Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 73 references

Giant planet atmospheres divide into three classes set by the balance of gas versus solid accretion during formation and migration.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-07-02 17:15 UTC pith:4P42XQ2R

load-bearing objection The paper runs coupled 1D disc and N-body simulations across chemical scenarios and grain sizes to produce a three-class taxonomy of giant-planet atmospheres defined by specific inequality patterns in N/O*, C/O*, C/N*, and S/N*. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2607.00092 v1 pith:4P42XQ2R submitted 2026-06-30 astro-ph.EP

Planet formation in chemically diverse and evolving discs II. Chemical fingerprints in planetary atmospheres

E. Pacetti , D. Turrini , E. Schisano , S. Molinari , C. Walsh , C. P. Dullemond , S. Fonte , R. S. Klessen
show 8 more authors
U. Lebreuilly P. Hennebelle S. L. Ivanovski R. Politi D. Polychroni P. Simonetti L. Testi V. Cottini
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords giant planetsprotoplanetary discsatmospheric compositionplanet formationelemental ratiosplanetary migrationaccretiondisc chemistry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models how viscous evolution, dust drift, and chemistry in protoplanetary discs set the elemental makeup of material accreted by growing giant planets. It couples one-dimensional disc calculations to N-body simulations of planetesimal scattering and migration to track carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, and sulphur delivery. This produces three distinct atmospheric classes defined by patterns in stellar-normalised ratios such as N/O*, C/O*, C/N*, and S/N*. The classes map directly to gas-dominated, planetesimal-dominated, and drift-enhanced accretion regimes. The resulting trends supply a predictive link between observed atmospheric spectra and the time-dependent properties of the natal disc.

Core claim

Giant-planet atmospheres fall into three classes tied to accretion regime. Gas-dominated cases show N/O* > C/O* > C/N* with near-stellar or substellar S/N* and C/S*. Planetesimal-dominated cases show N/O* < C/O* < C/N*, S/N* >= C/N*, and C/S* <= C/O*. Drift-enhanced cases show N/O* < C/O* < C/N* together with markedly superstellar volatile-to-refractory ratios. N/O*, C/N*, and S/N* change systematically with migration distance while C/O* stays largely insensitive; degeneracies appear for formation beyond the CO and N2 snowlines. Disc chemistry and grain size further modulate the volatile-ratio patterns within each class.

What carries the argument

Coupling of 1D viscously evolving disc models (with radial dust drift and volatile chemistry) to N-body simulations of planetesimals interacting with a growing and migrating giant planet.

Load-bearing premise

The one-dimensional disc models with dust drift and chemistry, when combined with N-body planetesimal tracking, correctly reproduce the time-dependent chemical composition of gas and solids that a planet accretes.

What would settle it

A survey of measured C/O*, N/O*, C/N*, and S/N* in a statistically significant sample of giant-planet atmospheres would fail to recover the three predicted ratio clusters if the classification does not hold.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • N/O*, C/N*, and S/N* vary systematically with the extent of planetary migration.
  • C/O* alone provides little information on the gas-to-solid accretion balance.
  • Metallicity does not uniquely indicate the solid-to-gas ratio in drift-dominated regimes.
  • Sulphur ratios supply an independent constraint that breaks some degeneracies between formation pathways.
  • Changes in disc chemical state or grain size produce distinctive volatile-ratio signatures within each atmospheric class.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Multi-element atmospheric measurements from JWST or Ariel could be inverted to estimate both the migration distance and the dominant grain size in the birth disc.
  • The framework implies that planets forming beyond the main snowlines may require additional tracers such as phosphorus or noble-gas abundances to resolve formation-location ambiguities.
  • If the three classes are confirmed, population-level statistics on atmospheric ratios could constrain the typical timing of giant-planet migration relative to disc dispersal.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript couples 1D viscously evolving protoplanetary disc models (including radial dust drift and volatile chemistry) with N-body simulations of planetesimal accretion onto a growing and migrating giant planet. Across four chemical scenarios and three grain sizes, it derives normalized elemental ratios (N/O*, C/O*, C/N*, S/N*, C/S*) and identifies three atmospheric classes tied to distinct accretion regimes: gas-dominated (N/O* > C/O* > C/N*, near-stellar C/S*), planetesimal-dominated (N/O* < C/O* < C/N*, S/N* >= C/N*, C/S* <= C/O*), and drift-enhanced (N/O* < C/O* < C/N* with superstellar volatile-to-refractory ratios). The work examines systematic variations with migration extent and disc parameters while noting degeneracies beyond certain snowlines.

