pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26400 · v2 · pith:SLV6QXZQnew · submitted 2026-04-29 · 💻 cs.SC · cs.LO

Pseudo-Complex Quantifier Elimination

Nicolas Faro{\ss} , Thomas Sturm This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 08:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SC cs.LO
keywords quantifier eliminationcomplex numbersreal closed fieldssymbolic computationdecision proceduresordered rings
0
0 comments X

The pith

A quantifier elimination procedure for the complex numbers reduces problems to real quantifier elimination and reinterprets the output.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a method for eliminating quantifiers from logical formulas whose variables range over the complex numbers. The language includes the imaginary unit along with operations that extract real and imaginary parts and form conjugates. The central technique translates each such problem into an equivalent problem over the real numbers, solves it with existing real quantifier elimination software, and then maps the resulting formula back into the complex language by a direct reinterpretation step. If the reinterpretation step is faithful, the procedure yields a quantifier-free formula that is logically equivalent over the complexes to the original input.

Core claim

The framework performs quantifier elimination for the complex numbers by first mapping each input formula into the language of ordered rings over the reals, applying a real quantifier elimination algorithm, and then applying a heuristic reinterpretation that replaces the real variables and operations with their complex counterparts including the imaginary unit, real-part, imaginary-part, and conjugate symbols.

What carries the argument

Reduction of complex formulas to real quantifier elimination followed by heuristic reinterpretation of the resulting real formula inside the complex language.

If this is right

  • Existing real quantifier elimination implementations become directly usable for complex formulas that mention the imaginary unit and conjugates.
  • Decision procedures for statements in the language of ordered rings extended by imaginary-unit symbols become available without building a separate complex solver from scratch.
  • Computational examples can be run immediately in the prototype implementation inside the Python system Logic1.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same reduction-plus-reinterpretation pattern might be tested on other field extensions or on ordered fields with additional algebraic structure.
  • If the reinterpretation step can be proved correct rather than merely heuristic, the method would supply a fully rigorous decision procedure for the extended complex language.

Load-bearing premise

The heuristic reinterpretation of the real quantifier elimination result always produces a formula that is logically equivalent over the complexes to the original input.

What would settle it

A concrete quantified formula over the complexes for which the reinterpreted output formula evaluates to a different truth value than the original formula under the standard interpretation of the complex numbers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26400 by Nicolas Faro{\ss}, Thomas Sturm.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Circuit diagram of a passive RC high-pass filter Example 10 (Gain of passive RC high-pass filter) view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Circuit diagram of an active RC filter; see [18, Example 1] normal form used time (s) 3 Cartesian coordinates conjugate 0.04 4 Roots of unity, φ1 conjugate 0.03 4 Roots of unity, φ2 conjugate 1.23 5 Counterexample for geometry provers conjugate 0.07 6 Orthogonality (n = 3) conjugate 0.2 7 Cauchy-Schwarz inequality (n = 4) conjugate 24.57 8 Self-adjoint matrices, φ1 conjugate 1.28 8 Self-adjoint matrices, φ… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We describe the design of a quantifier elimination framework for the complex numbers in the language of ordered rings supplemented with symbols for the imaginary unit, real parts, imaginary parts, and conjugates. Technically, we use a reduction to real quantifier elimination followed by a heuristic reinterpretation of the results within our complex framework. We present computational examples using a prototypical implementation of our approach in our Python-based open-source system Logic1.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper describes the design of a quantifier elimination framework for the complex numbers in the language of ordered rings augmented with symbols for the imaginary unit i, real parts Re, imaginary parts Im, and conjugates. The approach reduces complex QE to real quantifier elimination followed by a heuristic reinterpretation of the results back into the complex language, and demonstrates the method via a prototypical open-source implementation in the Python-based Logic1 system together with computational examples.

Significance. If the heuristic reinterpretation step can be shown to preserve logical equivalence, the framework would provide a practical reduction-based method for complex QE that leverages existing real QE tools without requiring a fully independent decision procedure. The open-source prototypical implementation supports reproducibility and allows direct testing of the examples. However, the heuristic nature of the core step limits the result's theoretical weight absent a soundness argument.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (technical approach paragraph): The central claim depends on reducing to real QE and then applying a heuristic reinterpretation to recover results in the language with i, Re, Im, and conj; no details, algorithm, or argument establishing that this reinterpretation preserves logical equivalence are supplied, leaving the soundness of the entire framework unverified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and the recommendation for major revision. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (technical approach paragraph): The central claim depends on reducing to real QE and then applying a heuristic reinterpretation to recover results in the language with i, Re, Im, and conj; no details, algorithm, or argument establishing that this reinterpretation preserves logical equivalence are supplied, leaving the soundness of the entire framework unverified.

