pith. sign in

arxiv: 1801.00690 · v1 · pith:IUSU7BX2new · submitted 2018-01-02 · 💻 cs.AI

DeepMind Control Suite

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 07:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI
keywords reinforcement learningcontinuous controlbenchmark suiteMuJoCorobotics simulationpolicy learning
0
0 comments X

The pith

The DeepMind Control Suite offers a standardized set of continuous control tasks to benchmark reinforcement learning agents.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces the DeepMind Control Suite, a collection of continuous control tasks designed with a standardized structure and interpretable rewards. The tasks are written in Python and use the MuJoCo physics engine, making them straightforward to use and customize. By providing these benchmarks along with performance data for several algorithms, the suite aims to facilitate fair comparisons between different reinforcement learning methods. A sympathetic reader would care because consistent benchmarks can accelerate progress in the field by reducing the need for researchers to create their own test environments.

Core claim

The authors present the Control Suite as a publicly available set of continuous control tasks with standardized structure and interpretable rewards, powered by MuJoCo and implemented in Python, intended to serve as performance benchmarks for reinforcement learning agents.

What carries the argument

The Control Suite, a set of continuous control tasks with standardized structure and interpretable rewards.

If this is right

  • Algorithms can be evaluated and compared using the same tasks and rewards.
  • Researchers can easily modify the tasks due to the Python implementation.
  • The suite includes initial benchmarks for several learning algorithms.
  • The tasks are accessible to the public via the provided repository.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Widespread adoption could lead to more reproducible results in continuous control research.
  • Success on these tasks may suggest potential for real-world applications, though further validation would be needed.
  • The design choices might influence how future control benchmarks are structured.

Load-bearing premise

The selected tasks and their reward functions adequately represent real-world continuous control challenges so that performance generalizes.

What would settle it

Demonstrating that top-performing agents on the Control Suite perform poorly on a new set of similar control tasks not included in the suite would falsify its value as a general benchmark.

read the original abstract

The DeepMind Control Suite is a set of continuous control tasks with a standardised structure and interpretable rewards, intended to serve as performance benchmarks for reinforcement learning agents. The tasks are written in Python and powered by the MuJoCo physics engine, making them easy to use and modify. We include benchmarks for several learning algorithms. The Control Suite is publicly available at https://www.github.com/deepmind/dm_control . A video summary of all tasks is available at http://youtu.be/rAai4QzcYbs .

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the DeepMind Control Suite, a collection of continuous control tasks implemented in Python and powered by the MuJoCo physics engine. The tasks feature a standardized structure and interpretable rewards, are intended to serve as performance benchmarks for reinforcement learning agents, and the paper supplies baseline results for several algorithms along with a public code release at https://www.github.com/deepmind/dm_control.

Significance. The release of a standardized, open-source benchmark suite with working code, clear task definitions, and reported baseline numbers constitutes a useful contribution to the RL community by enabling reproducible comparisons on continuous control problems. The absence of free parameters or invented entities in the central claim, combined with the provision of executable environments, strengthens the practical value if the suite sees adoption.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Baselines] § on baseline experiments: specify the exact number of random seeds and the precise hyperparameter settings used for each algorithm to allow exact reproduction of the reported scores.
  2. [Task descriptions] Figure 1 (task illustrations): ensure all panels use consistent axis scaling and label units explicitly so that reward magnitudes are immediately comparable across tasks.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive review of the manuscript and their recommendation to accept. We are pleased that the standardized benchmark suite and its public release are viewed as a useful contribution to the reinforcement learning community.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper presents the DeepMind Control Suite as a collection of standardized continuous-control environments with interpretable rewards, implemented in Python atop MuJoCo, together with baseline runs of several existing RL algorithms. No derivation chain, predictive claim, or uniqueness theorem is advanced; the central contribution is the release of the task definitions and code at the cited GitHub repository, whose correctness is directly verifiable by inspection and execution rather than by any reduction to author-defined parameters or self-citations. Baseline numbers are simply reported outcomes of running published algorithms on the released tasks and do not constitute fitted predictions that loop back to the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a software and benchmarking contribution rather than a mathematical derivation. No free parameters are fitted to produce a central claim, no new axioms are introduced, and no invented entities are postulated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5413 in / 1005 out tokens · 28109 ms · 2026-05-13T07:40:16.913388+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 60 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. From Reward-Free Representations to Preferences: Rethinking Offline Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    A reward-free representation learning pipeline for offline PbRL achieves better preference efficiency than standard two-stage baselines by connecting RFRL concepts to preference data.

