Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 96 references

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.

T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

String theory branes can be described equivalently as open-string endpoints, BPS supergravity backgrounds, and dynamical objects carrying gauge-invariant actions.

2026-05-10 04:40 UTC

load-bearing objection Review of branes with three perspectives but no new results.

arxiv 2604.18488 v1 submitted 2026-04-20 hep-th

Branes

Edvard T. Musaev This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords branesstring theorysupergravityBPS solutionsopen stringsgauge-invariant actionsbrane bound statesMyers effect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The review organizes branes of string theory around three perspectives that together capture their properties and interactions. From the open-string viewpoint they appear as endpoints; from supergravity they are BPS backgrounds; from the worldvolume they are dynamical objects with gauge-invariant actions. These three pictures are then used to analyze concrete interaction phenomena including bound states, the Hanany-Witten effect, the Myers effect, and supertubes. A reader gains a unified language for discussing branes that connects perturbative string theory with non-perturbative gravitational solutions.

Core claim

Branes admit consistent descriptions from three distinct vantage points: as the endpoints of open strings, as BPS solutions of the supergravity equations, and as dynamical objects equipped with gauge-invariant worldvolume actions. These viewpoints together permit systematic treatment of brane bound states, the Hanany-Witten transition, the Myers dielectric effect, and supertube configurations.

What carries the argument

The three equivalent perspectives on branes (open-string endpoints, BPS supergravity backgrounds, gauge-invariant dynamical actions) that are shown to be interchangeable and jointly sufficient to derive interaction effects.

Load-bearing premise

The reader already knows the basic definitions of open strings and the supergravity limit of string theory.

What would settle it

A concrete brane configuration whose tension or charge spectrum cannot be reproduced simultaneously from the open-string endpoint picture, the BPS supergravity solution, and a gauge-invariant worldvolume action.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. This review describes branes in string theory from three perspectives—as endpoints of open strings, as BPS supergravity backgrounds, and as dynamical objects with gauge-invariant world-volume actions—then surveys interaction phenomena including bound states, the Hanany-Witten effect, the Myers effect, and supertubes. The material is drawn from a lecture course at MIPT and presents no new derivations or quantitative claims.

Significance. As an expository synthesis of established results, the review provides a compact pedagogical overview that consolidates three complementary viewpoints on branes together with their known interaction effects. Such multi-perspective summaries can aid students and researchers who already possess basic string-theory background; the absence of novel theorems or parameter-free derivations is appropriate for the lecture-note format.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and introduction could explicitly state the target audience level (e.g., familiarity with open-string quantization and supergravity solutions) to help readers decide whether the review is self-contained for them.
  2. A short table or diagram comparing the three perspectives (open-string endpoints, BPS supergravity, world-volume actions) would improve readability and highlight their interrelations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive recommendation to accept. The referee's summary correctly identifies the review's scope as an expository synthesis of established results on branes from multiple perspectives, drawn from the MIPT lecture course.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: expository review of established results

full rationale

This is a lecture-based review summarizing three standard perspectives on branes (open-string endpoints, BPS supergravity solutions, and world-volume actions) plus known interaction phenomena such as bound states and the Hanany-Witten effect. No new theorems, derivations, or quantitative predictions are advanced whose validity rests on the paper's own equations or self-citations. All material is presented as established prior work, with the abstract explicitly framing the content as a summary of a course rather than an original derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As this is a review paper summarizing established concepts in string theory, it does not introduce new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond those in the prior literature it covers.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5337 in / 898 out tokens · 32099 ms · 2026-05-10T04:40:30.175904+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this review branes of string theory are described from three different perspectives: as endpoints of open string, as supergravity backgrounds with BPS properties, as dynamical objects with gauge invariant actions. Based on these descriptions various effects of brane interactions are reviewed: brane bound states, Hanany--Witten and Myers effects, supertubes. The review is based on the lecture course given at MIPT.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18488 by Edvard T. Musaev.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the open-closed string duality. For details see the text. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic depiction of the Hanany–Witten effect: when the D4-brane passes through [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic spacetime picture of a magnetic monopole moving past an electric charge. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p056_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic illustration of the Myers effect: a stack of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic depiction of the D2 supertube effect. The world-volume electric field, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p064_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 96 canonical work pages · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Exotic Branes in String Theory

