pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19572 · v2 · pith:MTAAP7ZRnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · 🌀 gr-qc

Timing-Window Mechanism for Chain-Like Transients in Collisions of Radially Excited Boson Stars

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 18:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords boson starshead-on collisionsradially excitedchain-like transientstiming windowbreathing clocknumerical relativityself-interacting scalar field
0
0 comments X

The pith

Chain-like transients in boson star collisions form only when collision time matches the isolated breathing clock.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that chain-like transients during head-on collisions of radially excited boson stars depend on whether the binary collision time aligns with breathing windows defined by isolated single-star evolutions, rather than on radial excitation by itself. For n=2 and lambda=400 configurations, numerical-relativity runs produce visible chains exclusively under this timing match. Varying the initial separation shifts the collision time relative to the same clock and reproduces the pattern, while a fixed-separation test at lambda=500 yields the same ordering of events. This establishes a timing-window mechanism that governs the transient behavior.

Core claim

We show that chain-like transients in head-on collisions of radially excited boson stars are controlled by the binary collision time, not by radial excitation alone. For selected n=2, lambda=400 self-interacting configurations, isolated evolutions define breathing windows that serve as reference clocks. Numerical-relativity simulations show that visible chains form only when the collision time is compatible with the isolated breathing clock. A separation scan shifts the collision time relative to the same clock, confirming the timing-window mechanism. An additional fixed-separation check at lambda=500 shows the same event ordering, indicating that the observed pattern is not unique to the fi

What carries the argument

The timing-window mechanism, in which breathing windows extracted from isolated evolutions act as reference clocks that decide whether visible chains appear during binary collision.

If this is right

  • Visible chains appear only for collision times compatible with the isolated breathing clock.
  • The same event ordering holds when the self-interaction strength is changed from lambda=400 to lambda=500.
  • The transients are governed by binary collision time rather than by radial excitation in isolation.
  • A separation scan that systematically alters collision time reproduces the timing dependence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The timing dependence may allow prediction of collision outcomes from isolated breathing periods alone, reducing the need for full binary runs in some cases.
  • Similar windows could appear in collisions with other radial excitations or self-interaction values beyond those tested.
  • The mechanism implies that individual star oscillation phases can synchronize the global transient morphology during merger.

Load-bearing premise

Breathing windows extracted from isolated single-star evolutions remain valid reference clocks once the two stars begin to interact gravitationally.

What would settle it

A head-on collision simulation in which the collision time lies inside a breathing window yet no chain forms, or lies outside any window yet a chain still forms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19572 by Bo-Xuan Ge.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Representative density snapshots of a visible-chain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Characteristic times in binary head-on collisions at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: For D = 50 and D = 60, the binary collision occurs before the isolated breathing window is reached. No visible chain is formed in these cases. For D = 80 and D = 90, the collision time lies within, or sufficiently close to, the isolated breathing window. FIG. 4. Separation test at fixed |ϕc| = 0.0875. Varying D shifts the collision time relative to the same isolated breathing window. Early collisions do no… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We show that chain-like transients in head-on collisions of radially excited boson stars are controlled by the binary collision time, not by radial excitation alone. For selected \(n=2\), \(\lambda=400\) self-interacting configurations, isolated evolutions define breathing windows that serve as reference clocks. Numerical-relativity simulations show that visible chains form only when the collision time is compatible with the isolated breathing clock. A separation scan shifts the collision time relative to the same clock, confirming the timing-window mechanism. An additional fixed-separation check at \(\lambda=500\) shows the same event ordering, indicating that the observed pattern is not unique to the fiducial self-interaction strength.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines head-on collisions of radially excited boson stars (n=2, λ=400). It claims that chain-like transients arise from a timing-window mechanism: visible chains form only when the binary collision time is compatible with breathing periods measured from isolated single-star evolutions. This is tested by a separation scan that varies initial distance (hence collision time) while referencing the same isolated clock, plus a fixed-separation check at λ=500 that reproduces the same event ordering.