  2. When Does LeJEPA Learn a World Model?

    stat.ML 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    LeJEPA achieves linear identifiability of latent variables uniquely when the latents are Gaussian in worlds with stationary additive-noise transitions.

  3. Language Game: Talking to Non-Human Systems

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    A language-game framework enables dialogue with dynamical systems such as GRNs by treating their frozen dynamics as an RL policy core, using an LM to route prompts so the system responds through its own behavior witho...

  4. Adversarial Imitation Learning with General Function Approximation: Theoretical Analysis and Practical Algorithms

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    OPT-AIL provides the first provably efficient adversarial imitation learning algorithms under general function approximation, achieving polynomial expert sample and interaction complexity.

  5. BEHAVIOR-1K: A Human-Centered, Embodied AI Benchmark with 1,000 Everyday Activities and Realistic Simulation

    cs.RO 2024-03 accept novelty 8.0

    BEHAVIOR-1K introduces a benchmark of 1,000 human everyday activities in realistic simulated scenes together with the OMNIGIBSON physics simulator to evaluate embodied AI.

  6. MPC-Injection: Biasing Off-Policy Locomotion RL Toward Controller-Induced Behavior Basins

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    MPC-Injection biases off-policy RL locomotion policies toward controller-induced behavior basins by injecting MPC transitions into the replay buffer.

  7. Stealthy World Model Manipulation via Data Poisoning

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SWAAP is the first two-stage poisoning framework that identifies a harmful target world model via bilevel optimization and realizes it through stealth-constrained gradient matching on a limited fraction of fine-tuning...

  8. Expected Free Energy-based Planning as Variational Inference

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    EFE-based planning is formulated as variational free energy minimization with epistemic priors, decomposing into expected plan costs plus a complexity term.

  9. WMAttack: Automated Attack Search for Adversarial Evaluation of World-Model Agents

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    WMAttack automates finite-budget attack search for world-model agents via SCAS and RGAR, reporting higher normalized reward drops than baselines on Atari and DMC tasks.

  10. ARC-RL: A Reinforcement Learning Playground Inspired by ARC Raiders

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ARC-RL provides four new MuJoCo continuous-control environments with hexapod and quadruped morphologies inspired by ARC Raiders, a unified multi-component reward without motion capture, CPG expert demonstrators, and e...

  11. Randomized Advantage Transformation (RAT): Computing Natural Policy Gradients via Direct Backpropagation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    RAT reformulates regularized natural policy gradients as vanilla gradients with a transformed advantage, computed efficiently via randomized block Kaczmarz iterations on on-policy data.

  12. Revisiting Mixture Policies in Entropy-Regularized Actor-Critic

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new marginalized reparameterization estimator allows low-variance training of mixture policies in entropy-regularized actor-critic algorithms, matching or exceeding Gaussian policy performance in several continuous ...

  13. Generative Actor-Critic with Soft Bridge Policies

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SoftGAC defines a stochastic bridge from base to action latent that converts the MaxEnt objective into a tractable relative-entropy term reducible to control energy, achieving competitive returns with one-pass sampling.

  14. Agentick: A Unified Benchmark for General Sequential Decision-Making Agents

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Agentick is a new benchmark for sequential decision-making agents that evaluates RL, LLM, VLM, hybrid, and human approaches across 37 tasks and finds no single method dominates.

  15. KinDER: A Physical Reasoning Benchmark for Robot Learning and Planning

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    KinDER is a new open-source benchmark that demonstrates substantial gaps in current robot learning and planning methods for handling physical constraints.

  16. Agent-Centric Observation Adaptation for Robust Visual Control under Dynamic Perturbations

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ACO-MoE recovers 95.3% of clean-input performance in visual control tasks under Markov-switching corruptions by routing restoration experts and anchoring representations to clean foreground masks.

  17. Agent-Centric Observation Adaptation for Robust Visual Control under Dynamic Perturbations

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ACO-MoE employs agent-centric mixture-of-experts to decouple task-relevant features from dynamic visual perturbations in RL, recovering 95.3% of clean performance on the new VDCS benchmark.

  18. Leveraging Human Feedback for Semantically-Relevant Skill Discovery

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SRSD uses human-provided semantic labels to learn rewards that encourage reinforcement learning agents to discover a wide variety of meaningful and distinct behaviors.

  19. Intentional Updates for Streaming Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Intentional TD and Intentional Policy Gradient select step sizes for fixed fractional TD error reduction and bounded policy KL divergence, yielding stable streaming deep RL performance on par with batch methods.

