Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Impact of Gender Debiased Word Embeddings in Language Modeling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.00908 v3 pith:YEZF5HEV submitted 2021-05-03 cs.CL

Impact of Gender Debiased Word Embeddings in Language Modeling

classification cs.CL
keywords dataembeddingslanguagepre-trainedwhenbiasesdebiasedtrained
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Gender, race and social biases have recently been detected as evident examples of unfairness in applications of Natural Language Processing. A key path towards fairness is to understand, analyse and interpret our data and algorithms. Recent studies have shown that the human-generated data used in training is an apparent factor of getting biases. In addition, current algorithms have also been proven to amplify biases from data. To further address these concerns, in this paper, we study how an state-of-the-art recurrent neural language model behaves when trained on data, which under-represents females, using pre-trained standard and debiased word embeddings. Results show that language models inherit higher bias when trained on unbalanced data when using pre-trained embeddings, in comparison with using embeddings trained within the task. Moreover, results show that, on the same data, language models inherit lower bias when using debiased pre-trained emdeddings, compared to using standard pre-trained embeddings.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.