Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Where are chi_(cJ)(3P)?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1611.00109 v2 pith:S7JVHINW submitted 2016-11-01 hep-ph

Where are chi_(cJ)(3P)?

classification hep-ph
keywords statemassworkinvariantprocessrespectivelyspectrumaddition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the present work, we propose $Y(4140)$ as the $\chi_{c1}(3P)$ state by studying the $\chi_{c1} \pi^+ \pi^-$ invariant mass spectrum of the $B\to K \chi_{c1} \pi^+ \pi^-$ process. In the $D\bar{D}$ invariant mass spectrum of the $B\to K D\bar{D}$ process, we find a new resonance with the mass and width to be $ (4083.0 \pm 5.0) $ and $ (24.1 \pm 15.4) $ MeV, respectively, which could be a good candidate of the $\chi_{c0}(3P)$ state. The theoretical investigations on the decay behaviors of the $\chi_{cJ}(3P)$ in the present work support the assignments of the $Y(4140)$ and $Y(4080)$ as the $\chi_{c1}(3P)$ and $\chi_{c0}(3P)$ states, respectively. In addition, the $\chi_{c2}(3P)$ state is predicted to be a very narrow state. The results in the present work could be tested by further experiments in the LHCb and forthcoming Belle II.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Decoding the near-threshold $X_{0,\,1}(4140)$ and $X_{1}(4685)$ states via OZI-suppressed coupled-channel scattering

    hep-ph 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    X0(4140) is a dynamically generated J/psi phi pole with single-channel scattering length 1.11 fm; X1(4685) is interpreted as a psi(2S) phi hadronic molecule under heavy quark spin symmetry.

  2. Comparing relativistic and non-relativistic quark pair creation models

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Relativistic and non-relativistic QPC models produce strong decay width predictions of similar overall quality for light mesons, with the relativistic version exhibiting stronger suppression at high energies.