Significance. If the timing-window claim is substantiated, the result identifies a concrete dynamical criterion controlling transient morphology in boson-star collisions, independent of radial excitation level alone. The direct numerical comparison between isolated breathing periods and collision outcomes, together with the reproduction of ordering under changed self-interaction strength, supplies a falsifiable organizing principle that could be tested in other scalar-field configurations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical Results (separation scan)] The separation scan varies initial separation to shift collision time relative to the isolated breathing clock, yet the manuscript provides no measurement of the instantaneous breathing frequency during the pre-overlap approach phase. Without such data it remains possible that mutual gravity alters the effective potential and period before the stars interact strongly, undermining the use of the unperturbed clock as the reference (see abstract description of the separation scan).
  2. [Additional Check at λ=500] The λ=500 fixed-separation check reproduces the event ordering but only varies the self-interaction parameter; it does not address whether the breathing frequency itself drifts under the gravitational perturbation of the approaching companion. This leaves the central timing-window claim vulnerable to the possibility that the reference clock changes before collision.
minor comments (2)
  1. Quantitative error bars or uncertainty ranges on the extracted breathing periods and on the measured collision times should be reported to allow assessment of whether the claimed compatibility is statistically significant.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from an explicit statement of the precise criterion used to declare a collision time 'compatible' with a breathing window (e.g., fractional overlap or phase condition).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each of the major comments below and will incorporate revisions as indicated.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Numerical Results (separation scan)] The separation scan varies initial separation to shift collision time relative to the isolated breathing clock, yet the manuscript provides no measurement of the instantaneous breathing frequency during the pre-overlap approach phase. Without such data it remains possible that mutual gravity alters the effective potential and period before the stars interact strongly, undermining the use of the unperturbed clock as the reference (see abstract description of the separation scan).

    Authors: We agree that a direct measurement of the breathing frequency in the binary system during the approach phase is not provided in the current manuscript. Our analysis uses the breathing periods from isolated single-star evolutions as reference clocks, and the separation scan tests the compatibility of collision times with these periods. The correlation between outcomes and the isolated clock timings across the scan provides evidence that the unperturbed periods serve as a reliable reference in this setup. Nevertheless, to strengthen the presentation, we will revise the manuscript to include a discussion of the approximation's validity, noting that initial separations are large enough that significant perturbations occur only near overlap. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Additional Check at λ=500] The λ=500 fixed-separation check reproduces the event ordering but only varies the self-interaction parameter; it does not address whether the breathing frequency itself drifts under the gravitational perturbation of the approaching companion. This leaves the central timing-window claim vulnerable to the possibility that the reference clock changes before collision.

    Authors: The λ=500 check is intended to show that the event ordering is not specific to λ=400, but we acknowledge it does not directly test the effect of the companion's gravity on the breathing frequency. The separation scan already varies the timing by changing distance, which indirectly probes the robustness. We will add text in the revised manuscript clarifying that the mechanism relies on the isolated clock as an organizing principle, and that the results are consistent with it despite potential perturbations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; empirical timing comparison is self-contained

full rationale

The paper extracts breathing periods from isolated n=2, λ=400 evolutions and uses a separation scan in collision simulations to check whether chain formation occurs only for collision times inside those windows. This constitutes a direct numerical test of compatibility rather than any derivation in which an output is forced by construction from fitted inputs or self-citations. No equations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are shown to reduce the central claim to the isolated-clock definition itself. The result remains falsifiable by the simulations and does not rely on load-bearing self-citation chains.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the domain assumption that isolated breathing periods continue to set the relevant timescale once gravitational interaction begins, plus the choice of specific radial excitation and self-interaction values.

