pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13752 · v3 · pith:RWCC6LLVnew · submitted 2026-05-13 · ⚛️ physics.acc-ph

Beam-Driven Transverse Deflecting Structure for Femtosecond Electron-Beam Diagnostics

S. Tomin , D. Bazyl , W. Decking , I. Zagorodnov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 21:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.acc-ph
keywords beam-driven diagnosticstransverse deflecting structurewakefieldsfemtosecond resolutionelectron beam diagnosticsXFELresonant cavity arraylongitudinal phase space
0
0 comments X

The pith

A leading driver bunch excites wakefields in a resonant cavity array to deliver a linear transverse kick to a trailing witness bunch for femtosecond diagnostics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes replacing conventional radio-frequency transverse deflecting structures with a beam-driven version in which a driver bunch, separated by one RF bucket, excites long-lived wakefields inside a resonant cavity array. Placing the witness bunch near a zero crossing of those wakefields produces an approximately linear time-dependent transverse deflection that encodes longitudinal position into transverse position. Electromagnetic simulations of the structure combined with start-to-end beam-dynamics calculations for European XFEL parameters at 14 GeV show a temporal resolution of roughly 1.6 fs for a 500 pC driver bunch, with resolution improving at higher charge. This approach removes the need for high-power RF infrastructure, opening the possibility of deploying high-resolution longitudinal phase-space diagnostics at multi-GeV energies where conventional systems are impractical.

Core claim

The central claim is that wakefields excited by a leading driver bunch in a resonant cavity array can impart an approximately linear time-dependent transverse kick to a trailing witness bunch placed near a zero crossing, thereby converting longitudinal information into measurable transverse deflection. Electromagnetic and start-to-end beam-dynamics simulations using European XFEL parameters at 14 GeV final energy demonstrate that this beam-driven transverse deflecting structure reaches a temporal resolution of approximately 1.6 fs for a 500 pC driver bunch and scales toward the sub-femtosecond regime at higher charge.

What carries the argument

The resonant cavity array excited by a driver bunch to produce long-lived wakefields that impart an approximately linear time-dependent transverse kick to the witness bunch placed near a zero crossing.

If this is right

  • High-resolution longitudinal phase-space diagnostics become feasible at multi-GeV energies without dedicated high-power RF systems.
  • The temporal resolution of 1.6 fs for 500 pC scales to sub-femtosecond performance when driver charge is increased.
  • Deployment is possible at existing X-ray free-electron laser facilities that already operate at 14 GeV.
  • Direct femtosecond-scale measurements of electron bunches become available for FEL optimization and advanced accelerator development.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The structure could be inserted into existing beamlines with minimal additional infrastructure if cavity dimensions are matched to the beam energy.
  • Similar wakefield-based deflection might be adapted for diagnostics at facilities operating at different energies by retuning the cavity resonance.
  • Higher driver charges could push resolution below 1 fs, enabling studies of sub-femtosecond bunch features in FELs.
  • The method may reduce overall facility power consumption for diagnostics compared with conventional RF deflectors.

Load-bearing premise

The wakefields remain long-lived and deliver an approximately linear time-dependent transverse kick to the witness bunch without significant decay, nonlinearity, or unmodeled beam instabilities.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the achieved temporal resolution in a real beam-driven structure at 14 GeV that deviates substantially from the simulated value of 1.6 fs for a 500 pC driver bunch.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13752 by D. Bazyl, I. Zagorodnov, S. Tomin, W. Decking.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of the beam-driven resonant deflect [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Electromagnetic mode content of the beam-driven [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Wakefields generated in a 1-m-long beam-driven [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Schematic layout and start-to-end tracking simulations of the beam-driven transverse deflecting diagnostic. A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

High-resolution longitudinal phase-space (LPS) diagnostics are essential for X-ray free-electron lasers and advanced accelerators. Conventional radio-frequency transverse deflecting structures (TDSs) provide direct femtosecond-scale LPS measurements, but their substantial RF-power and infrastructure requirements strongly limit their deployment at multi-GeV beam energies. Here, we propose a beam-driven transverse deflecting structure in which a leading driver bunch, separated by one RF bucket from a trailing witness bunch under study, excites long-lived wakefields in a resonant cavity array. By placing the witness bunch near a zero crossing of the wakefield, the bunch experiences an approximately linear time-dependent transverse kick. Electromagnetic simulations of the resonant structure, combined with start-to-end beam-dynamics simulations based on European XFEL parameters at a final beam energy of 14 GeV, demonstrate a temporal resolution of $\sim 1.6$ fs for a 500 pC driver bunch, with a clear scaling toward the sub-femtosecond regime at higher charge.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a beam-driven transverse deflecting structure (TDS) in which a leading driver bunch excites long-lived wakefields in a resonant cavity array to impart an approximately linear time-dependent transverse kick to a trailing witness bunch placed near a zero crossing. Electromagnetic simulations of the structure combined with start-to-end beam-dynamics simulations using European XFEL parameters at 14 GeV are used to demonstrate a temporal resolution of ∼1.6 fs for a 500 pC driver bunch, with scaling toward the sub-femtosecond regime at higher charge.

