Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 83 references

Infalling gas and stellar flybys reshape resonant disk-planet systems by exciting eccentric dust structures and altering planetary accretion rates.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-26 13:21 UTC pith:U2OPJROA

load-bearing objection The runs show that cloudlet infall and flybys can excite eccentric multi-ring dust and shift accretion rates in a 2:1 resonant pair, but the link to narrow gas-free debris disks is not simulated. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.21533 v2 pith:U2OPJROA submitted 2026-06-19 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

Environmental interactions in Class II systems and their impact on the disk-planet architecture

Pedro P. Poblete , Nicol\'as Cuello , Tim D. Pearce , Antoine Alaguero , Josh Calcino , Daniel J. Price , Michael Kuffmeier This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR
keywords protoplanetary disksClass II systemsstellar flybysgas infalldust dynamicsplanetary accretionmean-motion resonanceenvironmental interactions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper runs 3D smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations of a Class II disk containing two planets in 2:1 resonance, then subjects the system to either an infalling gaseous cloudlet or a stellar flyby. Infall adds mass and angular momentum that stirs the dust into eccentric multi-ring patterns and boosts the inner planet's accretion, while the flyby truncates the outer disk and drives episodic inward dust migration that can enhance solid accretion onto both planets. These external events leave dynamical imprints such as eccentric narrow debris disks that could survive into later stages. A reader cares because most stars form in clusters where such interactions are frequent, so they help explain the diversity of observed disk shapes and planet properties.

Core claim

Environmental interactions during the Class II phase reshape disk-planet systems. Infall events increase disk mass and angular momentum, dynamically exciting the dust and producing eccentric multi-ring dust structures, while stellar flybys truncate the disk, compact the dust radially, and enhance episodic radial migration. Both processes excite eccentricity in gas and dust, leading to distinct accretion pathways, with the flyby promoting inward dust migration that may enhance solid accretion and infall preferentially increasing the accretion rate of the inner planet. In particular, infall can lead to the formation of eccentric narrow debris disks whose dynamical signatures may persist into l

What carries the argument

3D SPH simulations of a two-planet disk in 2:1 mean-motion resonance, with multiple dust species treated as particles including back-reaction on the gas, subjected to an infalling cloudlet or stellar flyby perturbation.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen initial disk mass, planet masses and resonance, cloudlet and flyby parameters, and the dust-as-particles treatment with back-reaction are representative of real Class II systems and capture the dominant physics over the simulated timescales.

What would settle it

High-resolution observations of a young system showing recent gas infall yet only circular, non-eccentric dust structures would falsify the claim that infall produces eccentric narrow debris disks.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Infall increases disk mass and angular momentum, producing eccentric multi-ring dust structures.
  • Stellar flybys truncate the disk radially and promote inward dust migration that can enhance solid accretion onto planets.
  • Infall preferentially increases the accretion rate onto the inner planet while flybys affect both planets through enhanced migration.
  • Dynamical signatures from these interactions, such as eccentric narrow debris disks, may persist into later evolutionary stages.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Eccentric debris disks observed around mature stars could frequently trace back to late infall events during the Class II phase rather than internal planet-disk interactions alone.
  • Planets forming in dense clusters may end up with systematically different solid compositions than those in isolated regions because of varying infall and flyby histories.
  • Future ALMA or JWST maps of young disks could search for truncated or multi-ring eccentric patterns as indirect evidence of past environmental perturbations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports 3D Phantom SPH simulations of a Class II protoplanetary disk hosting two planets in 2:1 mean-motion resonance. The disk is subjected to either an infalling gaseous cloudlet or a stellar flyby, with dust modeled as multiple particle species including back-reaction on the gas. The simulations show that infall increases disk mass and angular momentum, exciting eccentric multi-ring dust structures, while the flyby truncates the disk and promotes inward dust migration. These perturbations lead to distinct planetary accretion pathways, with the authors concluding that environmental interactions reshape disk-planet systems and that infall can produce eccentric narrow debris disks whose signatures may persist.