free parameters (2)
  • n=2
    Radial excitation quantum number chosen for the fiducial runs.
  • lambda=400
    Self-interaction coupling selected as the main configuration; a second value lambda=500 is used only for confirmation.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Isolated evolutions define breathing windows that serve as reference clocks during binary collisions.
    Invoked to interpret the collision-time scan results.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5639 in / 1115 out tokens · 31862 ms · 2026-06-30T18:28:03.820147+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Massive boson stars: Waveform-based branch diagnosis with neural reconstruction

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Using an existing numerical-relativity catalogue, the paper builds a branch-conditioned neural reconstruction model that infers boson-star merger outcomes from waveform morphology by comparing reconstruction quality a...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 16 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Timing-Window Mechanism for Chain-Like Transients in Collisions of Radially Excited Boson Stars

    The sequence illustrates the formation, visible stage, and subsequent weakening of the chain-like morphology. In this Letter we show that visible chain-like transients in collisions of radially excited boson stars are controlled by the binary collision time. The relevant clock is the breathing window identified from the corresponding iso- lated evolution....

  2. [2]

    D. J. Kaup, Klein-Gordon Geon, Phys. Rev.172, 1331 (1968)

  3. [3]

    Ruffini and S

    R. Ruffini and S. Bonazzola, Systems of selfgravitating particles in general relativity and the concept of an equa- tion of state, Phys. Rev.187, 1767 (1969)

  4. [4]

    Colpi, S

    M. Colpi, S. L. Shapiro, and I. Wasserman, Boson Stars: Gravitational Equilibria of Selfinteracting Scalar Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 2485 (1986)

  5. [5]

    Seidel and W.-M

    E. Seidel and W.-M. Suen, Dynamical Evolution of Boson Stars. 1. Perturbing the Ground State, Phys. Rev. D42, 384 (1990)

  6. [6]

    Kobayashi, M

    Y. Kobayashi, M. Kasai, and T. Futamase, Does a boson star rotate?, Phys. Rev. D50, 7721 (1994)

  7. [7]

    F. D. Ryan, Spinning boson stars with large selfinteraction, Phys. Rev. D55, 6081 (1997)

  8. [8]

    F. E. Schunck and E. W. Mielke, Rotating boson star as an effective mass torus in general relativity, Phys. Lett. A249, 389 (1998)

  9. [9]

    Balakrishna, E

    J. Balakrishna, E. Seidel, and W.-M. Suen, Dynamical evolution of boson stars. 2. Excited states and selfinter- acting fields, Phys. Rev. D58, 104004 (1998), arXiv:gr- qc/9712064

  10. [10]

    Yoshida and Y

    S. Yoshida and Y. Eriguchi, Rotating boson stars in gen- eral relativity, Phys. Rev. D56, 762 (1997)

  11. [11]

    F. E. Schunck and D. F. Torres, Boson stars with generic selfinteractions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D9, 601 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9911038

  12. [12]

    F. E. Schunck and E. W. Mielke, General relativis- tic boson stars, Class. Quant. Grav.20, R301 (2003), arXiv:0801.0307 [astro-ph]

  13. [13]

    Evolution of 3D Boson Stars with Waveform Extraction

    J. Balakrishna, R. Bondarescu, G. Daues, F. Sid- dhartha Guzman, and E. Seidel, Evolution of 3-D boson stars with waveform extraction, Class. Quant. Grav.23, 2631 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0602078

  14. [14]

    Numerical Simulations of Oscillating Soliton Stars: Excited States in Spherical Symmetry and Ground State Evolutions in 3D

    J. Balakrishna, R. Bondarescu, G. Daues, and M. Bon- darescu, Numerical Simulations of Oscillating Soliton Stars: Excited States in Spherical Symmetry and Ground State Evolutions in 3D, Phys. Rev. D77, 024028 (2008), arXiv:0710.4131 [gr-qc]

  15. [15]

    Compact Boson Stars

    B. Hartmann, B. Kleihaus, J. Kunz, and I. Schaffer, Compact Boson Stars, Phys. Lett. B714, 120 (2012), arXiv:1205.0899 [gr-qc]

  16. [16]

