomology, Geometry and Topology, 25 (2021), 547 - 642. Institute for Basic Science, Center for Geometry and Physics, Pohang, 37673, South Korea E-mail address:jahn@ibs.re.kr
2021
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.