Significance. If the central numerical results hold under broader conditions, the work would demonstrate that late environmental perturbations during the Class II phase can alter disk morphology, dust dynamics, and planet growth, offering a pathway to explain eccentric debris disks and varied exoplanet architectures. The inclusion of dust back-reaction and multiple species strengthens the modeling relative to simpler treatments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that 'infall events can lead to the formation of eccentric, narrow debris disks' extrapolates beyond the reported simulations, which are performed only in the gas-rich Class II phase using Phantom SPH with dust particles and back-reaction. No gas-dispersal evolution is presented, leaving the transition from the simulated eccentric multi-ring gas+dust structures to a narrow gas-free debris disk untested and the morphology's survival unquantified.
  2. Results section (inferred from abstract and methods description): All outcomes rest on a single set of initial conditions (disk mass, planet masses, 2:1 resonance, cloudlet properties, flyby parameters) without reported parameter sweeps, variations, or convergence tests. This makes the robustness of the claimed changes in disk structure, eccentricity excitation, and differential accretion rates unclear and limits the strength of the general conclusions about environmental impacts.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and main text provide only qualitative descriptions of outcomes (e.g., 'increases the accretion rate') without quantitative values, error estimates, or time-averaged metrics for accretion rates or eccentricities.
  2. Figure captions and text should explicitly state the simulation duration relative to the Class II lifetime and the exact timing of the perturbations to allow readers to assess the evolutionary stage.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments, which have helped clarify the scope and limitations of our work. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that 'infall events can lead to the formation of eccentric, narrow debris disks' extrapolates beyond the reported simulations, which are performed only in the gas-rich Class II phase using Phantom SPH with dust particles and back-reaction. No gas-dispersal evolution is presented, leaving the transition from the simulated eccentric multi-ring gas+dust structures to a narrow gas-free debris disk untested and the morphology's survival unquantified.

    Authors: We agree that the simulations are confined to the gas-rich Class II phase and do not include explicit modeling of gas dispersal or the subsequent evolution into a debris disk. The abstract statement was meant to highlight a plausible long-term implication of the eccentric multi-ring dust structures we observe. To address the concern directly, we will revise the abstract (and the final sentence of the conclusions) to read: 'infall events can excite eccentric multi-ring dust structures whose dynamical signatures may persist as eccentric narrow debris disks after gas dispersal.' This change removes the implication of a direct formation pathway while retaining the physical motivation from our results. revision_made = yes revision: yes

  2. Referee: [—] Results section (inferred from abstract and methods description): All outcomes rest on a single set of initial conditions (disk mass, planet masses, 2:1 resonance, cloudlet properties, flyby parameters) without reported parameter sweeps, variations, or convergence tests. This makes the robustness of the claimed changes in disk structure, eccentricity excitation, and differential accretion rates unclear and limits the strength of the general conclusions about environmental impacts.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the presented results are for one specific set of initial conditions. These were selected to isolate the effects of environmental perturbations on a representative 2:1 resonant Class II system with dust back-reaction. Full parameter explorations are computationally prohibitive for 3D SPH runs with multiple dust species. We will add an explicit limitations paragraph in the discussion section noting that the reported mechanisms (eccentricity excitation, differential accretion, inward dust migration) are demonstrated for this configuration and that broader surveys are needed to quantify how outcomes scale with disk mass, planet mass ratio, or perturbation strength. The conclusions will be rephrased to emphasize that environmental interactions 'can' produce these effects rather than claiming they are universal. revision_made = partial revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct outputs of specified numerical experiments

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes from 3D Phantom SPH simulations with explicit initial conditions (2:1 resonant planets, cloudlet infall, flyby parameters), dust-as-particles treatment, and back-reaction. No analytical derivation chain, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation load-bearing steps exist. Claims follow directly from the described runs without reduction to inputs by construction. The extrapolation concern (gas-rich to gas-free debris disk) is an assumption about unmodeled evolution, not a circularity in the reported results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. All quantitative outcomes depend on unstated choices for disk mass, planet masses, viscosity, dust sizes, cloudlet mass and trajectory, and flyby impact parameter.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5868 in / 1252 out tokens · 14181 ms · 2026-06-26T13:21:40.720730+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Protoplanetary disks evolve in clustered environments where interactions with nearby stars and interstellar gas are common. Such environmental processes, including stellar flybys and gas infall, can significantly perturb disk structures over the disk lifetime and potentially influence the evolution of embedded planets. We investigate how environmental interactions affect the architecture of Class II systems that host both a disk and already-formed planets, and assess their impact on disk structure and dynamics, as well as planetary evolution. We performed 3D simulations using the Phantom SPH code, including multiple dust species treated with a dust-as-particles approach that accounts for dust back-reaction on the gas. We modeled a disk hosting two planets in a 2:1 mean-motion resonance and subjected the system to two types of perturbations: an infalling gaseous cloudlet and a stellar flyby. Infall and flyby perturbations change the disk morphology and dynamical state. Infalling gas increases the disk mass and angular momentum, dynamically exciting the dust and producing eccentric, multi-ring dust structures. The stellar flyby truncates the disk, compacting the dust distribution radially and enhancing episodic radial migration of dust grains. These processes excite eccentricity in both gas and dust, leading to distinct accretion pathways for the planets. In particular, the flyby promotes inward dust migration, which may enhance solid accretion onto the planets, while infall preferentially increases the accretion rate of the inner planet. Environmental interactions during the Class II phase can reshape disk-planet systems, imprinting dynamical signatures that may persist into later evolutionary stages. Both late infall and stellar flybys influence the growth and composition of planets; in particular, infall events can lead to the formation of eccentric, narrow debris disks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.21533 by Antoine Alaguero, Daniel J. Price, Josh Calcino, Michael Kuffmeier, Nicol\'as Cuello, Pedro P. Poblete, Tim D. Pearce.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Gas and dust surface density distributions at 300 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Azimuthally averaged gas surface density profiles for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dust surface density after 300 Tout for the Isolated case. The first panel shows the combined contribution from all grain sizes (“all grains”), as also shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Same as Figure 4 but for the Infall case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same as Figures 4 and5 but for the Flyby case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Evolution of the median eccentricity and longitude of pericentre of SPH dust and gas particles within 80–150 au. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Final distribution in the hk-plane for the dust grains with the highest Stokes number (i.e. s = 1.58 mm) in all simulated cases. The color coding is the same as in Figs. 2, and 3. The col￾ored circles indicate the median eccentricity of each distribution, while the centroids are marked by thicker points [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references