    Siemonsen and W

    N. Siemonsen and W. E. East, Stability of rotating scalar boson stars with nonlinear interactions, Phys. Rev. D 103, 044022 (2021), arXiv:2011.08247 [gr-qc]

  17. [17]

    Evstafyeva, N

    T. Evstafyeva, N. Siemonsen, and W. E. East, Assessing the stability of ultracompact spinning boson stars with nonlinear evolutions, Phys. Rev. D113, 044024 (2026), arXiv:2508.11527 [gr-qc]

  18. [18]

    G. A. Marks, S. J. Staelens, T. Evstafyeva, and U. Sper- hake, Long-Term Stable Nonlinear Evolutions of Ultra- compact Black-Hole Mimickers, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 131402 (2025), arXiv:2504.17775 [gr-qc]

  19. [19]

    Evstafyeva, R

    T. Evstafyeva, R. Rosca-Mead, U. Sperhake, and B. Brugmann, Boson stars in massless and massive scalar-tensor gravity, Phys. Rev. D108, 104064 (2023), arXiv:2310.05200 [gr-qc]. 6

  20. [20]

    G. A. Marks and A. A. Zaif, Boson stars in D≥ 4 di- mensions: stability, oscillation frequencies, and dynam- ical evolutions, Class. Quant. Grav.43, 085014 (2026), arXiv:2510.13988 [gr-qc]

  21. [21]

    G. A. Marks, Perturbations of Solitonic Boson Stars: Nonlinear Radial Stability and Binding Energy (2025) arXiv:2508.11757 [gr-qc]

  22. [22]

    Ma, T.-F

    T.-X. Ma, T.-F. Fang, and Y.-Q. Wang, Boson stars and their frozen states in an infinite tower of higher-derivative gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 542 (2025), arXiv:2406.08813 [gr-qc]

  23. [23]

    Ding, T.-X

    P.-B. Ding, T.-X. Ma, T.-F. Fang, and Y.-Q. Wang, Study of boson stars with wormhole, JHEP04, 033, arXiv:2305.19819 [gr-qc]

  24. [24]

    Liang, J.-R

    C. Liang, J.-R. Ren, S.-X. Sun, and Y.-Q. Wang, Dirac- boson stars, JHEP02, 249, arXiv:2207.11147 [gr-qc]

  25. [25]

    Zhang, S.-X

    Y.-P. Zhang, S.-X. Sun, Y.-Q. Wang, S.-W. Wei, P. La- guna, and Y.-X. Liu, Fate of initially bound timelike geodesics in spherical boson stars, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033187 (2024), arXiv:2310.01178 [gr-qc]

  26. [26]

    Emerging black hole shadow from collapsing boson star,

    Y.-P. Zhang, S.-W. Wei, and Y.-X. Liu, Emerging black hole shadow from collapsing boson star (2025), arXiv:2503.14159 [gr-qc]

  27. [27]

    Boson star-black hole binaries: initial data and head-on collisions

    Z. Ning, Boson star-black hole binaries: initial data and head-on collisions (2026), arXiv:2604.15240 [gr-qc]

  28. [28]

    P. L. B. de S´ a, H. C. D. Lima, C. A. R. Herdeiro, and L. C. B. Crispino, Spherical Einstein-Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin boson stars: Self-interacting solutions and their astro- physical appearance, Phys. Rev. D113, 044037 (2026), arXiv:2511.19206 [gr-qc]

  29. [29]

    C. A. R. Herdeiro and E. Radu, Gregory-Laflamme-type instability of boson strings and related phases in D = 5 Kaluza-Klein theory, JHEP08, 049, arXiv:2503.15069 [gr-qc]

  30. [30]

    Herdeiro, H

    C. Herdeiro, H. Huang, J. Kunz, and E. Radu, Einstein- (complex)-Maxwell static boson stars in AdS, Phys. Lett. B856, 138939 (2024), arXiv:2405.10671 [gr-qc]

  31. [31]