Significance. If the reported class distinctions hold under the modeled conditions, the multi-element ratio framework supplies concrete, simulation-derived diagnostics that link atmospheric compositions to formation pathways and natal disc properties. This goes beyond single-ratio metrics such as C/O and supplies testable trends for JWST and Ariel spectra, with explicit accounting for time-dependent chemistry and parameter degeneracies.

major comments (1)
  1. [Methods and Results] The central claim that the three classes emerge from the simulations rests on the coupling of 1D disc models to N-body accretion; the manuscript should quantify the sensitivity of the reported ratio orderings to this coupling (e.g., by comparing runs with and without radial drift or with varied initial chemical abundances) to demonstrate that the class boundaries are not artifacts of the 1D approximation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the class characteristics but supplies no example numerical ratio values or overlap metrics; adding a compact table of median ratios (with ranges) for each class across the four scenarios would allow readers to assess the distinctness of the patterns directly.
  2. [Introduction or Results] Notation for stellar-normalized ratios is introduced with an asterisk but the precise definition (e.g., whether it is log or linear) should be restated once in the main text near the first results figure for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comment on robustness. We address the major point below and will incorporate clarifications in a revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods and Results] The central claim that the three classes emerge from the simulations rests on the coupling of 1D disc models to N-body accretion; the manuscript should quantify the sensitivity of the reported ratio orderings to this coupling (e.g., by comparing runs with and without radial drift or with varied initial chemical abundances) to demonstrate that the class boundaries are not artifacts of the 1D approximation.

    Authors: The manuscript already varies initial chemical abundances across four scenarios and modulates radial drift via three grain sizes (0.1, 20, and 100 micron), with the latter directly controlling drift velocities. The reported ratio orderings and three atmospheric classes remain consistent across this full grid, providing evidence that the distinctions are not artifacts of any single parameter choice. We did not run cases with radial drift disabled, as the model framework incorporates it as a core process; however, the grain-size variations serve as a controlled test of drift strength. We will add a short discussion paragraph noting this robustness while acknowledging that full 2D/3D disc models could provide further validation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in simulation-based classification

