Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Non-stochastic Best Arm Identification and Hyperparameter Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1502.07943 v1 pith:LECQJMCI submitted 2015-02-27 cs.LG stat.ML

Non-stochastic Best Arm Identification and Hyperparameter Optimization

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords non-stochastichyperparameteridentificationbest-armoptimizationsettingalgorithmalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Motivated by the task of hyperparameter optimization, we introduce the non-stochastic best-arm identification problem. Within the multi-armed bandit literature, the cumulative regret objective enjoys algorithms and analyses for both the non-stochastic and stochastic settings while to the best of our knowledge, the best-arm identification framework has only been considered in the stochastic setting. We introduce the non-stochastic setting under this framework, identify a known algorithm that is well-suited for this setting, and analyze its behavior. Next, by leveraging the iterative nature of standard machine learning algorithms, we cast hyperparameter optimization as an instance of non-stochastic best-arm identification, and empirically evaluate our proposed algorithm on this task. Our empirical results show that, by allocating more resources to promising hyperparameter settings, we typically achieve comparable test accuracies an order of magnitude faster than baseline methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Learning What Evaluators Value: A Reliable Approach to Modeling Evaluator Preferences

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Presents a robust algorithm for learning any coordinate-wise non-decreasing evaluator preference function, with theoretical guarantees that it matches linear performance when linearity holds.