  20. Beyond Bellman: High-Order Generator Regression for Continuous-Time Policy Evaluation

    stat.ML 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    High-order generator regression from multi-step trajectories yields a second-order accurate estimator for finite-horizon continuous-time policy evaluation that outperforms the Bellman baseline in calibration studies a...

  21. Learning Interactive Real-World Simulators

    cs.AI 2023-10 conditional novelty 7.0

    UniSim learns a universal real-world simulator from orchestrated diverse datasets, enabling zero-shot deployment of policies trained purely in simulation.

  22. Mastering Diverse Domains through World Models

    cs.AI 2023-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DreamerV3 uses world models and robustness techniques to solve over 150 tasks across domains with a single configuration, including Minecraft diamond collection from scratch.

  23. A Generalist Agent

    cs.AI 2022-05 accept novelty 7.0

    Gato is a multi-modal, multi-task, multi-embodiment generalist policy using one transformer network to handle text, vision, games, and robotics tasks.

  24. Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imagination

    cs.LG 2019-12 accept novelty 7.0

    Dreamer learns to control from images by imagining and optimizing behaviors in a learned latent world model, outperforming prior methods on 20 visual tasks in data efficiency and final performance.

  25. Benchmarking Model-Based Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2019-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Introduces a benchmark suite of over 18 MBRL environments, evaluates multiple algorithms under consistent settings, and identifies three core challenges: dynamics bottleneck, planning horizon dilemma, and early-termin...

  26. ACID: Action Consistency via Inverse Dynamics for Planning with World Models

    cs.RO 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ACID improves decision-time planning in world models by adding per-step action consistency residuals from an inverse dynamics model to the planning cost via an adaptive weight, yielding better performance with less co...

  27. Coachable agents for interactive gameplay

    cs.AI 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A framework combining universal value function approximators with targeted training scenarios and data augmentation produces RL agents that adapt to user-specified styles in real time across video games and humanoid d...

  28. Delta-JEPA: Learning Action-Sensitive World Models via Latent Difference Decoding

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Delta-JEPA augments latent forward prediction with a Latent Difference Action Decoder that reconstructs actions from embedding displacements, yielding action-sensitive world models that improve planning on four visual...

  29. Dual-Flow Reinforcement Learning with State-Aware Exploration

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Dual-Flow RL jointly models return distributions and multimodal policies via conditional flow matching with an added ECER for exploration, claiming SOTA results on control benchmarks.

  30. Fast LeWorldModel

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Fast-LeWM uses action-prefix encoding and parallel latent prediction to replace sequential rollout, improving success rates and cutting planning time in LeWorldModel tasks.

  31. NASDAQ: Normalized Observation Space Dynamics-Augmented Q-Learning

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    NASDAQ normalizes observations in an online RL setting so that dynamics prediction losses are balanced across dimensions, yielding competitive performance with lower wall-time than prior model-based and self-predictiv...

  32. CRAX: Fast Safe Reinforcement Learning Benchmarking

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CRAX is a new fast benchmark suite for constrained RL built on MJX, with six environment suites and tasks across difficulty levels, showing no single safe RL method dominates and benefits from curriculum learning.

  33. Sensorimotor World Models: Perception for Action via Inverse Dynamics

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SMWM trains end-to-end latent world models from offline reward-free data using inverse dynamics regularization to prevent collapse and align states with controllable actions for planning.

  34. ARC-RL: A Reinforcement Learning Playground Inspired by ARC Raiders

    cs.RO 2026-05 accept novelty 6.0

    ARC-RL is a new suite of four MuJoCo continuous-control environments featuring game-inspired hexapod and quadruped morphologies, a single closed-form multi-component reward function, CPG demonstrators, and empirical c...

  35. Sampling-Based Safe Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    SBSRL approximates worst-case safety optimization over uncertain dynamics via finite sampling, adds epistemic-uncertainty-constrained exploration, and supplies high-probability safety guarantees plus finite-time sampl...

  36. PH-Dreamer: A Physics-Driven World Model via Port-Hamiltonian Generative Dynamics

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PH-Dreamer integrates a port-Hamiltonian framework into generative world models to enforce physical priors, yielding tighter imagined-real reward alignment and reduced latent space volume on visual control benchmarks.

  37. R2R2: Robust Representation for Intensive Experience Reuse via Redundancy Reduction in Self-Predictive Learning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    R2R2 introduces a non-centered regularization objective for SPL that addresses conflicts with spectral properties, leading to better performance on continuous control tasks at high UTD ratios.

