pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.09192 · v2 · pith:TEFA6UHXnew · submitted 2026-05-09 · 💻 cs.AI

Evidence Over Plans: Online Trajectory Verification for Skill Distillation

Yang Zhou , Zihan Dong , Zhenting Wang , Can Jin , Shiyu Zhao , Bangwei Guo , Difei Gu , Linjun Zhang
show 2 more authors
Mu Zhou Dimitris N. Metaxas
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 22:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI
keywords skill distillationtrajectory verificationagent skillsposterior distillation indexenvironment interactiontask successonline diagnostic
0
0 comments X

The pith

Posterior skill distillation from environment trajectories outperforms human plans and baselines on 86 tasks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that agent skills improve when distilled from real environment interaction data instead of human-written plans or preference logs. It introduces the Posterior Distillation Index to measure how well a skill matches empirical task evidence and develops SPARK to generate and verify trajectories for computing this index. Skills selected with PDI guidance show higher success rates on student models while using far less inference compute than the original teacher models. Tests across 86 runnable tasks confirm consistent gains over both no-skill baselines and human-written skills.

Core claim

The paper establishes that posterior-based skill distillation guided by the Posterior Distillation Index on environment-verified trajectories from SPARK produces efficient and transferable skills that consistently surpass no-skill baselines and human-written skills on student models, with inference costs reduced by up to 1,000 times.

What carries the argument

The Posterior Distillation Index (PDI), a trajectory-level metric that quantifies grounding in task-environment evidence and serves as an online diagnostic signal during skill formation in the SPARK pipeline.

If this is right

  • Distilled skills transfer to student models with inference costs up to 1,000 times lower than teacher models.
  • Online trajectory verification during generation replaces reliance on preference logs for skill quality.
  • Environment-grounded evidence can replace human-written procedural documents while raising task success rates.
  • Full trajectory-level analysis becomes feasible for preserving and using task execution evidence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could extend to other forms of agent training that currently depend on static plans.
  • Similar verification signals might improve reliability when scaling to longer or multi-step tasks.
  • If trajectory bias is detected, the metric could be adjusted by incorporating multiple independent generation paths.

Load-bearing premise

The trajectories produced by SPARK faithfully represent unbiased task-environment evidence rather than being shaped by the generation or verification process itself.

