REVIEW
On the Certainty-Equivalence Approach to Direct Data-Driven LQR Design
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
On the Certainty-Equivalence Approach to Direct Data-Driven LQR Design
read the original abstract
The linear quadratic regulator (LQR) problem is a cornerstone of automatic control, and it has been widely studied in the data-driven setting. The various data-driven approaches can be classified as indirect (i.e., based on an identified model) versus direct or as robust (i.e., taking uncertainty into account) versus certainty-equivalence. Here we show how to bridge these different formulations and propose a novel, direct, and regularized formulation. We start from indirect certainty-equivalence LQR, i.e., least-square identification of state-space matrices followed by a nominal model-based design, formalized as a bi-level program. We show how to transform this problem into a single-level, regularized, and direct data-driven control formulation, where the regularizer accounts for the least-square data fitting criterion. For this novel formulation we carry out a robustness and performance analysis in presence of noisy data. Our proposed direct and regularized formulation is also amenable to be further blended with a robust-stability-promoting regularizer. In a numerical case study we compare regularizers promoting either robustness or certainty-equivalence, and we demonstrate the remarkable performance when blending both of them.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.