    Ildefonso, M

    P. Ildefonso, M. Zilh˜ ao, C. Herdeiro, E. Radu, and N. M. Santos, Self-interacting dipolar boson stars and their dynamics, Phys. Rev. D108, 064011 (2023), arXiv:2307.00044 [gr-qc]

  32. [32]

    Brito, C

    M. Brito, C. Herdeiro, E. Radu, N. Sanchis-Gual, and M. Zilh˜ ao, Stability and physical properties of spherical excited scalar boson stars, Phys. Rev. D107, 084022 (2023), arXiv:2302.08900 [gr-qc]

  33. [33]

    Formation of Solitonic Stars Through Gravitational Cooling

    E. Seidel and W.-M. Suen, Formation of solitonic stars through gravitational cooling, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 2516 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9309015

  34. [34]

    F. E. Schunck and E. W. Mielke, Boson stars: Rotation, formation, and evolution, Gen. Rel. Grav.31, 787 (1999)

  35. [35]

    Sanchis-Gual, F

    N. Sanchis-Gual, F. Di Giovanni, M. Zilh˜ ao, C. Herdeiro, P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, J. Font, and E. Radu, Nonlinear Dynam- ics of Spinning Bosonic Stars: Formation and Stability, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 221101 (2019), arXiv:1907.12565 [gr-qc]

  36. [36]

    Siemonsen and W

    N. Siemonsen and W. E. East, Binary boson stars: Merger dynamics and formation of rotating remnant stars, Phys. Rev. D107, 124018 (2023), arXiv:2302.06627 [gr-qc]

  37. [37]

    Head-on collisions of boson stars

    C. Palenzuela, I. Olabarrieta, L. Lehner, and S. L. Liebling, Head-on collisions of boson stars, Phys. Rev. D75, 064005 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0612067

  38. [38]

    Orbital Dynamics of Binary Boson Star Systems

    C. Palenzuela, L. Lehner, and S. L. Liebling, Orbital Dynamics of Binary Boson Star Systems, Phys. Rev. D 77, 044036 (2008), arXiv:0706.2435 [gr-qc]

  39. [39]

    Gravitational Wave Signatures of Highly Compact Boson Star Binaries

    C. Palenzuela, P. Pani, M. Bezares, V. Cardoso, L. Lehner, and S. Liebling, Gravitational Wave Signatures of Highly Compact Boson Star Binaries, Phys. Rev. D96, 104058 (2017), arXiv:1710.09432 [gr-qc]

  40. [41]

    Sanchis-Gual, M

    N. Sanchis-Gual, M. Zilh˜ ao, C. Herdeiro, F. Di Giovanni, J. A. Font, and E. Radu, Synchronized gravitational atoms from mergers of bosonic stars, Phys. Rev. D102, 101504 (2020), arXiv:2007.11584 [gr-qc]

  41. [42]

    Bezares, M

    M. Bezares, M. Boˇ skovi´ c, S. Liebling, C. Palenzuela, P. Pani, and E. Barausse, Gravitational waves and kicks from the merger of unequal mass, highly compact boson stars, Phys. Rev. D105, 064067 (2022), arXiv:2201.06113 [gr-qc]

  42. [43]

    Croft, T

    R. Croft, T. Helfer, B.-X. Ge, M. Radia, T. Evstafyeva, E. A. Lim, U. Sperhake, and K. Clough, The gravitational afterglow of boson stars, Class. Quant. Grav.40, 065001 (2023), arXiv:2207.05690 [gr-qc]

  43. [44]

    Sanchis-Gual, M

    N. Sanchis-Gual, M. Zilh˜ ao, and V. Cardoso, Electromag- netic emission from axionic boson star collisions, Phys. Rev. D106, 064034 (2022), arXiv:2207.05494 [gr-qc]

  44. [45]