full rationale

The paper derives its three atmospheric classes directly as outputs from forward simulations that couple 1D viscously evolving disc models (with radial drift and chemistry) to N-body planetesimal accretion tracking. Elemental ratios such as N/O*, C/O*, C/N*, S/N* and C/S* are computed from the simulated accretion histories across four chemical scenarios and three grain sizes; the classes are then identified by inspecting the resulting patterns. No parameters are fitted to data, no equations reduce by construction to their own inputs, and no load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems are invoked. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained within the described numerical framework.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions from protoplanetary disc theory and planet formation simulations; the explored grain sizes and chemical scenarios function as varied inputs rather than fitted free parameters, and no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • grain size
    Three discrete representative values (0.1, 20, 100 micron) are chosen as inputs to the dust-drift and chemistry modules.
  • chemical scenario
    Four distinct chemical scenarios are chosen as inputs to represent different disc chemical states.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Viscous evolution governs the radial transport of gas and dust in the disc
    Invoked by the 1D disc models described in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Volatile chemistry sets the partitioning of C, O, N, and S between gas and solids at different disc radii
    Incorporated in the disc models as stated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption N-body dynamics accurately capture planetesimal accretion onto a migrating giant planet
    Used in the coupled simulations described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5953 in / 1770 out tokens · 50035 ms · 2026-07-02T17:15:08.617552+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Giant planets form in protoplanetary discs, where the coupled dynamical and chemical evolution of gas and solids determines the composition of the material they accrete. We investigate how planet formation and migration shape the primordial elemental makeup of giant-planet atmospheres. Our aim is to link atmospheric compositions to planets' formation pathways and the time-dependent chemical properties of their natal discs. We couple 1D models of viscously evolving discs - incorporating radial dust drift and volatile chemistry - with N-body simulations of planetesimals interacting with a growing and migrating giant planet. Four chemical scenarios and three representative grain sizes (0.1, 20, and 100 micron) are explored. We track the accretion of carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, and sulphur to derive atmospheric elemental ratios normalised to stellar values (* denotes stellar normalisation). We identify three atmospheric classes corresponding to distinct accretion regimes: gas-dominated, characterised by N/O* > C/O* > C/N* and unconstrained or substellar S/N* (near-stellar C/S*); planetesimal-dominated, showing N/O* < C/O* < C/N*, S/N* >= C/N*, and C/S* <= C/O*; and drift-enhanced, exhibiting N/O* < C/O* < C/N* and markedly superstellar volatile-to-refractory ratios. N/O*, C/N*, and S/N* vary systematically with migration extent, although degeneracies arise for planets forming beyond the CO and N2 snowlines; C/O* remains largely insensitive. Metallicity alone does not uniquely trace the solid-to-gas accretion balance in drift-dominated regimes. Variations in the disc's chemical state and dust size imprint distinctive volatile-ratio patterns across these classes, providing complementary constraints on disc properties. This multi-element framework establishes predictive trends to guide the interpretation of atmospheric spectra from facilities like JWST and Ariel.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00092 by C. P. Dullemond, C. Walsh, D. Polychroni, D. Turrini, E. Pacetti, E. Schisano, L. Testi, P. Hennebelle, P. Simonetti, R. Politi, R. S. Klessen, S. Fonte, S. L. Ivanovski, S. Molinari, U. Lebreuilly, V. Cottini.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Pairwise comparisons of volatile elemental ratios in the primordial atmospheres of the six simulated giant planets. Each panel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Elemental ratios in the primordial atmospheres of the six simulated giant planets as a function of their initial orbital positions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Envelope compositions obtained in this study. The table reports, for each atmospheric class, the identifying compositional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Top: Mass of heavy elements, defined as all elements heavier than H and He, contained in the primordial envelopes of giant planets accreting both gas and planetesimals and ex￾pressed in Earth masses, for the six simulated migration scenar￾ios in the high-ionisation reset scenario of the disc. The shown masses refer only to the envelope composition under the assump￾tion of homogeneous mixing and do not incl… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: compares the results of this work for discs with 0.1 µm￾sized grains with those of Pacetti et al. (2022). Both studies investigate the same disc chemical scenarios. In Pacetti et al. (2022), the disc was assumed to be stationary, with abundances set by 1 Myr of chemical evolution based on the same chemical network implemented in JADE, but without concurrent gas or dust transport (Eistrup et al. 2016, 2018)… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2001, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 185, 49

    Allègre, C., Manhès, G., & Lewin, É. 2001, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 185, 49

    2001

  2. [2]

    M., & Grevesse, N

    Asplund, M., Amarsi, A. M., & Grevesse, N. 2021, A&A, 653, A141

    2021

  3. [3]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol

    Bae, J., Isella, A., Zhu, Z., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y . Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 423

    2023

  4. [4]

    2017, MNRAS, 469, S712

    Bardyn, A., Baklouti, D., Cottin, H., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, S712

    2017

  5. [5]

    Bate, M. R. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 2145

    2022

  6. [6]