What would settle it

A demonstration that PDI-selected skills perform no better than or worse than human-written skills on a substantial subset of the 86 tasks or in a new environment would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.09192 by Bangwei Guo, Can Jin, Difei Gu, Dimitris N. Metaxas, Linjun Zhang, Mu Zhou, Shiyu Zhao, Yang Zhou, Zhenting Wang, Zihan Dong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: PDI-based SPARK Illustration. 1) Left (Skill Generation): Starting from a task description, a teacher agent (e.g., Claude Opus 4.6) interacts with a Dockerized environment (up to Nmax attempts) and updates an exploration memo from execution feedback. Upon success, the full trajectory trace is distilled into SKILL.md. Upon failure, a PDI-based proxy triggers targeted interventions. 2) Right (Task Constructi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Mean reward r¯ across seven student models under three conditions: no skill (baseline), SPARK-generated skills, and human-written skills. Horizontal dotted lines mark the interaction-free performance of two strong teacher models. GPT-5.4-nano GPT-5.4-mini GPT-5.1-Codex DeepSeek-Chat Claude-Haiku-4.5 GLM-4.5-Air GLM-4.7-FlashX GPT-5.4-nano GPT-5.4-mini GPT-5.1-Codex DeepSeek-Chat Claude-Haiku-4.5 GLM-4.5-Ai… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Three complementary views of skill quality determinants. Left: Compression ratio ρc vs. per-pair ∆r; excessive compression degrades skill effectiveness. Middle: Mean ∆r as a function of the number of exploration attempts; gains are stable for the first three attempts and become volatile thereafter. Right: Mean ∆r per student model for skills distilled from convergent vs. divergent teacher trajectories. 4.2… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Trajectory-level analysis of skill quality using divergence-based PDI (α=0.002). (a) Pass-gain rate by trajectory group across seven student models: high-PDI iterative trajectories consistently outperform both interaction-free and low-PDI iterative skills. (b) PDI vs. per-pair ∆r (ρ=+0.364, p<10−6 ). (c) Memo ossification vs. gap relative to human-written skills (ρ=−0.277, p<10−3 ): trajectories that repea… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spearman rank correlation between trajectory-level features (columns) and student skill gain ∆rm,t (rows). Each row corresponds to a student model; the bottom row pools all (task, model) pairs. Significance: ∗ p < .05, ∗∗ p < .01, ∗ ∗ ∗ p < .001. • First-retry reward gain: ∆r (1) = r2 − r1. • Strategy pivot count: PK k=2 1[J(strategyk−1 ,strategyk ) < 0.15], where strategyk is the “Next Strategy” section o… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Two case studies of online PDI-guided control, comparing PDI-enabled runs against observe-only controls on 3d-scan-calc and manufacturing-codebook-normalization. Each panel plots execution grounding (ϕexec), plan copying (ϕplan), memo ossification (ϕoss), and the warmup-weighted proxy-PDI used for intervention decisions. Vertical dashed lines mark soft and strong triggers. D External Transfer Case Study: l… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Sensitivity of PDI to the smoothing parameter α. (a) Spearman ρ between PDI and three outcome measures; circled points are significant at p<0.05. (b) Corresponding p-values on a log scale; the red dashed line marks p=0.05. The shaded band highlights the optimal region α ∈ [5×10−4 , 5×10−3 ]. Directional structure. We sweep all weight combinations (we, wp, wo) with we > 0 (preserving the sign convention tha… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Agent skills can remarkably improve task success rates by using human-written procedural documents, but their quality is difficult to assess without environment-grounded verification. Existing skill generation methods heavily rely on preference logs rather than direct environment interaction, often yielding negligible or even degraded gains. We identify that it is a fundamental timing bottleneck: robust skills should be posterior-based, distilled from empirical environment interaction rather than prior plans. In this study, we introduce the Posterior Distillation Index (PDI), a trajectory-level metric that quantifies how well a distilled skill is grounded in the task-environment evidence. To operationalize PDI, we present SPARK (Structured Pipelines for Autonomous Runnable tasKs and sKill generation) for preserving task execution evidence towards full trajectory-level analysis. SPARK generates environment-verified trajectories used to compute PDI, and it applies PDI as an online diagnostic and intervention signal to ensure posterior skill formation. Across 86 runnable tasks, SPARK-generated skills consistently surpass no-skill baselines and outperform human-written skills on student models (inference cost up to 1,000x cheaper than teacher models). These findings show that PDI-guided distillation produces efficient and transferable skills grounded in the task-environment interaction. We release our code at https://github.com/EtaYang10th/spark-skills .

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that robust agent skills require posterior distillation from empirical task-environment trajectories rather than prior plans or preference logs. It introduces the Posterior Distillation Index (PDI) as a trajectory-level metric of grounding quality and SPARK, a pipeline that generates environment-verified trajectories, computes PDI, and applies PDI online as a diagnostic and intervention signal. On 86 runnable tasks, SPARK-distilled skills outperform no-skill baselines and human-written skills when transferred to student models whose inference cost is up to 1,000× lower than the teacher.

Significance. If the central claim holds without circularity between the intervention policy and the evidence metric, the work would supply a concrete, falsifiable alternative to plan-based skill generation and demonstrate measurable gains in transfer and efficiency across a non-trivial task suite.