    Authors: The manuscript describes the core step explicitly as a 'heuristic reinterpretation' (abstract and introduction), without claiming or providing a general argument that it preserves logical equivalence. The contribution is positioned as a practical reduction to existing real QE tools, supported by a prototypical open-source implementation and computational examples rather than a complete decision procedure. We agree that this leaves the framework without a verified soundness guarantee in the theoretical sense noted by the referee. We will revise the abstract to state the heuristic limitation more explicitly and to avoid any implication of guaranteed equivalence. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: reduction to external real QE plus explicit heuristic

full rationale

The paper's central technical step is a reduction to existing real quantifier elimination followed by a heuristic reinterpretation step that is explicitly labeled as such in the abstract. No self-definitional equations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The derivation chain relies on standard real QE (an independent external method) and does not reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction. This is the normal case of a design paper presenting a new framework without circular reasoning.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach assumes standard real quantifier elimination exists and can be applied after reduction; the complex language extension is treated as a domain assumption. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Quantifier elimination procedures exist for the theory of real ordered rings
    The method explicitly reduces complex problems to real quantifier elimination.
  • domain assumption The language of ordered rings extended with symbols for imaginary unit, real/imaginary parts, and conjugates is semantically well-defined
    The framework is defined in this supplemented language.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5577 in / 1272 out tokens · 39120 ms · 2026-07-01T08:54:11.717226+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    On the theories of triangular sets

    Philippe Aubry, Daniel Lazard, and Marc Moreno Maza. On the theories of triangular sets. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 28 0 (1--2): 0 105--124, 1999. doi:10.1006/jsco.1999.0269

    work page doi:10.1006/jsco.1999.0269 1999

  2. [2]

    On the combinatorial and algebraic complexity of quantifier elimination

    Saugata Basu, Richard Pollack, and Marie-Fran c oise Roy. On the combinatorial and algebraic complexity of quantifier elimination. Journal of the ACM, 43 0 (6): 0 1002--1045, October 1996. doi:10.1145/235809.235813

    work page doi:10.1145/235809.235813 1996

  3. [3]

    Brown and James H

    Christopher W. Brown and James H. Davenport. The complexity of quantifier elimination and cylindrical algebraic decomposition. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation (ISSAC '07), pages 54--60. ACM, 2007. doi:10.1145/1277548.1277557

    work page doi:10.1145/1277548.1277557 2007

  4. [4]

    Algorithms for computing triangular decompositions of polynomial systems

    Changbo Chen and Marc Moreno Maza. Algorithms for computing triangular decompositions of polynomial systems. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 47 0 (6): 0 610--642, 2012. doi:10.1016/j.jsc.2011.12.023

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jsc.2011.12.023 2012

  5. [5]

    On the theory of local rings

    Claude Chevalley. On the theory of local rings. Annals of Mathematics, 44 0 (4): 0 690--708, 1943. doi:10.2307/1969105

    work page doi:10.2307/1969105 1943

  6. [6]

    A. L. Chistov and D. Yu. Grigor'ev. Complexity of quantifier elimination in the theory of algebraically closed fields. In M. P. Chytil and V. Koubek, editors, Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 1984, volume 176 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 17--31. Springer, 1984. ISBN 978-3-540-38929-3. doi:10.1007/BFb0030287

    work page doi:10.1007/bfb0030287 1984

  7. [7]

    A. L. Chistov and D. Yu. Grigor'ev. Subexponential-time solving systems of algebraic equations. Leningrad Mathematical Journal, 2 0 (6), 1991. Parts I and II. English translation of Zap. Nauchn. Sem. LOMI 137 (1984)

    1991

  8. [8]

    Mechanical Geometry Theorem Proving, volume 41 of Mathematics and Its Applications

    Shang-Ching Chou. Mechanical Geometry Theorem Proving, volume 41 of Mathematics and Its Applications. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, 1988. ISBN 978-90-277-2650-6

    1988

  9. [9]

    George E. Collins. Quantifier elimination for real closed fields by cylindrical algebraic decomposition. In H. Brakhage, editor, Automata Theory and Formal Languages. 2nd GI Conference, volume 33 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 134--183. Springer, 1975. doi:10.1007/3-540-07407-4_17