    A., Blake, G

    Bergin, E. A., Blake, G. A., Ciesla, F., Hirschmann, M. M., & Li, J. 2015, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Science, 112, 8965 Bernabò, L. M., Turrini, D., Testi, L., Marzari, F., & Polychroni, D. 2022, ApJ, 927, L22

    2015

  7. [7]

    P., & Brauer, F

    Birnstiel, T., Dullemond, C. P., & Brauer, F. 2010, A&A, 513, A79

    2010

  8. [8]

    2015, A&A, 582, A112

    Bitsch, B., Lambrechts, M., & Johansen, A. 2015, A&A, 582, A112

    2015

  9. [9]

    D., & Kreidberg, L

    Bitsch, B., Schneider, A. D., & Kreidberg, L. 2022, A&A, 665, A138

    2022

  10. [10]

    C., Savage, B

    Bohlin, R. C., Savage, B. D., & Drake, J. F. 1978, ApJ, 224, 132

    1978

  11. [11]

    C., Wang, J., et al

    Bonidie, V ., Johnson, M. C., Wang, J., et al. 2026, AJ, 171, 34

    2026

  12. [12]

    A., Clarke, C

    Booth, R. A., Clarke, C. J., Madhusudhan, N., & Ilee, J. D. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 3994

    2017

  13. [13]

    Booth, R. A. & Ilee, J. D. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 3998

    2019

  14. [14]

    & Mordasini, C

    Burn, R. & Mordasini, C. 2025, Planetary Population Synthesis, ed. H. J. Deeg & J. A. Belmonte (Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland), 1–60

    2025

  15. [15]

    A., Lothringer, J., & Blake, G

    Chachan, Y ., Knutson, H. A., Lothringer, J., & Blake, G. A. 2023, ApJ, 943, 112

    2023

  16. [16]

    Chambers, J. E. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 793

    1999

  17. [17]

    Chiang, E. I. & Goldreich, P. 1997, ApJ, 490, 368

    1997

  18. [18]

    J., Eistrup, C., & van Dishoeck, E

    Cridland, A. J., Eistrup, C., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2019, A&A, 627, A127

    2019

  19. [19]

    J., Pudritz, R

    Cridland, A. J., Pudritz, R. E., Birnstiel, T., Cleeves, L. I., & Bergin, E. A. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 3910

    2017

  20. [20]

    J., van Dishoeck, E

    Cridland, A. J., van Dishoeck, E. F., Alessi, M., & Pudritz, R. E. 2020, A&A, 642, A229

    2020

  21. [21]

    Crossfield, I. J. M. 2023, ApJ, 952, L18

    2023

  22. [22]

    Cuzzi, J. N. & Zahnle, K. J. 2004, ApJ, 614, 490

    2004

  23. [23]

    2023, A&A, 679, L7

    Danti, C., Bitsch, B., & Mah, J. 2023, A&A, 679, L7

    2023

  24. [24]

    Dawson, R. I. & Johnson, J. A. 2018, ARA&A, 56, 175 Dr˛ a˙ zkowska, J., Alibert, Y ., & Moore, B. 2016, A&A, 594, A105

    2018

  25. [25]

    P., Dominik, C., & Natta, A

    Dullemond, C. P., Dominik, C., & Natta, A. 2001, ApJ, 560, 957

    2001

  26. [26]

    Eistrup, C., Walsh, C., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2016, A&A, 595, A83

    2016

  27. [27]

    Eistrup, C., Walsh, C., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2018, A&A, 613, A14

    2018

  28. [28]

    2021, A&A, 656, A69

    Emsenhuber, A., Mordasini, C., Burn, R., et al. 2021, A&A, 656, A69

    2021

  29. [29]

    D., Booth, R

    Feinstein, A. D., Booth, R. A., Bergner, J. B., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.00669

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    D., Radica, M., Welbanks, L., et al

    Feinstein, A. D., Radica, M., Welbanks, L., et al. 2023, Nature, 614, 670

    2023

  31. [31]