major comments (2)
  1. [SPARK description (abstract and § on trajectory generation)] The abstract states that SPARK 'applies PDI as an online diagnostic and intervention signal to ensure posterior skill formation.' This creates a potential circularity: the same metric used to score grounding also shapes the trajectories that supply the evidence, so it is unclear whether the reported gains reflect independent environment interaction or the intervention policy itself.
  2. [Experimental results and PDI definition] No derivation of PDI, no explicit definition of the trajectory-level computation, and no experimental protocol (including how the 86 tasks were selected, how human-written skills were obtained, or whether error bars or ablations are reported) appear in the provided text, rendering the central empirical claim unverifiable from the manuscript as presented.
minor comments (1)
  1. The GitHub link for code release is noted; if the repository contains the full experimental harness and trajectory data, this would directly address reproducibility concerns.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to improve clarity and completeness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [SPARK description (abstract and § on trajectory generation)] The abstract states that SPARK 'applies PDI as an online diagnostic and intervention signal to ensure posterior skill formation.' This creates a potential circularity: the same metric used to score grounding also shapes the trajectories that supply the evidence, so it is unclear whether the reported gains reflect independent environment interaction or the intervention policy itself.

    Authors: We thank the referee for identifying this potential concern. Trajectory generation in SPARK proceeds via direct, unguided environment interaction to produce verifiable execution traces. PDI is computed afterward as a post-generation metric on those traces. Its online use functions solely as a diagnostic filter during the subsequent distillation step, selecting or weighting already-collected evidence rather than modifying the environment interactions or the initial trajectory collection process. The reported performance gains therefore derive from the environment-verified evidence itself. We will add an explicit methods subsection and accompanying diagram that separates the three stages (trajectory generation, PDI computation, and distillation intervention) to eliminate any ambiguity on this point. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Experimental results and PDI definition] No derivation of PDI, no explicit definition of the trajectory-level computation, and no experimental protocol (including how the 86 tasks were selected, how human-written skills were obtained, or whether error bars or ablations are reported) appear in the provided text, rendering the central empirical claim unverifiable from the manuscript as presented.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's observation that the excerpt supplied for review did not contain these elements in sufficient detail. The complete manuscript includes the PDI derivation and trajectory-level formula in Section 3, the task-selection protocol and human-skill sourcing procedure in Section 4.1, and error bars plus ablation results in Section 5. We will expand and foreground these sections in the revision so that the empirical claims are fully verifiable from the main text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The provided abstract and description introduce PDI as a metric and SPARK as a pipeline that generates trajectories and applies PDI for intervention, but contain no equations, fitting procedures, or self-citations that reduce any central claim to its inputs by construction. The empirical results across 86 tasks are presented as external validation rather than a mathematical equivalence or renamed fit. The process description does not exhibit self-definitional reduction or fitted-input prediction without additional full-text details showing explicit equivalence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no identifiable free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claim rests on the unstated assumption that environment trajectories can be generated and scored without circular dependence on the skill being evaluated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5783 in / 1029 out tokens · 19360 ms · 2026-06-30T22:47:49.964030+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    EvoSkill: Automated Skill Discovery for Multi-Agent Systems

    Salaheddin Alzubi, Noah Provenzano, Jaydon Bingham, Weiyuan Chen, and Tu Vu. EvoSkill: Automated skill discovery for multi-agent systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.02766, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Large language models as tool makers

    Tianle Cai, Xuezhi Wang, Tengyu Ma, Xinyun Chen, and Denny Zhou. Large language models as tool makers. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2024

    2024

  3. [3]

    SkillCraft: Can LLM agents learn to use tools skillfully? arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.00718, 2026

    Shiqi Chen, Jingze Gai, Ruochen Zhou, Jinghan Zhang, Tongyao Zhu, Junlong Li, Kangrui Wang, Zihan Wang, Zhengyu Chen, Klara Kaleb, Ning Miao, Siyang Gao, Cong Lu, Manling Li, Junxian He, and Yee Whye Teh. SkillCraft: Can LLM agents learn to use tools skillfully? arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.00718, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    CUA- Skill: Develop skills for computer using agent.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21123, 2026

    Tianyi Chen, Yinheng Li, Michael Solodko, Sen Wang, Nan Jiang, Tingyuan Cui, Junheng Hao, Jongwoo Ko, Sara Abdali, Leon Xu, Suzhen Zheng, Hao Fan, Pashmina Cameron, Justin Wagle, and Kazuhito Koishida. CUA-Skill: Develop skills for computer using agent.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21123, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    Born again neural networks

