Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Satellite Imagery Feature Detection using Deep Convolutional Neural Network: A Kaggle Competition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1706.06169 v1 pith:BZI5NJQ5 submitted 2017-06-19 cs.CV

Satellite Imagery Feature Detection using Deep Convolutional Neural Network: A Kaggle Competition

classification cs.CV
keywords imagerysatellitefeatureapproachchallengeconvolutionaldatadetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper describes our approach to the DSTL Satellite Imagery Feature Detection challenge run by Kaggle. The primary goal of this challenge is accurate semantic segmentation of different classes in satellite imagery. Our approach is based on an adaptation of fully convolutional neural network for multispectral data processing. In addition, we defined several modifications to the training objective and overall training pipeline, e.g. boundary effect estimation, also we discuss usage of data augmentation strategies and reflectance indices. Our solution scored third place out of 419 entries. Its accuracy is comparable to the first two places, but unlike those solutions, it doesn't rely on complex ensembling techniques and thus can be easily scaled for deployment in production as a part of automatic feature labeling systems for satellite imagery analysis.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Flaws in the LLM Automation Narrative

    stat.OT 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new code-writing data analysis benchmark shows human experts outperforming a frontier LLM on average with lower performance variance.