    J. de Boer and M. Shigemori, “Exotic Branes in String Theory,”Phys. Rept.532(2013) 65–118,arXiv:1209.6056 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  2. [2]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J. M. Maldacena, “The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252,arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten, “Anti de Sitter space and holography,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291,arXiv:hep-th/9802150

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Gauge Theory Correlators from Non-Critical String Theory

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,”Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105–114,arXiv:hep-th/9802109

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    Ammon and J

    M. Ammon and J. Erdmenger,Gauge/gravity duality: Foundations and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 4, 2015

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Large N Field Theories, String Theory and Gravity

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, “Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,”Phys. Rept.323(2000) 183–386, arXiv:hep-th/9905111

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  7. [7]

    Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview

    N. Beisertet al., “Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview,”Lett. Math. Phys. 99(2012) 3–32,arXiv:1012.3982 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Flux compactifications in string theory: a comprehensive review

    M. Grana, “Flux compactifications in string theory: A Comprehensive review,”Phys. Rept.423(2006) 91–158,arXiv:hep-th/0509003

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  9. [9]

    Toward Realistic Intersecting D-Brane Models

    R. Blumenhagen, M. Cvetic, P. Langacker, and G. Shiu, “Toward realistic intersecting D-brane models,”Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.55(2005) 71–139,arXiv:hep-th/0502005

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  10. [10]

    Buchmüller and J

    W. Buchmüller and J. Louis,Particle Physics from String Compactifications, pp. 3–18. 2018

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Marchesano, G

    F. Marchesano, G. Shiu, and T. Weigand, “The Standard Model from String Theory: What Have We Learned?,”Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.74(2024) 113–140, arXiv:2401.01939 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Dirichlet-Branes and Ramond-Ramond Charges

    J. Polchinski, “Dirichlet Branes and Ramond-Ramond charges,”Phys. Rev. Lett.75 (1995) 4724–4727,arXiv:hep-th/9510017. 70

    work page Pith review arXiv 1995

  13. [13]

    Blumenhagen, D

    R. Blumenhagen, D. Lüst, and S. Theisen,Basic concepts of string theory. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2013

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Supergravity and the Spinor Dual Model,

    F. Gliozzi, J. Scherk, and D. I. Olive, “Supergravity and the Spinor Dual Model,”Phys. Lett. B65(1976) 282–286

    work page 1976

  15. [15]

    Nonlinear Electrodynamics from Quantized Strings,

    E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, “Nonlinear Electrodynamics from Quantized Strings,” Phys. Lett. B163(1985) 123–130

    work page 1985

  16. [16]

    Foundations of the new field theory,

    M. Born and L. Infeld, “Foundations of the new field theory,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 144no. 852, (1934) 425–451

    work page 1934

  17. [17]

    An Extensible model of the electron,

    P. A. M. Dirac, “An Extensible model of the electron,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A268 (1962) 57–67

    work page 1962

  18. [18]

    Open strings in background gauge fields,

    A. Abouelsaood, C. G. Callan, Jr., C. R. Nappi, and S. A. Yost, “Open strings in background gauge fields,”Nucl. Phys. B280(1987) 599–624

    work page 1987

  19. [19]

    Ortin,Gravity and Strings

    T. Ortin,Gravity and Strings. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed. ed., 7, 2015

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    P. K. Townsend,P-Brane Democracy, pp. 375–389. 4, 2014.arXiv:hep-th/9507048

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  21. [21]

    Duality of Type II 7-branes and 8-branes

    E. Bergshoeff, M. de Roo, M. B. Green, G. Papadopoulos, and P. K. Townsend, “Duality of type II 7 branes and 8 branes,”Nucl. Phys. B470(1996) 113–135, arXiv:hep-th/9601150

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  22. [22]

    New Formulations of D=10 Supersymmetry and D8-O8 Domain Walls

    E. Bergshoeff, R. Kallosh, T. Ortin, D. Roest, and A. Van Proeyen, “New formulations of D = 10 supersymmetry and D8 - O8 domain walls,”Class. Quant. Grav.18(2001) 3359–3382,arXiv:hep-th/0103233

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  23. [23]

    Self-duality of Born-Infeld action and Dirichlet 3-brane of type IIB superstring theory

    A. A. Tseytlin, “Selfduality of Born-Infeld action and Dirichlet three-brane of type IIB superstring theory,”Nucl. Phys. B469(1996) 51–67,arXiv:hep-th/9602064

