Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A no-regret generalization of hierarchical softmax to extreme multi-label classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.11671 v1 pith:XIAJDBXM submitted 2018-10-27 cs.LG stat.ML

A no-regret generalization of hierarchical softmax to extreme multi-label classification

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords multi-labellabelspltsproblemsusedxmlcclassificationextreme
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Extreme multi-label classification (XMLC) is a problem of tagging an instance with a small subset of relevant labels chosen from an extremely large pool of possible labels. Large label spaces can be efficiently handled by organizing labels as a tree, like in the hierarchical softmax (HSM) approach commonly used for multi-class problems. In this paper, we investigate probabilistic label trees (PLTs) that have been recently devised for tackling XMLC problems. We show that PLTs are a no-regret multi-label generalization of HSM when precision@k is used as a model evaluation metric. Critically, we prove that pick-one-label heuristic - a reduction technique from multi-label to multi-class that is routinely used along with HSM - is not consistent in general. We also show that our implementation of PLTs, referred to as extremeText (XT), obtains significantly better results than HSM with the pick-one-label heuristic and XML-CNN, a deep network specifically designed for XMLC problems. Moreover, XT is competitive to many state-of-the-art approaches in terms of statistical performance, model size and prediction time which makes it amenable to deploy in an online system.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Decision-Aligned Evaluation of Uncertainty Quantification

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces decision-alignment to evaluate uncertainty metrics against downstream decision utilities and proposes prior-weighted proper scoring rules that align better in benchmarks and case studies.