    Tommaso Furlanello, Zachary Lipton, Michael Tschannen, Laurent Itti, and Anima Anandkumar. Born again neural networks. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 1607–1616. PMLR, 2018

    2018

  6. [6]

    Distilling the knowledge in a neural network

    Geoffrey Hinton, Oriol Vinyals, and Jeff Dean. Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. In NIPS Deep Learning and Representation Learning Workshop, 2015

    2015

  7. [7]

    Learning from teaching regularization: Generalizable correlations should be easy to imitate.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:966–994, 2024

    Can Jin, Tong Che, Hongwu Peng, Yiyuan Li, Dimitris N Metaxas, and Marco Pavone. Learning from teaching regularization: Generalizable correlations should be easy to imitate.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:966–994, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    SkillsBench: Benchmarking How Well Agent Skills Work Across Diverse Tasks

    Xiangyi Li, Wenbo Chen, Yimin Liu, Shenghan Zheng, Xiaokun Chen, Yifeng He, Yubo Li, Bingran You, Haotian Shen, Jiankai Sun, et al. SkillsBench: Benchmarking how well agent skills work across diverse tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.12670, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    SkillNet: Create, evaluate, and connect AI skills.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.04448, 2026

    Yuan Liang, Ruobin Zhong, Haoming Xu, Chen Jiang, Yi Zhong, Runnan Fang, Jia-Chen Gu, Shumin Deng, Yunzhi Yao, Mengru Wang, et al. SkillNet: Create, evaluate, and connect AI skills.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.04448, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  10. [10]

    How Well Do Agentic Skills Work in the Wild: Benchmarking LLM Skill Usage in Realistic Settings

    Yujian Liu, Jiabao Ji, Li An, Tommi Jaakkola, Yang Zhang, and Shiyu Chang. How well do agentic skills work in the wild: Benchmarking LLM skill usage in realistic settings.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.04323, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  11. [11]

    SKILL0: In-Context Agentic Reinforcement Learning for Skill Internalization

    Zhengxi Lu, Zhiyuan Yao, Jinyang Wu, Chengcheng Han, Qi Gu, Xunliang Cai, Weiming Lu, Jun Xiao, Yueting Zhuang, and Yongliang Shen. SKILL0: In-context agentic reinforcement learning for skill internalization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.02268, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    Trace2Skill: Distill Trajectory-Local Lessons into Transferable Agent Skills

    Jingwei Ni, Yihao Liu, Xinpeng Liu, Yutao Sun, Mengyu Zhou, Pengyu Cheng, Dexin Wang, Erchao Zhao, Xiaoxi Jiang, and Guanjun Jiang. Trace2Skill: Distill trajectory-local lessons into transferable agent skills.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.25158, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    Fung, Yujia Qin, Zhiyuan Liu, and Heng Ji

    Cheng Qian, Chi Han, Yi R. Fung, Yujia Qin, Zhiyuan Liu, and Heng Ji. CREATOR: Tool creation for disentangling abstract and concrete reasoning of large language models. InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, 2023

    2023

  14. [14]

    ToolLLM: Facilitating large language models to master 16000+ real-world APIs

    Yujia Qin, Shihao Liang, Yining Ye, Kunlun Zhu, Lan Yan, Yaxi Lu, Yankai Lin, Xin Cong, Xiangru Tang, Bill Qian, et al. ToolLLM: Facilitating large language models to master 16000+ real-world APIs. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2024. 10

    2024

  15. [15]

    AutoRefine: From trajectories to reusable expertise for continual LLM agent refinement.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.22758, 2026

    Libin Qiu, Zhirong Gao, Junfu Chen, Yuhang Ye, Weizhi Huang, Xiaobo Xue, Wenkai Qiu, and Shuo Tang. AutoRefine: From trajectories to reusable expertise for continual LLM agent refinement.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.22758, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools

    Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu, Maria Lomeli, Eric Hambro, Luke Zettlemoyer, Nicola Cancedda, and Thomas Scialom. Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2023