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  24. [24]

    Dual D-brane actions,

    M. Aganagic, J. Park, C. Popescu, and J. H. Schwarz, “Dual D-brane actions,”Nucl. Phys. B496(1997) 215–230,arXiv:hep-th/9702133

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1997

  25. [25]

    The invariant action for solitonic 5-branes,

    E. T. Musaev and J. P. Molina, “The invariant action for solitonic 5-branes,”Eur. Phys. J. C82no. 11, (2022) 978,arXiv:2205.07526 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Type IIB Superstrings, BPS Monopoles, And Three-Dimensional Gauge Dynamics

    A. Hanany and E. Witten, “Type IIB superstrings, BPS monopoles, and three-dimensional gauge dynamics,”Nucl. Phys. B492(1997) 152–190, arXiv:hep-th/9611230. 71

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  27. [27]

    Super p-Branes,

    A. Achucarro, J. M. Evans, P. K. Townsend, and D. L. Wiltshire, “Super p-Branes,” Phys. Lett. B198(1987) 441–446

    work page 1987

  28. [28]

    A Consistent Interacting Massless Higher Spin Field Theory inD= (2+1),

    M. P. Blencowe, “A Consistent Interacting Massless Higher Spin Field Theory inD= (2+1),”Class. Quant. Grav.6(1989) 443

    work page 1989

  29. [29]

    Black and super p-branes in diverse dimensions,

    M. J. Duff and J. X. Lu, “Black and super p-branes in diverse dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B416(1994) 301–334,arXiv:hep-th/9306052

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1994

  30. [30]

    String Solitons

    M. J. Duff, R. R. Khuri, and J. X. Lu, “String solitons,”Phys. Rept.259(1995) 213–326, arXiv:hep-th/9412184

    work page Pith review arXiv 1995

  31. [31]

    D-branes from M-branes

    P. K. Townsend, “D-branes from M-branes,”Phys. Lett. B373(1996) 68–75, arXiv:hep-th/9512062

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  32. [32]

    BPS branes in supergravity,

    K. S. Stelle, “BPS branes in supergravity,” inICTP Summer School in High-energy Physics and Cosmology. 3, 1998.arXiv:hep-th/9803116

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  33. [33]

    Superstrings and Solitons,

    A. Dabholkar, G. W. Gibbons, J. A. Harvey, and F. Ruiz Ruiz, “Superstrings and Solitons,”Nucl. Phys. B340(1990) 33–55

    work page 1990

  34. [34]

    Heterotic solitons,

    A. Strominger, “Heterotic solitons,”Nucl. Phys. B343(1990) 167–184. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 353, 565–565 (1991)]

    work page 1990

  35. [35]

    Multi-membrane solutions of D = 11 supergravity,

    M. J. Duff and K. S. Stelle, “Multi-membrane solutions of D = 11 supergravity,”Phys. Lett. B253(1991) 113–118

    work page 1991

  36. [36]

    Black strings and P-branes,

    G. T. Horowitz and A. Strominger, “Black strings and P-branes,”Nucl. Phys. B360 (1991) 197–209

    work page 1991

  37. [37]

    Comparing d-branes to black-branes,

    G. Lifschytz, “Comparing d-branes to black-branes,”Phys. Lett. B388(1996) 720–726, arXiv:hep-th/9604156

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1996

  38. [38]

    World Volume Approach to Absorption by Non-dilatonic Branes

    I. R. Klebanov, “World volume approach to absorption by nondilatonic branes,”Nucl. Phys. B496(1997) 231–242,arXiv:hep-th/9702076

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  39. [39]

    D-brane Approach to Black Hole Quantum Mechanics

    C. G. Callan and J. M. Maldacena, “D-brane approach to black hole quantum mechanics,”Nucl. Phys. B472(1996) 591–610,arXiv:hep-th/9602043

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  40. [40]

    J. M. Maldacena,Black holes in string theory. PhD thesis, Princeton U., 1996. arXiv:hep-th/9607235

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  41. [41]

    Black p-brane solutions of D = 11 supergravity theory,

    R. Gueven, “Black p-brane solutions of D = 11 supergravity theory,”Phys. Lett. B276 (1992) 49–55. 72

    work page 1992

  42. [42]

    Magnetic Monopoles in Kaluza-Klein Theories,

    D. J. Gross and M. J. Perry, “Magnetic Monopoles in Kaluza-Klein Theories,”Nucl. Phys. B226(1983) 29–48

    work page 1983

  43. [43]