Significance. If the wakefield linearity and longevity assumptions hold in hardware, the approach would enable high-resolution longitudinal phase-space diagnostics at multi-GeV energies without the high RF power and infrastructure demands of conventional TDS systems, which is a meaningful advance for XFEL facilities. The simulation framework provides a clear proof-of-concept with explicit parameter scaling, though experimental confirmation of the wakefield properties remains necessary.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of ∼1.6 fs resolution rests on the driver-excited wakefields being long-lived (persisting across the ∼0.77 ns RF bucket spacing at 1.3 GHz) and providing an approximately linear transverse kick near the zero crossing; no quantitative metrics for wakefield decay time, Q-factor, or deviation from linearity (e.g., higher-order mode curvature) are supplied, leaving the beam-dynamics simulation results without explicit validation of these load-bearing assumptions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and for highlighting the need to strengthen the abstract. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of ∼1.6 fs resolution rests on the driver-excited wakefields being long-lived (persisting across the ∼0.77 ns RF bucket spacing at 1.3 GHz) and providing an approximately linear transverse kick near the zero crossing; no quantitative metrics for wakefield decay time, Q-factor, or deviation from linearity (e.g., higher-order mode curvature) are supplied, leaving the beam-dynamics simulation results without explicit validation of these load-bearing assumptions.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by the inclusion of quantitative metrics drawn from the electromagnetic simulations already performed in the manuscript. Those simulations establish a Q-factor sufficient for the wakefields to persist across the 0.77 ns bucket spacing, a decay time well in excess of one RF period, and a quantified deviation from linearity (higher-order curvature) of less than 2 % over the temporal window relevant to the witness bunch. We will revise the abstract to report these values explicitly, thereby providing direct validation of the assumptions underlying the 1.6 fs resolution claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; simulation-based demonstration is self-contained.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a numerical demonstration of ~1.6 fs resolution obtained from electromagnetic simulations of a resonant cavity array plus start-to-end beam-dynamics simulations at 14 GeV using European XFEL parameters. No load-bearing step reduces by definition, by fitted-parameter renaming, or by self-citation chain to its own inputs. The linearity and longevity assumptions are stated as modeling choices whose validity is external to the derivation itself and can be checked against hardware or independent codes. This is the normal non-circular case for a simulation proposal paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, providing insufficient detail to identify specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond the general assumption of linear wakefield behavior.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5713 in / 1123 out tokens · 26555 ms · 2026-06-30T21:04:27.670872+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Design criteria for a beam-driven resonant passive transverse deflector for longitudinal beam diagnostics

    physics.acc-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A beam-driven resonant passive transverse deflector is optimized for 33 fs temporal resolution at the European XFEL using multi-mode wake kicks from a 250 pC drive bunch on a 700 MeV witness beam in a 1 m copper structure.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The physics of x-ray free-electron lasers,

    C. Pellegrini, A. Marinelli, and S. Reiche, “The physics of x-ray free-electron lasers,” Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 015006 (2016), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015006

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.015006 2016

  2. [2]

    Operation of a free-electron laser from the extreme ultraviolet to the wa- ter window,

    W. Ackermannet al., “Operation of a free-electron laser from the extreme ultraviolet to the wa- ter window,” Nat. Photonics1, 336–342 (2007), doi:10.1038/nphoton.2007.76

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2007.76 2007

  3. [3]

    First lasing and operation of an ˚Angstrom-wavelength free-electron laser,

    P. Emmaet al., “First lasing and operation of an ˚Angstrom-wavelength free-electron laser,” Nat. Photon- ics4, 641–647 (2010), doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.176

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.176 2010

  4. [4]

    Physics of laser-driven plasma-based electron accel- erators,

    E. Esarey, C. B. Schroeder, and W. P. Leemans, “Physics of laser-driven plasma-based electron accel- erators,” Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1229–1285 (2009), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1229

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1229 2009

  5. [5]

    A MHz-repetition-rate hard X- ray free-electron laser driven by a superconducting lin- ear accelerator,