  38. Debiased Model-based Representations for Sample-efficient Continuous Control

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DR.Q debiases model-based representations for Q-learning by maximizing mutual information between state-action and next-state representations and applying faded prioritized experience replay, achieving competitive or ...

  39. When Does Non-Uniform Replay Matter in Reinforcement Learning?

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Non-uniform replay helps off-policy RL mainly at low replay volumes, high-entropy sampling matters even at similar recency, and Truncated Geometric replay offers a low-overhead practical solution.

  40. Predictive but Not Plannable: RC-aux for Latent World Models

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RC-aux corrects spatiotemporal mismatch in reconstruction-free latent world models by adding multi-horizon prediction and reachability supervision, improving planning performance on goal-conditioned pixel-control tasks.

  41. Agentick: A Unified Benchmark for General Sequential Decision-Making Agents

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Agentick is a new unified benchmark for sequential decision-making agents that evaluates RL, LLM, VLM, hybrid, and human agents across 37 tasks, showing no single approach dominates.

  42. Neural Co-state Policies: Structuring Hidden States in Recurrent Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Hidden states in recurrent RL policies correspond to PMP co-states, so a derived co-state loss structures the dynamics and yields robust performance on partially observable continuous control tasks.

  43. Extending Differential Temporal Difference Methods for Episodic Problems

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A generalization of differential TD extends it to episodic settings while preserving policy ordering, inheriting linear TD guarantees, and improving sample efficiency.

  44. TRAP: Tail-aware Ranking Attack for World-Model Planning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TRAP is a tail-aware ranking attack that plants a backdoor in world models so that a trigger causes the model to reorder a few critical imagined trajectories and redirect planning while preserving normal behavior on c...

  45. QHyer: Q-conditioned Hybrid Attention-mamba Transformer for Offline Goal-conditioned RL

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    QHyer replaces return-to-go with a state-conditioned Q-estimator and adds a gated hybrid attention-mamba backbone to achieve state-of-the-art performance in offline goal-conditioned RL on both Markovian and non-Markov...

  46. QHyer: Q-conditioned Hybrid Attention-mamba Transformer for Offline Goal-conditioned RL

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    QHyer achieves state-of-the-art results in offline goal-conditioned RL by replacing return-to-go with a state-conditioned Q-estimator and introducing a gated hybrid attention-mamba backbone for content-adaptive histor...

  47. Improving Zero-Shot Offline RL via Behavioral Task Sampling

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Extracting task vectors from the offline dataset for policy training improves zero-shot offline RL performance by an average of 20% over random sampling baselines.

  48. Beyond Bellman: High-Order Generator Regression for Continuous-Time Policy Evaluation

    stat.ML 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    High-order moment-matching estimation of the time-dependent generator improves continuous-time policy evaluation accuracy over first-order Bellman recursion by canceling lower-order truncation terms, with supporting e...

  49. Mean Flow Policy Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    Mean Flow Policy Optimization (MFPO) uses few-step flow-based models for RL policies and achieves performance on par with or better than diffusion-based methods while substantially lowering training and inference time...

  50. FlashSAC: Fast and Stable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning for High-Dimensional Robot Control

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    FlashSAC improves training speed and final performance of off-policy RL on high-dimensional robot tasks by reducing update frequency, increasing model scale, and bounding norms to limit critic error accumulation.

  51. FlashSAC: Fast and Stable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning for High-Dimensional Robot Control

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    FlashSAC scales up Soft Actor-Critic with fewer updates, larger models, higher data throughput, and norm bounds to deliver faster, more stable training than PPO on high-dimensional robot control tasks across dozens of...

  52. LeWorldModel: Stable End-to-End Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture from Pixels

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LeWM is the first end-to-end trainable JEPA from pixels that uses only two loss terms for stable training and fast planning on 2D/3D control tasks.

  53. How Does the Lagrangian Guide Safe Reinforcement Learning through Diffusion Models?

    cs.LG 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ALGD augments the Lagrangian to locally convexify the energy landscape in diffusion models, stabilizing safe RL training and generation without changing optimal policies.

  54. Use the Online Network If You Can: Towards Fast and Stable Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MINTO sets bootstrapped targets to the minimum of online and target network estimates, yielding faster stable value learning across online/offline RL and discrete/continuous actions.

  55. Robust Remote Reinforcement Learning over Unreliable Communication Channels using Homomorphic State Encoding

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    HR3L enables robust remote RL training over unreliable channels via homomorphic state encoding without gradient exchange, outperforming prior methods in sample efficiency and adapting to packet loss, delays, and bandw...