    Gravitational duality, branes and charges,

    C. M. Hull, “Gravitational duality, branes and charges,”Nucl. Phys. B509(1998) 216–251,arXiv:hep-th/9705162

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  44. [44]

    Massive branes,

    E. Bergshoeff, Y. Lozano, and T. Ortin, “Massive branes,”Nucl. Phys. B518(1998) 363–423,arXiv:hep-th/9712115

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  45. [45]

    Hull,Magnetic charges for the graviton,JHEP05(2024) 257 [2310.18441]

    C. M. Hull, “Magnetic charges for the graviton,”JHEP05(2024) 257, arXiv:2310.18441 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    The dual graviton in duality covariant theories

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben, “The dual graviton in duality covariant theories,”Fortsch. Phys.67no. 5, (2019) 1900021,arXiv:1807.07150 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Is string theory a theory of strings?,

    C. V. Johnson, N. Kaloper, R. R. Khuri, and R. C. Myers, “Is string theory a theory of strings?,”Phys. Lett. B368(1996) 71–77,arXiv:hep-th/9509070

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1996

  48. [48]

    Four Lectures on M-theory

    P. K. Townsend, “Four lectures on M theory,” inICTP Summer School in High-energy Physics and Cosmology, pp. 385–438. 12, 1996.arXiv:hep-th/9612121

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  49. [49]

    Harmonic superpositions of M-branes

    A. A. Tseytlin, “Harmonic superpositions of M-branes,”Nucl. Phys. B475(1996) 149–163,arXiv:hep-th/9604035

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  50. [50]

    C. V. Johnson,D-Branes. Cambridge University Press, 2003

    work page 2003

  51. [51]

    Branes within Branes

    M. R. Douglas, “Branes within branes,”NATO Sci. Ser. C520(1999) 267–275, arXiv:hep-th/9512077

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1999

  52. [52]

    Bound States Of Strings And $p$-Branes

    E. Witten, “Bound states of strings and p-branes,”Nucl. Phys. B460(1996) 335–350, arXiv:hep-th/9510135

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  53. [53]

    Nonthreshold (f, Dp) bound states,

    J. X. Lu and S. Roy, “Nonthreshold (f, Dp) bound states,”Nucl. Phys. B560(1999) 181–206,arXiv:hep-th/9904129

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1999

  54. [54]

    More D-brane bound states,

    J. C. Breckenridge, G. Michaud, and R. C. Myers, “More D-brane bound states,”Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 6438–6446,arXiv:hep-th/9611174

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1997

  55. [55]

    Supergravity and Space-Time Non-Commutative Open String Theory

    T. Harmark, “Supergravity and space-time noncommutative open string theory,”JHEP 07(2000) 043,arXiv:hep-th/0006023

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  56. [56]

    Brane Dynamics and Gauge Theory

    A. Giveon and D. Kutasov, “Brane Dynamics and Gauge Theory,”Rev. Mod. Phys.71 (1999) 983–1084,arXiv:hep-th/9802067. 73

    work page Pith review arXiv 1999

  57. [57]

    Chiral four-dimensional string compactifications with intersecting D-branes,

    A. M. Uranga, “Chiral four-dimensional string compactifications with intersecting D-branes,”Class. Quant. Grav.20(2003) S373–S394,arXiv:hep-th/0301032

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2003

  58. [58]

    Matrix Description of M-theory on $T^5$ and $T^5/Z_2$

    N. Seiberg, “New theories in six-dimensions and matrix description of M theory on T**5 and T**5 / Z(2),”Phys. Lett. B408(1997) 98–104,arXiv:hep-th/9705221

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  59. [59]

    M & m’s,

    A. Losev, G. W. Moore, and S. L. Shatashvili, “M & m’s,”Nucl. Phys. B522(1998) 105–124,arXiv:hep-th/9707250

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  60. [60]

    A brief review of "little string theories"

    O. Aharony, “A Brief review of ’little string theories’,”Class. Quant. Grav.17(2000) 929–938,arXiv:hep-th/9911147

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  61. [61]

    Introduction to little string theory,

    D. Kutasov, “Introduction to little string theory,”ICTP Lect. Notes Ser.7(2002) 165–209

    work page 2002

  62. [62]

