Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Almost All of Kepler's Multiple Planet Candidates are Planets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1201.5424 v1 pith:45SFGA2C submitted 2012-01-26 astro-ph.EP

Almost All of Kepler's Multiple Planet Candidates are Planets

classification astro-ph.EP
keywords keplerplanetsstarcandidatesmultipleplanetsystemstransiting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a statistical analysis that demonstrates that the overwhelming majority of Kepler candidate multiple transiting systems (multis) indeed represent true, physically-associated transiting planets. Binary stars provide the primary source of false positives among Kepler planet candidates, implying that false positives should be nearly randomly-distributed among Kepler targets. In contrast, true transiting planets would appear clustered around a smaller number of Kepler targets if detectable planets tend to come in systems and/or if the orbital planes of planets encircling the same star are correlated. There are more than one hundred times as many Kepler planet candidates in multi-candidate systems as would be predicted from a random distribution of candidates, implying that the vast majority are true planets. Most of these multis are multiple planet systems orbiting the Kepler target star, but there are likely cases where (a) the planetary system orbits a fainter star, and the planets are thus significantly larger than has been estimated, or (b) the planets orbit different stars within a binary/multiple star system. We use the low overall false positive rate among Kepler multis, together with analysis of Kepler spacecraft and ground-based data, to validate the closely-packed Kepler-33 planetary system, which orbits a star that has evolved somewhat off of the main sequence. Kepler-33 hosts five transiting planets with periods ranging from 5.67 to 41 days.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ASTEP confirmation of a pair of long-period Jupiter-sized planets with extremely low densities transiting TOI-791

    astro-ph.EP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Two extremely low-density Jupiter-sized planets on long-period orbits around TOI-791 were confirmed via ground-based photometry and TTV-derived masses.

  2. Kepler Image-Subtracted Light Curves and Variable Star Catalog of NGC 6819

    astro-ph.SR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Kepler image-subtracted photometry yields 81,498 light curves and a catalog of 87 periodic variable candidates in NGC 6819, including 26 newly discovered ones.

  3. Kepler Image-Subtracted Light Curves and Variable Star Catalog of NGC 6819

    astro-ph.SR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Generates and publicly releases 81,498 detrended Kepler light curves plus a catalog of 87 periodic variables (26 new) in the 2.5 Gyr cluster NGC 6819 using Gaia DR3 for membership.

  4. Stellar Obliquities of Young Systems, Atmospheres Undergoing Contraction and Escape (SOYSAUCE) II: a 135 Myr planet on an aligned orbit with transit timing variations

    astro-ph.EP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Validation of a 135 Myr, 3.6 R_E transiting planet with aligned obliquity and TTV evidence for a near-resonant companion.

  5. Towards Instrument-Agnostic Exoplanet Candidate Prioritization

    astro-ph.EP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    An ensemble of machine learning models trained jointly on Kepler and TESS data provides instrument-agnostic prioritization of exoplanet candidates.