    Fortier, A., Alibert, Y ., Carron, F., Benz, W., & Dittkrist, K. M. 2013, A&A, 549, A44

    2013

  32. [32]

    Hahn, J. M. & Malhotra, R. 2005, AJ, 130, 2392

    2005

  33. [33]

    1981, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 70, 35

    Hayashi, C. 1981, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 70, 35

    1981

  34. [34]

    2016, Phys

    Isella, A., Guidi, G., Testi, L., et al. 2016, Phys. Rev. Lett., 117, 251101

    2016

  35. [35]

    & Lambrechts, M

    Johansen, A. & Lambrechts, M. 2017, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 45, 359

    2017

  36. [36]

    S., et al

    Kama, M., Shorttle, O., Jermyn, A. S., et al. 2019, ApJ, 885, 114

    2019

  37. [37]

    & Schreiber, A

    Klahr, H. & Schreiber, A. 2016, in IAU Symposium, V ol. 318, Asteroids: New

    2016

  38. [38]

    & Johansen, A

    Lambrechts, M. & Johansen, A. 2012, A&A, 544, A32 Le Gal, R., Öberg, K. I., Teague, R., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 12

    2012

  39. [39]

    2023, MNRAS, 518, 3326

    Lebreuilly, U., Vallucci-Goy, V ., Guillet, V ., Lombart, M., & Marchand, P. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 3326

    2023

  40. [40]

    K., Nakajima, M., & Fischer, R

    Lichtenberg, T., Schaefer, L. K., Nakajima, M., & Fischer, R. A. 2023, in As- tronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y . Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 907

    2023

  41. [41]

    J., Hubickyj, O., D’Angelo, G., & Bodenheimer, P

    Lissauer, J. J., Hubickyj, O., D’Angelo, G., & Bodenheimer, P. 2009, Icarus, 199, 338

    2009

  42. [42]

    2010, in Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, V ol

    Lodders, K. 2010, in Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, V ol. 16, Prin- ciples and Perspectives in Cosmochemistry, 379

    2010

  43. [43]

    & Fegley, B

    Lodders, K. & Fegley, B. 2002, Icarus, 155, 393

    2002

  44. [44]

    & Pringle, J

    Lynden-Bell, D. & Pringle, J. E. 1974, MNRAS, 168, 603

    1974

  45. [45]

    MacDonald, R. J. & Madhusudhan, N. 2017, ApJ, 850, L15

    2017

  46. [46]

    B., et al

    Madhusudhan, N., Harrington, J., Stevenson, K. B., et al. 2011, Nature, 469, 64

    2011

  47. [47]

    2023, A&A, 677, L7

    Mah, J., Bitsch, B., Pascucci, I., & Henning, T. 2023, A&A, 677, L7

    2023

  48. [48]

    M., & Guillet, V

    Marchand, P., Lebreuilly, U., Mac Low, M. M., & Guillet, V . 2023, A&A, 670, A61 Mollière, P., Molyarova, T., Bitsch, B., et al. 2022, ApJ, 934, 74

    2023

  49. [49]

    & Burn, R

    Mordasini, C. & Burn, R. 2024, Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 90, 55

    2024

  50. [50]

    M., Jin, S., & Alibert, Y

    Mordasini, C., Mollière, P., Dittkrist, K. M., Jin, S., & Alibert, Y . 2015, Interna- tional Journal of Astrobiology, 14, 201

    2015

  51. [51]

    2016, ApJ, 832, 41

    Mordasini, C., van Boekel, R., Mollière, P., Henning, T., & Benneke, B. 2016, ApJ, 832, 41

    2016

  52. [52]

    & Nakagawa, Y

    Nakamoto, T. & Nakagawa, Y . 1994, ApJ, 421, 640

    1994

  53. [53]