    S. S. Gubser,The Little Book of String Theory. Princeton University Press, 2, 2010

    work page 2010

  63. [63]

    Open P-Branes

    A. Strominger, “Open p-branes,”Phys. Lett. B383(1996) 44–47, arXiv:hep-th/9512059

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  64. [64]

    The eleven-dimensional supermembrane revisited

    P. K. Townsend, “The eleven-dimensional supermembrane revisited,”Phys. Lett. B350 (1995) 184–187,arXiv:hep-th/9501068

    work page Pith review arXiv 1995

  65. [65]

    The Selfdual string soliton,

    P. S. Howe, N. D. Lambert, and P. C. West, “The Selfdual string soliton,”Nucl. Phys. B 515(1998) 203–216,arXiv:hep-th/9709014

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  66. [66]

    Chern-Simons terms and the Three Notions of Charge

    D. Marolf, “Chern-Simons terms and the three notions of charge,” inInternational Conference on Quantization, Gauge Theory, and Strings: Conference Dedicated to the Memory of Professor Efim Fradkin, pp. 312–320. 6, 2000.arXiv:hep-th/0006117

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2000

  67. [67]

    Dirac Charge Quantization and Generalized Differential Cohomology

    D. S. Freed, “Dirac charge quantization and generalized differential cohomology,” arXiv:hep-th/0011220

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  68. [68]

    Quantization of Topological Mass in the Presence of a Magnetic Pole,

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, “Quantization of Topological Mass in the Presence of a Magnetic Pole,”Phys. Rev. Lett.56(1986) 689–692

    work page 1986

  69. [69]

    Monopoles of Higher Rank,

    C. Teitelboim, “Monopoles of Higher Rank,”Phys. Lett. B167(1986) 69–72

    work page 1986

  70. [70]

    P FORM ELECTRODYNAMICS,

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, “P FORM ELECTRODYNAMICS,”Found. Phys.16 (1986) 593–617

    work page 1986

  71. [71]

    Gravitational Anomaly Cancellation for M-Theory Fivebranes

    D. Freed, J. A. Harvey, R. Minasian, and G. W. Moore, “Gravitational anomaly cancellation for M theory five-branes,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 601–618, arXiv:hep-th/9803205. 74

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

  72. [72]

    Self-Duality, Ramond-Ramond Fields, and K-Theory

    G. W. Moore and E. Witten, “Selfduality, Ramond-Ramond fields, and K theory,”JHEP 05(2000) 032,arXiv:hep-th/9912279

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  73. [73]

    K-theory and Ramond-Ramond charge

    R. Minasian and G. W. Moore, “K theory and Ramond-Ramond charge,”JHEP11 (1997) 002,arXiv:hep-th/9710230

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  74. [74]

    Dielectric-Branes

    R. C. Myers, “Dielectric branes,”JHEP12(1999) 022,arXiv:hep-th/9910053

    work page Pith review arXiv 1999

  75. [75]

    The Fuzzy sphere,

    J. Madore, “The Fuzzy sphere,”Class. Quant. Grav.9(1992) 69–88

    work page 1992

  76. [76]

    Noncommutative Geometry and Matrix Theory: Compactification on Tori

    A. Connes, M. R. Douglas, and A. S. Schwarz, “Noncommutative geometry and matrix theory: Compactification on tori,”JHEP02(1998) 003,arXiv:hep-th/9711162

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

  77. [77]

    Noncommutative Field Theory

    M. R. Douglas and N. A. Nekrasov, “Noncommutative field theory,”Rev. Mod. Phys.73 (2001) 977–1029,arXiv:hep-th/0106048

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  78. [78]

    Quantum Field Theory on Noncommutative Spaces

    R. J. Szabo, “Quantum field theory on noncommutative spaces,”Phys. Rept.378(2003) 207–299,arXiv:hep-th/0109162

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  79. [79]

    On nonAbelian generalization of Born-Infeld action in string theory,

    A. A. Tseytlin, “On nonAbelian generalization of Born-Infeld action in string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B501(1997) 41–52,arXiv:hep-th/9701125

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1997

  80. [80]

    Multiple D0-branes in weakly curved backgrounds,

    W. Taylor and M. Van Raamsdonk, “Multiple D0-branes in weakly curved backgrounds,” Nucl. Phys. B558(1999) 63–95,arXiv:hep-th/9904095

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1999

Showing first 80 references.