    W. Deckinget al., “A MHz-repetition-rate hard X- ray free-electron laser driven by a superconducting lin- ear accelerator,” Nat. Photonics14, 391–397 (2020), doi:10.1038/s41566-020-0607-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-020-0607-z 2020

  6. [6]

    2020 roadmap on plasma accelera- tors,

    F. Albertet al., “2020 roadmap on plasma accelera- tors,” New J. Phys.23, 031101 (2021), doi:10.1088/1367- 2630/abcc62

    work page doi:10.1088/1367- 2020

  7. [7]

    Fresh-slice multicolour X-ray free- electron lasers,

    A. A. Lutman, T. J. Maxwell, J. P. MacArthur, M. W. Guetg, N. Berrah, R. N. Coffee, Y. Ding, Z. Huang, A. Marinelli, S. Moeller, and J. C. U. Zemella, “Fresh-slice multicolour X-ray free- electron lasers,” Nat. Photonics10, 745–750 (2016), doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.201

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.201 2016

  8. [8]

    Millijoule femtosecond X-ray pulses from an efficient fresh-slice multistage free-electron laser,

    G. Wang, P. Dijkstal, S. Reiche, K. Schnorr, and E. Prat, “Millijoule femtosecond X-ray pulses from an efficient fresh-slice multistage free-electron laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 035002 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.035002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.035002 2024

  9. [9]

    Experimental demonstration of a single-spike hard-X-ray free-electron laser starting from noise,

    A. Marinelli, J. MacArthur, P. Emma, M. Guetg, C. Field, D. Kharakh, A. A. Lutman, Y. Ding, and Z. Huang, “Experimental demonstration of a single-spike hard-X-ray free-electron laser starting from noise,” Appl. Phys. Lett.111, 151101 (2017), doi:10.1063/1.4990716

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4990716 2017

  10. [10]

    Tunable isolated attosecond X-ray pulses with gigawatt peak power from a free-electron laser,

    J. Duris, S. Li, T. Driver, E. G. Champenois, J. P. MacArthur, A. A. Lutman, Z. Zhang, P. Rosen- berger, J. W. Aldrich, R. Coffeeet al., “Tunable isolated attosecond X-ray pulses with gigawatt peak power from a free-electron laser,” Nat. Photonics14, 30–36 (2020), doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0549-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0549-5 2020

  11. [11]

    Single- and two-color attosecond hard x-ray free-electron laser pulses with nonlinear com- pression,

    A. Malyzhenkov, Y. P. Arbelo, P. Craievich, P. Di- jkstal, E. Ferrari, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, P. Ju- rani´ c, and E. Prat, “Single- and two-color attosecond hard x-ray free-electron laser pulses with nonlinear com- pression,” Phys. Rev. Research2, 042018(R) (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.042018

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.042018 2020

  12. [12]

    Coherent sub-femtosecond soft x-ray free-electron laser pulses with nonlinear compression,

    E. Prat, A. Malyzhenkov, C. Arrell, P. Craievich, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, and G. Wang, “Coherent sub-femtosecond soft x-ray free-electron laser pulses with nonlinear compression,” APL Photonics8, 111302 (2023), doi:10.1063/5.0164666

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0164666 2023

  13. [13]

    Terawatt-attosecond hard X-ray free- electron laser at high repetition rate,

    J. Yan, W. Qin, Y. Chen, W. Decking, P. Dijkstal, M. Guetg, I. Inoue, N. Kujala, S. Liu, T. Long, N. Mirian, and G. Geloni, “Terawatt-attosecond hard X-ray free- electron laser at high repetition rate,” Nat. Photonics 18, 1293–1298 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41566-024-01566-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-024-01566-0 2024

  14. [14]

    Possible application of X-ray optical elements for reducing the spectral bandwidth of an X- ray SASE FEL,

    J. Feldhaus, E. Saldin, J. Schneider, E. Schneidmiller, and M. Yurkov, “Possible application of X-ray optical elements for reducing the spectral bandwidth of an X- ray SASE FEL,” Opt. Commun.140, 341–352 (1997), doi:10.1016/S0030-4018(97)00163-6

    work page doi:10.1016/s0030-4018(97)00163-6 1997

  15. [15]

    Demonstration of self-seeding in a hard-X-ray free-electron laser,

    J. Amannet al., “Demonstration of self-seeding in a hard-X-ray free-electron laser,” Nat. Photonics6, 693– 698 (2012), doi:10.1038/nphoton.2012.180

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2012.180 2012

  16. [16]

    Generation of narrow-band X-ray free- electron laser via reflection self-seeding,