  1. [1]

    2025, A&A, 703, A210 ALMA Partnership, Brogan, C

    Alaguero, A., Ménard, F., Cuello, N., et al. 2025, A&A, 703, A210 ALMA Partnership, Brogan, C. L., Pérez, L. M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 808, L3

    2025

  2. [2]

    Andrews, S. M. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 483

    2020

  3. [3]

    M., Wilner, D

    Andrews, S. M., Wilner, D. J., Hughes, A. M., Qi, C., & Dullemond, C. P. 2009, ApJ, 700, 1502

    2009

  4. [4]

    Armitage, P. J. 2018, in Handbook of Exoplanets, ed. H. J. Deeg & J. A. Bel- monte, 135

    2018

  5. [5]

    Armitage, P. J. 2020, Astrophysics of planet formation, Second Edition

    2020

  6. [6]

    2019, ApJ, 884, L41

    Bae, J., Zhu, Z., Baruteau, C., et al. 2019, ApJ, 884, L41

    2019

  7. [7]

    R., Bonnell, I

    Bate, M. R., Bonnell, I. A., & Bromm, V . 2003, MNRAS, 339, 577

    2003

  8. [8]

    R., Bonnell, I

    Bate, M. R., Bonnell, I. A., & Price, N. M. 1995, MNRAS, 277, 362

    1995

  9. [9]

    2016, Space Sci

    Birnstiel, T., Fang, M., & Johansen, A. 2016, Space Sci. Rev., 205, 41

    2016

  10. [10]

    Bonnell, I. A. 1994, MNRAS, 269, 837

    1994

  11. [11]

    J., Hilder, T., et al

    Calcino, J., Price, D. J., Hilder, T., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 2695

    2025

  12. [12]

    Chambers, J. E. 2001, Icarus, 152, 205

    2001

  13. [13]

    2025, A&A, 696, A175

    Charalambous, C., Cuello, N., & Petrovich, C. 2025, A&A, 696, A175

    2025

  14. [14]

    A., Ruíz-Rodríguez, D., Hales, A., et al

    Cieza, L. A., Ruíz-Rodríguez, D., Hales, A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 698

    2019

  15. [15]

    Clarke, C. J. & Pringle, J. E. 1993, MNRAS, 261, 190

    1993

  16. [16]

    2019, MNRAS, 483, 4114

    Cuello, N., Dipierro, G., Mentiplay, D., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 4114

    2019

  17. [17]

    Cuello, N., Ménard, F., & Price, D. J. 2023, European Physical Journal Plus, 138, 11

    2023

  18. [18]

    2015, MNRAS, 453, L73

    Dipierro, G., Price, D., Laibe, G., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, L73

    2015

  19. [19]

    P., Küffmeier, M., Goicovic, F., et al

    Dullemond, C. P., Küffmeier, M., Goicovic, F., et al. 2019, A&A, 628, A20

    2019

  20. [20]

    M., Stutz, A

    Dunham, M. M., Stutz, A. M., Allen, L. E., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther, R. S. Klessen, C. P. Dullemond, & T. Henning, 195–218

    2014

  21. [21]

    A., Hillenbrand, L

    Eisner, J. A., Hillenbrand, L. A., White, R. J., Akeson, R. L., & Sargent, A. I. 2005, ApJ, 623, 952