    & Ohno, K

    Nakazawa, K. & Ohno, K. 2026, ApJ, 999, 130 Öberg, K. I. & Bergin, E. A. 2016, ApJ, 831, L19 Öberg, K. I., Murray-Clay, R., & Bergin, E. A. 2011, ApJ, 743, L16 Öberg, K. I. & Wordsworth, R. 2019, AJ, 158, 194

    2026

  54. [54]

    & Fortney, J

    Ohno, K. & Fortney, J. J. 2023, ApJ, 956, 125

    2023

  55. [55]

    2025, A&A, 701, A194

    Pacetti, E., Schisano, E., Turrini, D., et al. 2025, A&A, 701, A194

    2025

  56. [56]

    2022, ApJ, 937, 36

    Pacetti, E., Turrini, D., Schisano, E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 937, 36

    2022

  57. [57]

    2014, in Planets, Asteriods, Comets and The Solar System, ed

    Palme, H., Lodders, K., & Jones, A. 2014, in Planets, Asteriods, Comets and The Solar System, ed. A. M. Davis, V ol. 2, 15–36

    2014

  58. [58]

    J., & Turrini, D

    Pirani, S., Johansen, A., Bitsch, B., Mustill, A. J., & Turrini, D. 2019, A&A, 623, A169

    2019

  59. [59]

    B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., et al

    Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., et al. 1996, Icarus, 124, 62

    1996

  60. [60]

    K., Mukherjee, S., et al

    Rustamkulov, Z., Sing, D. K., Mukherjee, S., et al. 2023, Nature, 614, 659

    2023

  61. [61]

    Shakura, N. I. & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337

    1973

  62. [62]

    & Turrini, D

    Sirono, S.-i. & Turrini, D. 2025, Scientific Reports, 15, 30919

    2025

  63. [63]

    2018, Experimental Astronomy, 46, 135

    Tinetti, G., Drossart, P., Eccleston, P., et al. 2018, Experimental Astronomy, 46, 135

    2018

  64. [64]

    Tsai, S.-M., Lee, E. K. H., Powell, D., et al. 2023, Nature, 617, 483

    2023

  65. [65]

    2023, The Compositional Dimension of Planet Formation, ed

    Turrini, D. 2023, The Compositional Dimension of Planet Formation, ed. L. M. Lara & D. Jewitt (World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd), 1–47

    2023

  66. [66]

    2022, Experimental Astronomy, 53, 225

    Turrini, D., Codella, C., Danielski, C., et al. 2022, Experimental Astronomy, 53, 225

    2022

  67. [67]

    2026, Astronomy and Computing, 55, 101064

    Turrini, D., Fonte, S., Politi, R., et al. 2026, Astronomy and Computing, 55, 101064

    2026

  68. [68]

    2019, ApJ, 877, 50

    Turrini, D., Marzari, F., Polychroni, D., & Testi, L. 2019, ApJ, 877, 50

    2019

  69. [69]

    2021, ApJ, 909, 40

    Turrini, D., Schisano, E., Fonte, S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 909, 40

    2021

  70. [70]

    2024, A&A, 690, A23 V orobyov, E

    Vallucci-Goy, V ., Lebreuilly, U., & Hennebelle, P. 2024, A&A, 690, A23 V orobyov, E. I., Elbakyan, V . G., Johansen, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 670, A81

    2024

  71. [71]

    2015, A&A, 582, A88

    Walsh, C., Nomura, H., & van Dishoeck, E. 2015, A&A, 582, A88

    2015

  72. [72]

    J., Morbidelli, A., Raymond, S

    Walsh, K. J., Morbidelli, A., Raymond, S. N., O’Brien, D. P., & Mandell, A. M. 2011, Nature, 475, 206

    2011

  73. [73]

    Winn, J. N. & Fabrycky, D. C. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 409 Article number, page 14 of 20 E. Pacetti et al.: Planet formation in chemically diverse and evolving discs Fig. A.1: Gas-phase elemental abundances of C (top row), O (middle row), and N (bottom row) in the natal disc as a function of radius and time. All abundances are normalised to their respective stell...

    2015