Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1705.05085 v1 pith:VWUUHEEM submitted 2017-05-15 cs.LG stat.ML

Active Learning for Graph Embedding

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords graphembeddingnodedataqueryactivecriterialearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graph embedding provides an efficient solution for graph analysis by converting the graph into a low-dimensional space which preserves the structure information. In contrast to the graph structure data, the i.i.d. node embedding can be processed efficiently in terms of both time and space. Current semi-supervised graph embedding algorithms assume the labelled nodes are given, which may not be always true in the real world. While manually label all training data is inapplicable, how to select the subset of training data to label so as to maximize the graph analysis task performance is of great importance. This motivates our proposed active graph embedding (AGE) framework, in which we design a general active learning query strategy for any semi-supervised graph embedding algorithm. AGE selects the most informative nodes as the training labelled nodes based on the graphical information (i.e., node centrality) as well as the learnt node embedding (i.e., node classification uncertainty and node embedding representativeness). Different query criteria are combined with the time-sensitive parameters which shift the focus from graph based query criteria to embedding based criteria as the learning progresses. Experiments have been conducted on three public data sets and the results verified the effectiveness of each component of our query strategy and the power of combining them using time-sensitive parameters. Our code is available online at: https://github.com/vwz/AGE.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ALINC: Active Learning for Inductive Node Classification via Graph Sampling

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ALINC aggregates node-level active learning utilities to graph-level selection criteria and benchmarks ten strategies across three aggregation methods on four datasets, identifying CoreSet, TypiClust, and BADGE as top...

  2. Beyond the Golden Teacher: Enhancing Graph Learning through LLM-GNN Co-teaching

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Bidirectional LLM-GNN co-teaching with round-based pseudo-label preference optimization outperforms golden-teacher baselines on few-shot TAG benchmarks by 3-8% absolute gains.

  3. Where LLM Annotators Fail: Label-Free Learning on Graphs with LLMs

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CANE estimates cluster-specific reliability of noisy LLM pseudo-labels on graphs without ground truth to improve label-free node classification.

  4. Regional based query in graph active learning

    cs.LG 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proposes regional uncertainty and page-rank extended query selection for active learning on graphs, claiming superiority over standard methods at different labeling densities.