    2005

  22. [22]

    M., Kalas, P., Fitzgerald, M

    Esposito, T. M., Kalas, P., Fitzgerald, M. P., et al. 2020, AJ, 160, 24

    2020

  23. [23]

    2014, A&A, 563, A72

    Faramaz, V ., Beust, H., Thébault, P., et al. 2014, A&A, 563, A72

    2014

  24. [24]

    R., et al

    Faramaz, V ., Krist, J., Stapelfeldt, K. R., et al. 2019, AJ, 158, 162

    2019

  25. [25]

    2021, A&A, 651, A90

    Fedele, D., Toci, C., Maud, L., & Lodato, G. 2021, A&A, 651, A90

    2021

  26. [26]

    Fouchet, L., Gonzalez, J.-F., & Maddison, S. T. 2010, A&A, 518, A16

    2010

  27. [27]

    2008, ApJS, 176, 184

    Furlan, E., McClure, M., Calvet, N., et al. 2008, ApJS, 176, 184

    2008

  28. [28]

    2026, A&A, 709, A269

    Garufi, A., Ginski, C., Benisty, M., et al. 2026, A&A, 709, A269

    2026

  29. [29]

    G., et al

    Garufi, A., Ginski, C., van Holstein, R. G., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A53 González-Ruilova, C., Cieza, L. A., Hales, A. S., et al. 2020, ApJ, 902, L33

    2024

  30. [30]

    Y ., Bohn, A

    Haffert, S. Y ., Bohn, A. J., de Boer, J., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 749

    2019

  31. [31]

    2026, A&A, 705, A196

    Han, Y ., Mansell, E., Jennings, J., et al. 2026, A&A, 705, A196

    2026

  32. [32]

    2016, ARA&A, 54, 135

    Hartmann, L., Herczeg, G., & Calvet, N. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 135

    2016

  33. [33]

    M., Duchêne, G., & Matthews, B

    Hughes, A. M., Duchêne, G., & Matthews, B. C. 2018, ARA&A, 56, 541 Hühn, L.-A., Dullemond, C. P., Lebreuilly, U., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A162

    2018

  34. [34]

    Hurt, S. A. & MacGregor, M. A. 2023, ApJ, 954, 10

    2023

  35. [35]

    Kennedy, G. M. 2020, Royal Society Open Science, 7, 200063

    2020

  36. [36]

    2018, A&A, 617, A44

    Keppler, M., Benisty, M., Müller, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 617, A44

    2018

  37. [37]

    2019, A&A, 625, A118

    Keppler, M., Teague, R., Bae, J., et al. 2019, A&A, 625, A118

    2019

  38. [38]

    P., Reissl, S., & Goicovic, F

    Kuffmeier, M., Dullemond, C. P., Reissl, S., & Goicovic, F. G. 2021, A&A, 656, A161

    2021

  39. [39]

    G., & Dullemond, C

    Kuffmeier, M., Goicovic, F. G., & Dullemond, C. P. 2020, A&A, 633, A3

    2020

  40. [40]

    S., & Haugbølle, T

    Kuffmeier, M., Jensen, S. S., & Haugbølle, T. 2023, European Physical Journal Plus, 138, 272

    2023

  41. [41]

    E., Segura-Cox, D., & Haugbølle, T

    Kuffmeier, M., Pineda, J. E., Segura-Cox, D., & Haugbølle, T. 2024, A&A, 690, A297

    2024

  42. [42]

    J., Bate, M

    Kurosawa, R., Harries, T. J., Bate, M. R., & Symington, N. H. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 1134

    2004

  43. [43]

    T., Pérez, L

    Kurtovic, N. T., Pérez, L. M., Benisty, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, L44

    2018

  44. [44]

    1997, A&A, 317, L75

    Laskar, J. 1997, A&A, 317, L75

    1997

  45. [45]

    & Adams, F

    Laughlin, G. & Adams, F. C. 1998, ApJ, 508, L171

    1998

  46. [46]

    Lin, J. W. & Chiang, E. 2019, ApJ, 883, 68 Löhne, T., Krivov, A. V ., & Rodmann, J. 2008, ApJ, 673, 1123

    2019

  47. [47]

    J., Kratter, K

    Longarini, C., Price, D. J., Kratter, K. M., Lodato, G., & Clarke, C. J. 2025, MNRAS, 541, 1145

    2025

  48. [48]

    B., Hales, A

    Lovell, J. B., Hales, A. S., Kennedy, G. M., et al. 2026, A&A, 705, A200

    2026

  49. [49]

    B., Lynch, E

    Lovell, J. B., Lynch, E. M., Chittidi, J., et al. 2025, ApJ, 990, 145

    2025

  50. [50]