    2023

  17. [17]

    Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning

    Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Edward Berman, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2023

    2023

  18. [18]

    ALFWorld: Aligning text and embodied environments for interactive learning

    Mohit Shridhar, Xingdi Yuan, Marc-Alexandre Côté, Yonatan Bisk, Adam Trischler, and Matthew Hausknecht. ALFWorld: Aligning text and embodied environments for interactive learning. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2021

    2021

  19. [19]

    Trial and error: Exploration-based trajectory optimization for LLM agents

    Yifan Song, Da Yin, Xiang Yue, Jie Huang, Sujian Li, and Bill Yuchen Lin. Trial and error: Exploration-based trajectory optimization for LLM agents. InProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2024

    2024

  20. [20]

    SkillX: Automatically Constructing Skill Knowledge Bases for Agents

    Chenxi Wang, Zhuoyun Yu, Xin Xie, Wuguannan Yao, Runnan Fang, et al. SkillX: Auto- matically constructing skill knowledge bases for agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.04804, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models

    Guanzhi Wang, Yuqi Xie, Yunfan Jiang, Ajay Mandlekar, Chaowei Xiao, Yuke Zhu, Linxi Fan, and Anima Anandkumar. V oyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16291, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    SkillRL: Evolving Agents via Recursive Skill-Augmented Reinforcement Learning

    Peng Xia, Jianwen Chen, Hanyang Wang, Jiaqi Liu, Kaide Zeng, Yu Wang, Siwei Han, Yiyang Zhou, Xujiang Zhao, Haifeng Chen, Zeyu Zheng, Cihang Xie, and Huaxiu Yao. SkillRL: Evolving agents via recursive skill-augmented reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.08234, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  23. [23]

    AgentTrek: Agent trajectory synthesis via guiding replay with web tutorials

    Yiheng Xu, Dunjie Lu, Zhennan Shen, Junli Wang, Zekun Wang, Yuchen Mao, Caiming Xiong, and Tao Yu. AgentTrek: Agent trajectory synthesis via guiding replay with web tutorials. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2025

    2025

  24. [24]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.01145

    Yutao Yang, Junsong Li, Qianjun Pan, Bihao Zhan, Yuxuan Cai, Lin Du, Jie Zhou, Kai Chen, Qin Chen, Xin Li, Bo Zhang, and Liang He. AutoSkill: Experience-driven lifelong learning via skill self-evolution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.01145, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    ReAct: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models

    Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. ReAct: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023

    2023

  26. [26]

    Online Experiential Learning for Language Models

    Tianzhu Ye, Li Dong, Qingxiu Dong, Xun Wu, Shaohan Huang, and Furu Wei. Online experiential learning for language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.16856, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    ExpeL: LLM agents are experiential learners

    Andrew Zhao, Daniel Huang, Quentin Xu, Matthieu Lin, Yong-Jin Liu, and Gao Huang. ExpeL: LLM agents are experiential learners. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2024

    2024

  28. [28]

    SkillRouter: Skill Routing for

    Yanzhao Zheng, Zhentao Zhang, Chao Ma, Yuanqiang Yu, Jihuai Zhu, et al. SkillRouter: Skill routing for LLM agents at scale.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.22455, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Mˆ 3-bench: Multi-modal, multi-hop, multi-threaded tool-using mllm agent benchmark.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.17729, 2025

    Yang Zhou, Mingyu Zhao, Zhenting Wang, Difei Gu, Bangwei Guo, Ruosong Ye, Ligong Han, Can Jin, and Dimitris N Metaxas. Mˆ 3-bench: Multi-modal, multi-hop, multi-threaded tool-using mllm agent benchmark.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.17729, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Next Strategy

    Yang Zhou, Shiyu Zhao, Yuxiao Chen, Zhenting Wang, Can Jin, and Dimitris N Metaxas. Led: Llm enhanced open-vocabulary object detection without human curated data generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.13794, 2025. 11 Appendix Content APositioning Against Prior Skill-Centric Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...

    work page arXiv 2025