Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On generic parametrizations of spinning black-hole geometries

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1401.0528 v2 pith:WAINCJOC submitted 2014-01-02 gr-qc hep-th

On generic parametrizations of spinning black-hole geometries

classification gr-qc hep-th
keywords metricspinningblack-holegenericgeometriesproblemfactimportant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The construction of a generic parametrization of spinning geometries which can be matched continuously to the Kerr metric is an important open problem in General Relativity. Its resolution is more than of academic interest, as it allows to parametrize and quantify possible deviations from the no-hair theorem. Various approaches to the problem have been proposed, all with their own (severe) limitations. Here we discuss the metric recently proposed by Johannsen and Psaltis, showing that (i) the original metric describes only corrections that preserve the horizon area-mass relation of nonspinning geometries; (ii) this unnecessary restriction can be relaxed by introducing a new parameter that in fact dominates in both the post-Newtonian and strong-field regimes; (iii) within this framework, we construct the most generic spinning black-hole geometry which contains twice as many the (infinite) parameters of the original metric; (iv) in the strong-field regime, all parameters are roughly equally important. This fact introduces a severe degeneracy problem in the case of highly-spinning black holes. Finally, we prove that even our generalization fails to describe the few known spinning black-hole metrics in modified gravity.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.