Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Morphology of the supercluster-void network in LCDM cosmology

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0312110 v1 pith:DDGIHJ2I submitted 2003-12-03 astro-ph

Morphology of the supercluster-void network in LCDM cosmology

classification astro-ph
keywords voidsindividualsuperclustersdefineddensitylargestpropertiessupercluster
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We report here the first systematic study of the supercluster-void network in the LCDM concordance cosmology in which voids and superclusters are treated on an equal footing. Superclusters are defined as individual members of an over-dense excursion set and voids are defined as individual members of a complementary under-dense excursion set at the same density threshold. We determine the geometric, topological and morphological properties of the cosmic web at a large set of density levels by computing Minkowski functionals for every supercluster and void using SURFGEN. The properties of the largest (percolating) supercluster and the complementary void are found to be very different from properties of individual superclusters and voids. Individual superclusters totally occupy no more than about 5% of the total volume and contain no more than 20% of mass if the largest supercluster is excluded. Likewise, individual voids totally occupy no more than 14% of volume and contain no more than 4% of mass if the largest void is excluded. Although superclusters are more massive and voids are more voluminous the difference in maximum volumes is not greater than by an order of magnitude. The genus value of individual superclusters can be 5 while the genus of individual voids can reach 40, implying significant amount of substructure in superclusters and especially in voids. One of our main results is that large voids, as defined through the density field (read dark matter distribution) can be distinctly non-spherical.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.