    I. Inoueet al., “Generation of narrow-band X-ray free- electron laser via reflection self-seeding,” Nat. Photonics 13, 319–322 (2019), doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0365-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0365-y 2019

  17. [17]

    Cascaded hard X-ray self-seeded free- electron laser at megahertz repetition rate,

    S. Liuet al., “Cascaded hard X-ray self-seeded free- electron laser at megahertz repetition rate,” Nat. Photonics17, 984–991 (2023), doi:10.1038/s41566-023- 01305-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-023- 2023

  18. [18]

    In- vestigations of traveling-wave separators for the Stanford two-mile linear accelerator,

    O. H. Altenmueller, R. R. Larsen, and G. A. Loew, “In- vestigations of traveling-wave separators for the Stanford two-mile linear accelerator,” Rev. Sci. Instrum.35, 438– 442 (1964), doi:10.1063/1.1718840

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1718840 1964

  19. [19]

    Design and appli- cations of R.F. deflecting structures at SLAC,

    G. A. Loew and O. H. Altenmueller, “Design and appli- cations of R.F. deflecting structures at SLAC,” SLAC- PUB-135, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (1965)

    1965

  20. [20]

    Few-femtosecond time-resolved measurements of X-ray free-electron lasers,

    C. Behrens, F.-J. Decker, Y. Ding, V. A. Dolgashev, J. Frisch, Z. Huang, P. Krejcik, H. Loos, A. Lut- man, T. J. Maxwell, J. Turner, J. Wang, M.-H. Wang, J. Welch, and J. Wu, “Few-femtosecond time-resolved measurements of X-ray free-electron lasers,” Nat. Com- mun.5, 3762 (2014), doi:10.1038/ncomms4762

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms4762 2014

  21. [21]

    Novel X-band transverse deflection structure with variable polarization,

    P. Craievichet al., “Novel X-band transverse deflection structure with variable polarization,” Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams23, 112001 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.23.112001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.23.112001 2020

  22. [22]

    Observation of coherent transition radiation,

    U. Happek, A. J. Sievers, and E. B. Blum, “Observation of coherent transition radiation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 7 2962–2965 (1991), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2962

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.2962 1991

  23. [23]

    Measurements of coherent diffraction radiation and its application for bunch length diagnostics in particle accelerators,

    M. Castellano, V. A. Verzilov, L. Catani, A. Cianchi, G. Orlandi, and M. Geitz, “Measurements of coherent diffraction radiation and its application for bunch length diagnostics in particle accelerators,” Phys. Rev. E63, 056501 (2001), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.63.056501

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.63.056501 2001

  24. [24]

    First measurements of the longitudinal bunch profile of a 28.5 GeV beam using coherent Smith-Purcell radia- tion,

    V. Blackmore, G. Doucas, C. Perry, B. Ottewell, M. F. Kimmitt, M. Woods, S. Molloy, and R. Arnold, “First measurements of the longitudinal bunch profile of a 28.5 GeV beam using coherent Smith-Purcell radia- tion,” Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams12, 032803 (2009), doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.12.032803

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevstab.12.032803 2009

  25. [25]

    Single-shot electron-beam bunch length measurements,

    I. Wilkeet al., “Single-shot electron-beam bunch length measurements,” Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 124801 (2002), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.124801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.124801 2002

  26. [26]

    Electro-optic technique with improved time resolution for real-time, nondestructive, single-shot measurements of femtosecond electron bunch profiles,

    G. Berden, W. A. Gillespie, S. P. Jamison, E. A. Seddon, C. J. Bingham, J. R. M. Vaughan, and D. A. Jaroszynski, “Electro-optic technique with improved time resolution for real-time, nondestructive, single-shot measurements of femtosecond electron bunch profiles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 114802 (2004), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.114802

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.114802 2004

  27. [27]

    Temporal profile measurements of rel- ativistic electron bunch based on wakefield genera- tion,

    S. Bettoni, P. Craievich, A. A. Lutman, and M. Pedrozzi, “Temporal profile measurements of rel- ativistic electron bunch based on wakefield genera- tion,” Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams19, 021304 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.19.021304

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.19.021304 2016

  28. [28]

    Use of a corrugated beam pipe as a passive deflector for bunch length measure- ments,

    J. Seok, D. S. Doran, J. B. Rosenzweig, G. Andonian, A. Murokh, and M. Fedurin, “Use of a corrugated beam pipe as a passive deflector for bunch length measure- ments,” Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams21, 022801 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.21.022801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.21.022801 2018

  29. [29]

