Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Participatory AI: A Scandinavian Approach to Human-Centered AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2509.12752 v2 pith:TX46EIJY submitted 2025-09-16 cs.HC

Participatory AI: A Scandinavian Approach to Human-Centered AI

classification cs.HC
keywords humanautomationparticipatoryagencyalgorithmicapproachartifactchallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

AI's transformative impact on work, education, and everyday life makes it as much a political artifact as a technological one. Current AI models are opaque, centralized, and overly generic. The algorithmic automation they provide threatens human agency and democratic values in both workplaces and daily life. To confront such challenges, we turn to Scandinavian Participatory Design (PD), which was devised in the 1970s to face a similar threat from mechanical automation. In the PD tradition, technology is seen not just as an artifact, but as a locus of democracy. Drawing from this tradition, we propose Participatory AI as a PD approach to human-centered AI that applies five PD principles to four design challenges for algorithmic automation. We use concrete case studies to illustrate how to treat AI models less as proprietary products and more as shared socio-technical systems that enhance rather than diminish human agency, human dignity, and human values.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Editorial Alignment: A Participatory Approach to Engaging Editorial Expertise in LLM-mediated Knowledge Dissemination

    cs.HC 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The paper introduces 'editorial alignment' as a participatory design practice that treats editorial standards as design artifacts to guide LLM behavior in knowledge dissemination, shown through workshops at one Nordic...

  2. Context-Mediated Domain Adaptation in Multi-Agent Sensemaking Systems

    cs.HC 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Context-mediated domain adaptation treats user modifications to AI artifacts as implicit domain specifications that reshape LLM-powered multi-agent reasoning, demonstrated via the Seedentia system which extracted 46 d...