Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Linking halo mass to galaxy luminosity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0402500 v2 pith:5Y4UNM3J submitted 2004-02-20 astro-ph

Linking halo mass to galaxy luminosity

classification astro-ph
keywords massluminositygalaxyfunctionhalolightresultsdark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper we present a new, essentially empirical, model for the relation between the mass of a dark matter halo/subhalo and the luminosity of a galaxy hosted in it. To estimate this, we replace the assumption of linearity between light and mass fluctuations with the assumption of monotonicity between galaxy light and halo or subhalo mass. We are enabled to proceed with this less restrictive ansatz by the availability of new, very high resolution dark matter simulations and more detailed and comprehensive global galactic luminosity functions. We find that the relation between halo/subhalo mass and hosted galaxy luminosity is fairly well fit by a double power law, while that between halo mass and group luminosity is fairly well fit by a two branch function, with both branches double power laws. Both relations asymptote to $L\propto M^4$ at low $M$, while at high mass the former follows $L\propto M^{0.28}$ and the latter $L\propto M^{0.9}$. We also derive results for the occupation number, luminosity function of cluster galaxies, group luminosity function and multiplicity function. Then, using some additional assumptions, we further derive results for biasing between mass and light and mass and galaxy number, light distribution function and the void probability distribution. Our results for the most part seem to match well with observations and previous expectations. We feel this is a potentially powerful way of modelling this relation, since the main inputs are readily testable against dark matter simulation results and galaxy surveys. (abridged)

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Closing the Observational Gap in Cosmic Dynamics: AI-Enabled Reconstruction of the Universe's Vorticity and Rotational Flow Morphology

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AI trained on LambdaCDM simulations reconstructs the cosmic vorticity field from SDSS galaxies, revealing coherent vortical structures consistent with the standard model and correcting redshift-space distortions.

  2. Fast and accurate Gaia-unWISE quasar mock catalogs from LPT and Eulerian bias

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Generation of 100 full-sky quasar spectrophotometric mock catalogs using a hierarchical nonlocal nonlinear bias scheme on Augmented Lagrangian Perturbation Theory lightcone fields, calibrated to DESI data and includin...