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-07407-4_17 1975

  10. [10]

    Collins and Hoon Hong

    George E. Collins and Hoon Hong. Partial cylindrical algebraic decomposition for quantifier elimination. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 12 0 (3): 0 299--328, September 1991. doi:10.1016/S0747-7171(08)80152-6

    work page doi:10.1016/s0747-7171(08)80152-6 1991

  11. [11]

    Davenport and Joos Heintz

    James H. Davenport and Joos Heintz. Real quantifier elimination is doubly exponential. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 5 0 (1--2): 0 29--35, February--April 1988. doi:10.1016/S0747-7171(88)80004-X

    work page doi:10.1016/s0747-7171(88)80004-x 1988

  12. [12]

    Final report on mathematical procedures for decision problems

    Martin Davis. Final report on mathematical procedures for decision problems. Technical report, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ, October 1954

    1954

  13. [13]

    Redlog: Computer algebra meets computer logic

    Andreas Dolzmann and Thomas Sturm. Redlog: Computer algebra meets computer logic. ACM SIGSAM Bulletin, 31 0 (2): 0 2--9, June 1997 a . doi:10.1145/261320.261324

    work page doi:10.1145/261320.261324 1997

  14. [14]

    Simplification of quantifier-free formulae over ordered fields

    Andreas Dolzmann and Thomas Sturm. Simplification of quantifier-free formulae over ordered fields. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 24 0 (2): 0 209--232, 1997 b . doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jsco.1997.0123

    work page doi:10.1006/jsco.1997.0123 1997

  15. [15]

    A new approach for automatic theorem proving in real geometry

    Andreas Dolzmann, Thomas Sturm, and Volker Weispfenning. A new approach for automatic theorem proving in real geometry. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 21 0 (3): 0 357--380, December 1998. doi:10.1023/A:1006031329384

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1006031329384 1998

  16. [16]

    Real quantifier elimination in practice

    Andreas Dolzmann, Thomas Sturm, and Volker Weispfenning. Real quantifier elimination in practice. In B. H. Matzat, G.-M. Greuel, and G. Hiss, editors, Algorithmic Algebra and Number Theory, pages 221--247. Springer, 1999. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-59932-3_11

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-59932-3_11 1999

  17. [17]

    Harold N. Gabow. Data structures for weighted matching and extensions to b-matching and f-factors. ACM Transactions on Algorithms, 14 0 (3): 0 1--80, 2018. doi:10.1145/3183369

    work page doi:10.1145/3183369 2018

  18. [18]

    Gielen, P

    G. Gielen, P. Wambacq, and W.M. Sansen. Symbolic analysis methods and applications for analog circuits: a tutorial overview. Proceedings of the IEEE, 82 0 (2): 0 287--304, 1994. doi:10.1109/5.265355

    work page doi:10.1109/5.265355 1994

  19. [19]

    D. Yu. Grigoriev. Complexity of deciding T arski algebra. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 5 0 (1--2): 0 65--108, February--April 1988. doi:10.1016/S0747-7171(88)80006-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s0747-7171(88)80006-3 1988

  20. [20]

    Definability and fast quantifier elimination in algebraically closed fields

    Joos Heintz. Definability and fast quantifier elimination in algebraically closed fields. Theoretical Computer Science, 24 0 (3): 0 239--277, August 1983. doi:10.1016/0304-3975(83)90002-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0304-3975(83)90002-6 1983

  21. [21]

    Kennedy and Parastoo Sadeghi

    Rodney A. Kennedy and Parastoo Sadeghi. Hilbert Space Methods in Signal Processing. Cambridge University Press, 2013. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511844515

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511844515 2013

  22. [22]

    New Concepts for Real Quantifier Elimination by Virtual Substitution

    Marek Ko s ta. New Concepts for Real Quantifier Elimination by Virtual Substitution. Doctoral dissertation, Saarland University, Germany, December 2016

    2016

  23. [23]

    Faster one block quantifier elimination for regular polynomial systems of equations

    Huu Phuoc Le and Mohab Safey El Din. Faster one block quantifier elimination for regular polynomial systems of equations. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation (ISSAC '21), pages 265--272. ACM, 2021. doi:10.1145/3452143.3465546

    work page doi:10.1145/3452143.3465546 2021

  24. [24]

