REVIEW 1 cited by
Question Answering for Privacy Policies: Combining Computational and Legal Perspectives
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Question Answering for Privacy Policies: Combining Computational and Legal Perspectives
read the original abstract
Privacy policies are long and complex documents that are difficult for users to read and understand, and yet, they have legal effects on how user data is collected, managed and used. Ideally, we would like to empower users to inform themselves about issues that matter to them, and enable them to selectively explore those issues. We present PrivacyQA, a corpus consisting of 1750 questions about the privacy policies of mobile applications, and over 3500 expert annotations of relevant answers. We observe that a strong neural baseline underperforms human performance by almost 0.3 F1 on PrivacyQA, suggesting considerable room for improvement for future systems. Further, we use this dataset to shed light on challenges to question answerability, with domain-general implications for any question answering system. The PrivacyQA corpus offers a challenging corpus for question answering, with genuine real-world utility.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Do Privacy Policies Match with the Logs? An Empirical Study of Privacy Disclosure in Android Application Logs
Only 0.4% of 1,000 Android apps show consistent alignment between their privacy policies and actual log contents, while 67.6% leak sensitive information not mentioned in policies.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.