Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

BanditSum: Extractive Summarization as a Contextual Bandit

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.09672 v3 pith:KEMOVTRO submitted 2018-09-25 cs.CL

BanditSum: Extractive Summarization as a Contextual Bandit

classification cs.CL
keywords extractivebanditsumsummarizationsentencesapproachesbanditbettercompeting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we propose a novel method for training neural networks to perform single-document extractive summarization without heuristically-generated extractive labels. We call our approach BanditSum as it treats extractive summarization as a contextual bandit (CB) problem, where the model receives a document to summarize (the context), and chooses a sequence of sentences to include in the summary (the action). A policy gradient reinforcement learning algorithm is used to train the model to select sequences of sentences that maximize ROUGE score. We perform a series of experiments demonstrating that BanditSum is able to achieve ROUGE scores that are better than or comparable to the state-of-the-art for extractive summarization, and converges using significantly fewer update steps than competing approaches. In addition, we show empirically that BanditSum performs significantly better than competing approaches when good summary sentences appear late in the source document.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Learning to summarize from human feedback

    cs.CL 2020-09 conditional novelty 7.0

    Reinforcement learning on a reward model trained from human summary comparisons produces summaries humans prefer over supervised fine-tuning or human references on TL;DR and transfers to CNN/DM.

  2. Context Attribution with Multi-Armed Bandit Optimization

    cs.AI 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Formulates context attribution as a combinatorial multi-armed bandit problem solved via Linear Thompson Sampling to reduce LLM queries by up to 30% on QA benchmarks while matching existing attribution quality.

  3. EMBER: Efficient Memory via Budgeted Evidence Retention for Long-Horizon Agents

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    EMBER learns to retain source-backed evidence capsules under a fixed token budget, improving F1, Retain-Recall, and Read-Recall on LongMemEval-RR over budgeted baselines.