    Evstafyeva, U

    T. Evstafyeva, U. Sperhake, T. Helfer, R. Croft, M. Ra- dia, B.-X. Ge, and E. A. Lim, Unequal-mass boson-star binaries: initial data and merger dynamics, Class. Quant. Grav.40, 085009 (2023), arXiv:2212.08023 [gr-qc]

  45. [46]

    Siemonsen and W

    N. Siemonsen and W. E. East, Generic initial data for binary boson stars, Phys. Rev. D108, 124015 (2023), arXiv:2306.17265 [gr-qc]

  46. [48]

    Evstafyeva, U

    T. Evstafyeva, U. Sperhake, I. M. Romero-Shaw, and M. Agathos, Gravitational-Wave Data Analysis with High-Precision Numerical Relativity Simulations of Bo- son Star Mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 131401 (2024), arXiv:2406.02715 [gr-qc]

  47. [49]

    Brito, C

    M. Brito, C. Herdeiro, E. Radu, N. Sanchis-Gual, and M. Zilh˜ ao, Stability and collisions of excited spherical boson stars: Glimpses of chains and rings, Phys. Rev. D 113, 024008 (2026), arXiv:2506.06442 [gr-qc]

  48. [50]

    Jaramillo, N

    V. Jaramillo, N. Sanchis-Gual, J. Barranco, A. Bernal, J. C. Degollado, C. Herdeiro, M. Megevand, and D. N´ u˜ nez, Head-on collisions of ℓ-boson stars, Phys. Rev. D105, 104057 (2022), arXiv:2202.00696 [gr-qc]

  49. [51]

    Gravitational scattering of solitonic boson stars: Analytics vs Numerics,

    T. Damour, T. Jain, and U. Sperhake, Gravitational scattering of solitonic boson stars: Analytics vs Numerics (2025), arXiv:2512.00945 [gr-qc]

  50. [57]

    W. G. Cook, P. Figueras, M. Kunesch, U. Sperhake, and S. Tunyasuvunakool, Dimensional reduction in numerical relativity: Modified cartoon formalism and regularization, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D25, 1641013 (2016), arXiv:1603.00362 [gr-qc]

  51. [58]

    W. G. Cook and U. Sperhake, Extraction of gravitational-wave energy in higher dimensional numerical relativity using the Weyl tensor, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 035010 (2017), arXiv:1609.01292 [gr-qc]

  52. [59]

    Ge,Gravitational Waves in Boson Star Mergers, Ph.D

    B.-X. Ge,Gravitational Waves in Boson Star Mergers, Ph.D. thesis, King’s College London (2024)

  53. [60]

    Massive boson stars: Stability and GW emission in head-on mergers

    B.-X. Ge, Massive boson stars: Stability and GW emission in head-on mergers, Phys. Rev. D113, 104065 (2026), arXiv:2512.15242 [gr-qc]

  54. [61]

    B.-X. Ge, E. A. Lim, U. Sperhake, T. Evstafyeva, D. Cors, E. de Jong, R. Croft, and T. Helfer, Dynamics and gravitational radiation of stable and unstable boson-star mergers, Phys. Rev. D112, 124080 (2025), arXiv:2410.23839 [gr-qc]

  55. [62]

    Helfer, U

    T. Helfer, U. Sperhake, R. Croft, M. Radia, B.-X. Ge, and E. A. Lim, Malaise and remedy of binary boson-star initial data, Class. Quant. Grav.39, 074001 (2022), arXiv:2108.11995 [gr-qc]

  56. [63]

    Gravitational Wave Emission from Collisions of Compact Scalar Solitons

    T. Helfer, E. A. Lim, M. A. G. Garcia, and M. A. Amin, Gravitational Wave Emission from Collisions of Compact Scalar Solitons, Phys. Rev. D99, 044046 (2019), arXiv:1802.06733 [gr-qc]

  57. [64]

    G. A. Marks, S. J. Staelens, and U. Sperhake, Black Hole-Boson Star Binaries: Gravitational Wave Signals and Tidal Disruption (2026), arXiv:2604.06312 [gr-qc]