    & Kuchner, M

    Lyra, W. & Kuchner, M. 2013, Nature, 499, 184

    2013

  51. [51]

    A., Hurt, S

    MacGregor, M. A., Hurt, S. A., Stark, C. C., et al. 2022, ApJ, 933, L1

    2022

  52. [52]

    A., Matrà, L., Kalas, P., et al

    MacGregor, M. A., Matrà, L., Kalas, P., et al. 2017, ApJ, 842, 8

    2017

  53. [53]

    B., & Heggie, D

    Malmberg, D., Davies, M. B., & Heggie, D. C. 2011, MNRAS, 411, 859

    2011

  54. [54]

    F., Tazzari, M., Long, F., et al

    Manara, C. F., Tazzari, M., Long, F., et al. 2019, A&A, 628, A95

    2019

  55. [55]

    J., Pinte, C., & Laibe, G

    Mentiplay, D., Price, D. J., Pinte, C., & Laibe, G. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 3806

    2020

  56. [56]

    Murray, C. D. & Dermott, S. F. 1999, Solar system dynamics

    1999

  57. [57]

    2014, ApJ, 797, 32

    Padoan, P., Haugbølle, T., & Nordlund, Å. 2014, ApJ, 797, 32

    2014

  58. [58]

    L., & Nordlund, Å

    Padoan, P., Kritsuk, A., Norman, M. L., & Nordlund, Å. 2005, ApJ, 622, L61

    2005

  59. [59]

    Padoan, P., Pan, L., Pelkonen, V .-M., Haugbølle, T., & Nordlund, â. «. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 862

    2025

  60. [60]

    Pearce, T. D. & Wyatt, M. C. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 2541

    2014

  61. [61]

    2025, A&A, 694, A327 Pérez, S., Casassus, S., Hales, A., et al

    Pelkonen, V .-M., Padoan, P., Juvela, M., Haugbølle, T., & Nordlund, Å. 2025, A&A, 694, A327 Pérez, S., Casassus, S., Hales, A., et al. 2020, ApJ, 889, L24

    2025

  62. [62]

    2013, A&A, 549, A82

    Pfalzner, S. 2013, A&A, 549, A82

    2013

  63. [63]

    2012, A&A, 545, A81

    Pinilla, P., Benisty, M., & Birnstiel, T. 2012, A&A, 545, A81

    2012

  64. [64]

    Price, D. J. 2007, PASA, 24, 159

    2007

  65. [65]

    Price, D. J. & Laibe, G. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 3929

    2020

  66. [66]

    J., Wurster, J., Tricco, T

    Price, D. J., Wurster, J., Tricco, T. S., et al. 2018, Publications of the Astronom- ical Society of Australia, 35, e031

    2018

  67. [67]

    Rafikov, R. R. 2002, ApJ, 569, 997

    2002

  68. [68]

    2018, MNRAS, 474, 4460

    Ragusa, E., Rosotti, G., Teyssandier, J., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 4460

    2018

  69. [69]

    K., Tobin, J

    Reynolds, N. K., Tobin, J. J., Sheehan, P. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 164

    2024

  70. [70]

    J., Stark, C

    Rodigas, T. J., Stark, C. C., Weinberger, A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 798, 96

    2015

  71. [71]

    2023, A&A, 669, A31

    Schib, O., Mordasini, C., & Helled, R. 2023, A&A, 669, A31

    2023

  72. [72]

    Shakura, N. I. & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337

    1973

  73. [73]

    & Ogilvie, G

    Teyssandier, J. & Ogilvie, G. I. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 3221

    2016

  74. [74]

    P., Stamatellos, D., & Whitworth, A

    Thies, I., Kroupa, P., Goodwin, S. P., Stamatellos, D., & Whitworth, A. P. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 1817

    2011

  75. [75]

    J., Vigan, A., Lacour, S., et al

    Wang, J. J., Vigan, A., Lacour, S., et al. 2021, AJ, 161, 148

    2021

  76. [76]

    Ward, W. R. 1986, Icarus, 67, 164

    1986

  77. [77]

    2023, MNRAS, 518, 5620

    Weber, P., Pérez, S., Guidi, G., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 5620

    2023

  78. [78]

    Wijnen, T. P. G., Pelupessy, F. I., Pols, O. R., & Portegies Zwart, S. 2017, A&A, 604, A88

    2017

  79. [79]

    Williams, J. P. & Cieza, L. A. 2011, ARA&A, 49, 67

    2011

  80. [80]

    Wyatt, M. C. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 339

    2008

Showing first 80 references.