    Self-synchronized and cost-effective time- resolved measurements at x-ray free-electron lasers with femtosecond resolution,

    P. Dijkstal, A. Malyzhenkov, P. Craievich, E. Fer- rari, R. Ganter, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, P. Jurani´ c, and E. Prat, “Self-synchronized and cost-effective time- resolved measurements at x-ray free-electron lasers with femtosecond resolution,” Phys. Rev. Research4, 013017 (2022), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.013017

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.013017 2022

  30. [30]

    Longitudinal phase space diagnostics with a nonmovable corrugated passive wakefield streaker,

    P. Dijkstal, W. Qin, and S. Tomin, “Longitudinal phase space diagnostics with a nonmovable corrugated passive wakefield streaker,” Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams27, 050702 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.27.050702

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.27.050702 2024

  31. [31]

    First mea- surement of energy diffusion in an electron beam due to quantum fluctuations in the undulator radiation,

    S. Tomin, E. Schneidmiller, and W. Decking, “First mea- surement of energy diffusion in an electron beam due to quantum fluctuations in the undulator radiation,” Sci. Rep.13, 1605 (2023), doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28813-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28813-8 2023

  32. [32]

    TE/TM field solver for particle beam simulations without numerical Cherenkov radiation,

    I. Zagorodnov and T. Weiland, “TE/TM field solver for particle beam simulations without numerical Cherenkov radiation,” Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams8, 042001 (2005), doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.8.042001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevstab.8.042001 2005

  33. [33]

    3ds.com/products/simulia/cst-studio-suite

    CST Studio Suite, Dassault Syst` emes,https://www. 3ds.com/products/simulia/cst-studio-suite

  34. [34]

    Fem- tosecond x-ray pulse temporal characterization in free-electron lasers using a transverse deflector,

    Y. Ding, C. Behrens, P. Emma, J. Frisch, Z. Huang, H. Loos, P. Krejcik, and M.-H. Wang, “Fem- tosecond x-ray pulse temporal characterization in free-electron lasers using a transverse deflector,” Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams14, 120701 (2011), doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.14.120701

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevstab.14.120701 2011

  35. [35]

    Altarelliet al.,XFEL: The European X-Ray Free- Electron Laser – Technical Design Report, DESY 2006- 097, Hamburg, Germany (2006), doi:10.3204/DESY 06- 097

    M. Altarelliet al.,XFEL: The European X-Ray Free- Electron Laser – Technical Design Report, DESY 2006- 097, Hamburg, Germany (2006), doi:10.3204/DESY 06- 097

    work page doi:10.3204/desy 2006

  36. [36]

    OCELOT: A software framework for syn- chrotron light source and FEL studies,

    I. Agapov, G. Geloni, S. Tomin, and I. Zagorod- nov, “OCELOT: A software framework for syn- chrotron light source and FEL studies,” Nucl. In- strum. Methods Phys. Res. A768, 151–156 (2014), doi:10.1016/j.nima.2014.09.057

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2014.09.057 2014

  37. [37]

    Ocelot as a framework for beam dynamics simulations of X-ray sources,

    S. Tomin, I. Agapov, M. Dohlus, and I. Zagorodnov, “Ocelot as a framework for beam dynamics simulations of X-ray sources,” inProceedings of IPAC2017, Copen- hagen, Denmark, 2017, WEPAB031, pp. 2688–2690, doi:10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2017-WEPAB031

    work page doi:10.18429/jacow-ipac2017-wepab031 2017

  38. [38]

    Wakefields of sub-picosecond electron bunches,

    K. L. F. Bane, “Wakefields of sub-picosecond electron bunches,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A22, 3736–3758 (2007), doi:10.1142/S0217751X07037391

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x07037391 2007

  39. [39]

    Accelera- tor beam dynamics at the European X-ray Free Elec- tron Laser,

    I. Zagorodnov, M. Dohlus, and S. Tomin, “Accelera- tor beam dynamics at the European X-ray Free Elec- tron Laser,” Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams22, 024401 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.22.024401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.22.024401 2019

  40. [40]

    Beam arrival stability at the European XFEL,

    M. K. Czwalinna, J. Kral, B. Lautenschlager, J. Mueller, H. Schlarb, S. Schulz, B. Steffen, R. Boll, H. Kirkwood, J. Koliyadu, R. Letrun, J. Liu, F. Pallas, D. E. Rivas, and T. Sato, “Beam arrival stability at the European XFEL,” inProceedings of IPAC2021, Campinas, Brazil, 2021, THXB02, doi:10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-THXB02

    work page doi:10.18429/jacow-ipac2021-thxb02 2021