    Nilsson and Susan Riedel

    James W. Nilsson and Susan Riedel. Electric Circuits. Pearson Education, 2014. ISBN 9780133594812

    2014

  25. [25]

    Oppenheim, Alan S

    Alan V. Oppenheim, Alan S. Willsky, and S. Hamid Nawab. Signals & Systems. Prentice-Hall signal processing series. Prentice Hall, 1997. ISBN 9780138147570

    1997

  26. [26]

    Parametric toricity of steady state varieties of reaction networks

    Hamid Rahkooy and Thomas Sturm. Parametric toricity of steady state varieties of reaction networks. In Computer Algebra in Scientific Computing (CASC 2021), volume 12865 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 314--333. Springer, 2021. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85165-1_18

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85165-1_18 2021

  27. [27]

    On the computational complexity and geometry of the first-order theory of the reals

    James Renegar. On the computational complexity and geometry of the first-order theory of the reals. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 13 0 (3): 0 255--352, March 1992. doi:10.1016/S0747-7171(10)80003-3. Parts I--III

    work page doi:10.1016/s0747-7171(10)80003-3 1992

  28. [28]

    Combinatorial Optimization, volume 24 of Algorithms and Combinatorics

    Alexander Schrijver. Combinatorial Optimization, volume 24 of Algorithms and Combinatorics. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002. ISBN 9783540443896

    2002

  29. [29]

    Bernhard Schölkopf and Alexander J. Smola. Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond. The MIT Press, 2001. doi:10.7551/mitpress/4175.001.0001

    work page doi:10.7551/mitpress/4175.001.0001 2001

  30. [30]

    A new decision method for elementary algebra

    Abraham Seidenberg. A new decision method for elementary algebra. Annals of Mathematics, 60 0 (2): 0 365--374, 1954. doi:10.2307/1969640

    work page doi:10.2307/1969640 1954

  31. [31]

    R. Shankar. Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Springer New York, 1994. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0576-8

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0576-8 1994

  32. [32]

    A survey of some methods for real quantifier elimination, decision, and satisfiability and their applications

    Thomas Sturm. A survey of some methods for real quantifier elimination, decision, and satisfiability and their applications. Mathematics in Computer Science, 11 0 (3--4): 0 483--502, December 2017. doi:10.1007/s11786-017-0319-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s11786-017-0319-z 2017

  33. [33]

    \"U ber einige fundamentale B egriffe der M etamathematik

    Alfred Tarski. \"U ber einige fundamentale B egriffe der M etamathematik. Comptes Rendus des S \'e ances de la Soci \'e des Sciences et des Lettres de Varsovie, Classe III , 23: 0 22--29, 1930

    1930

  34. [34]

    Contributions to the theory of models

    Alfred Tarski. Contributions to the theory of models. I . Indagationes Mathematicae, 57: 0 572--581, 1954. doi:10.1016/S1385-7258(54)50074-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s1385-7258(54)50074-0 1954

  35. [35]

    A decision method for elementary algebra and geometry

    Alfred Tarski. A decision method for elementary algebra and geometry. P repared for publication by J . C . C . M c K insey. RAND Report R109, August 1, 1948, Revised May 1951, Second Edition, RAND, Santa Monica, CA, 1957

    1948

  36. [36]

    The complexity of linear problems in fields

    Volker Weispfenning. The complexity of linear problems in fields. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 5 0 (1--2): 0 3--27, February--April 1988. doi:10.1016/S0747-7171(88)80003-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0747-7171(88)80003-8 1988

  37. [37]

    Comprehensive G r \"o bner bases

    Volker Weispfenning. Comprehensive G r \"o bner bases. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 14 0 (1): 0 1--29, July 1992. doi:10.1016/0747-7171(92)90023-W

    work page doi:10.1016/0747-7171(92)90023-w 1992

  38. [38]

    Quantifier elimination for real algebra---the quadratic case and beyond

    Volker Weispfenning. Quantifier elimination for real algebra---the quadratic case and beyond. Applicable Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computing, 8 0 (2): 0 85--101, January 1997. doi:10.1007/s002000050055

    work page doi:10.1007/s002000050055 1997

  39. [39]

    A new approach to quantifier elimination for real algebra

    Volker Weispfenning. A new approach to quantifier elimination for real algebra. In B. F. Caviness and J. R. Johnson, editors, Quantifier Elimination and Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition, Texts and Monographs in Symbolic Computation, pages 376--392. Springer, 1998. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-9459-1_20

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-9459-1_20 1998