Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

OptionGAN: Learning Joint Reward-Policy Options using Generative Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1709.06683 v2 pith:BZKIAICT submitted 2017-09-20 cs.LG

OptionGAN: Learning Joint Reward-Policy Options using Generative Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning

classification cs.LG
keywords learningoptionsreinforcementrewardinverseadversarialcomplexdemonstrations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning has shown promise in learning policies that can solve complex problems. However, manually specifying a good reward function can be difficult, especially for intricate tasks. Inverse reinforcement learning offers a useful paradigm to learn the underlying reward function directly from expert demonstrations. Yet in reality, the corpus of demonstrations may contain trajectories arising from a diverse set of underlying reward functions rather than a single one. Thus, in inverse reinforcement learning, it is useful to consider such a decomposition. The options framework in reinforcement learning is specifically designed to decompose policies in a similar light. We therefore extend the options framework and propose a method to simultaneously recover reward options in addition to policy options. We leverage adversarial methods to learn joint reward-policy options using only observed expert states. We show that this approach works well in both simple and complex continuous control tasks and shows significant performance increases in one-shot transfer learning.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Intention-Conditioned Flow Occupancy Models

    cs.LG 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    InFOM applies flow matching to model intention-conditioned occupancy measures for RL pre-training, reporting 1.8x median return gains and 36% higher success rates on benchmarks.