Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ProGCL: Rethinking Hard Negative Mining in Graph Contrastive Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.02027 v3 pith:UY3N5HBB submitted 2021-10-05 cs.AI

ProGCL: Rethinking Hard Negative Mining in Graph Contrastive Learning

classification cs.AI
keywords negativesprogclanchorhardlearningothercontrastivegraph
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Contrastive Learning (CL) has emerged as a dominant technique for unsupervised representation learning which embeds augmented versions of the anchor close to each other (positive samples) and pushes the embeddings of other samples (negatives) apart. As revealed in recent studies, CL can benefit from hard negatives (negatives that are most similar to the anchor). However, we observe limited benefits when we adopt existing hard negative mining techniques of other domains in Graph Contrastive Learning (GCL). We perform both experimental and theoretical analysis on this phenomenon and find it can be attributed to the message passing of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). Unlike CL in other domains, most hard negatives are potentially false negatives (negatives that share the same class with the anchor) if they are selected merely according to the similarities between anchor and themselves, which will undesirably push away the samples of the same class. To remedy this deficiency, we propose an effective method, dubbed \textbf{ProGCL}, to estimate the probability of a negative being true one, which constitutes a more suitable measure for negatives' hardness together with similarity. Additionally, we devise two schemes (i.e., \textbf{ProGCL-weight} and \textbf{ProGCL-mix}) to boost the performance of GCL. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ProGCL brings notable and consistent improvements over base GCL methods and yields multiple state-of-the-art results on several unsupervised benchmarks or even exceeds the performance of supervised ones. Also, ProGCL is readily pluggable into various negatives-based GCL methods for performance improvement. We release the code at \textcolor{magenta}{\url{https://github.com/junxia97/ProGCL}}.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. UNICS: Multilingual Code Search via Unified Pseudocode and Contrastive Transfer Learning

    cs.SE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    UNICS pre-trains on a pseudocode dataset for cross-lingual logic then applies multi-task transfer learning with hard-positive mining and dynamic hard-negative sampling to reach claimed SOTA on multilingual code-search...

  2. Color2Struct: efficient and accurate deep-learning inverse design of structural color with controllable inference

    physics.optics 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Color2Struct is a deep learning framework for inverse design of structural colors that improves on tandem networks by 65% in color difference and 48% in short-wave near-infrared reflectivity through sampling bias corr...