  56. RoboEval: Where Robotic Manipulation Meets Structured and Scalable Evaluation

    cs.RO 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RoboEval is a new benchmark providing eight bimanual tasks, thousands of expert demonstrations, and standardized metrics for efficiency, coordination, safety, and failure localization in robotic manipulation.

  57. Dream to Fly: Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Drone Flight

    cs.RO 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DreamerV3 enables pixel-to-control policies for drone racing that reach 9 m/s in both simulation and real hardware-in-the-loop tests.

  58. DINO-WM: World Models on Pre-trained Visual Features enable Zero-shot Planning

    cs.RO 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DINO-WM builds world models on pre-trained DINOv2 features to enable zero-shot planning from offline data without rewards or demonstrations.

  59. A Survey on Vision-Language-Action Models for Embodied AI

    cs.RO 2024-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    This is the first survey on vision-language-action models, providing a taxonomy across three lines, plus summaries of datasets, simulators, benchmarks, challenges, and future directions in embodied AI.

  60. Arena: a toolkit for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2019-07 accept novelty 6.0

    Arena introduces a modular Interface design that extends OpenAI Gym wrappers to support complex multi-agent RL scenarios including self-play and cooperative-competitive interactions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

13 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 83 Pith papers · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Layer Normalization

    Anonymous. Distributed prioritized experience replay.Under submission, 2017a. Anonymous. Distributional policy gradients.Under submission, 2017b. Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, and Geoffrey E Hinton. Layer normalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06450,

  2. [2]

    Barto, Richard S

    ISSN 0018-9472. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1983.6313077. Marc G Bellemare, Yavar Naddaf, Joel Veness, and Michael Bowling. The arcade learning environment: An evaluation platform for general agents.Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research,

  3. [3]

    A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learning

    Marc G Bellemare, Will Dabney, and Rémi Munos. A distributional perspective on rein- forcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06887,

  4. [4]

    Simulation tools for model-based robotics: Comparison of bullet, havok, mujoco, ode and physx

    Tom Erez, Yuval Tassa, and Emanuel Todorov. Simulation tools for model-based robotics: Comparison of bullet, havok, mujoco, ode and physx. In Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2015 IEEE International Conference on, pages 4397–4404. IEEE,

  5. [5]

    Reproducibility of Benchmarked Deep Reinforcement Learning Tasks for Continuous Control

    Riashat Islam, Peter Henderson, Maziar Gomrokchi, and Doina Precup. Reproducibility of benchmarked deep reinforcement learning tasks for continuous control.arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.04133,

  6. [6]

    Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

    Diederik Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980,

  7. [7]

    Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning

    Timothy P Lillicrap, Jonathan J Hunt, Alexander Pritzel, Nicolas Heess, Tom Erez, Yuval Tassa, David Silver, and Daan Wierstra. Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.02971,

  8. [8]

    Learning human behaviors from motion capture by adversarial imitation

    Josh Merel, Yuval Tassa, TB Dhruva, Sriram Srinivasan, Jay Lemmon, Ziyu Wang, Greg Wayne, and Nicolas Heess. Learning human behaviors from motion capture by adversarial imitation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.02201,

  9. [9]

    Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learning

    Volodymyr Mnih, Adria Puigdomenech Badia, Mehdi Mirza, Alex Graves, Timothy P Lilli- crap, Tim Harley, David Silver, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.01783,

  10. [10]

    ISSN 0028-0836. Letter. Ivaylo Popov, Nicolas Heess, Timothy Lillicrap, Roland Hafner, Gabriel Barth-Maron, Matej Vecerik, Thomas Lampe, Yuval Tassa, Tom Erez, and Martin Riedmiller. Data-efficient deepreinforcementlearningfordexterousmanipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.03073,

  11. [11]

    Prioritized Experience Replay

    Tom Schaul, John Quan, Ioannis Antonoglou, and David Silver. Prioritized experience replay. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.05952,

  12. [12]

    Synthesis and stabilization of complex be- haviors through online trajectory optimization

    Yuval Tassa, Tom Erez, and Emanuel Todorov. Synthesis and stabilization of complex be- haviors through online trajectory optimization. InIntelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, pages 4906–4913. IEEE,

  13. [13]

    Mujoco: A physics engine for model- based control

    Emanuel Todorov, Tom Erez, and Yuval Tassa. Mujoco: A physics engine for model- based control. InIntelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, pages 5026–5033. IEEE,